Characterized - Judgment Search Results

Kanjibhai Babaldas Patel Vs. Election Officer of A.P.M.C., Visnagar

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2001)1GLR259

provision merely because a member was earlier removed could be characterised as a reason for disqualification it is not appropriate at

Biswanath Nayak and ors. Vs. Parbati Bewa and ors.

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 2000(II)OLR629

keeping in view the aforesaid principle of law has loosely characterised the a schedule properties which had admittedly fallen to the

Daewoo Motors India Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2000)(71)ECC279

which are only in the nature of accessories could be characterised as components or integral parts of a trailer similarly on

Kamat Hotels (i) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2001)78ITD241(Mum.)

linked to the sale proceeds and therefore they cannot be characterised as rent in the judgment cited the question was whether

Assistant Commissioner of Vs. A.S. Wardekar

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in: (2001)77ITD405(Kol.)

taxability of an amount would depend on the nature and character of the receipt surrender of tenancy right in favour of

Sita Steel Tubes (P.) Ltd. Vs. Assessing Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

fell under the specific head described in section 9 the character of that income was not altered because it was received

Subhangi Tukaram Sawant Vs. R.H. Mendonca and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2001ALLMR(Cri)1819; 2001BomCR(Cri)152; (2001)4BOMLR631; 2001CriLJ3745; 2001(3)MhLj580

or that such an order can for that reason be characterised as mala fide it might well be that a magistrate

Pennar Delta Auyacutdars Association and Others Vs. Government of Andh ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2000(3)ALD182; 2000(2)ALT634

levels involving more than one individual such decisions cannot be characterised as arbitrary and mala fide one 48 sri s ratnachandra

Medical Genetic Clinic and Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

carrying on of business a professional activity can also be characterised as an activity of carrying on business if it is

Delhi Administration Vs. Gurdip Singh Uban and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2000(9)SC245; (2001)1MLJ45(SC); 2000(5)SCALE651; (2000)7SCC296; [2000]Supp2SCR496; AIR2000SC3737

a mere erroneous decision and a decision which could be characterised as vitiated by 039 error apparent 039 and that a