Challenge - Year 2009 - Judgments

May 15 2009 (TRI)

Supreme Exports and Another Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Chennai

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Decided on: May-15-2009

claims for refund of export cess paid by the appellants herein have been rejected on the twin grounds of limitation...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 28 2009 (TRI)

M/S. Reliance Power Limited, Vs. Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory ...

Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on: Jan-28-2009

..... the appellant neither chose to file a separate writ petition challenging the government order before the high court nor to file any petition ..... party even then the appellant did not choose to challenge the said finding before any forum admittedly there is no explanation from ..... the appellant as to why that finding was not challenged 24 the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant would cite the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 18 2009 (FN)

Travelers Indemnity Co. Vs. Bailey

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-18-2009

..... injunction because the 1986 injunction has never meant what the court today assumes respondents challenge is not an impermissible collateral attack the court of appeals correctly concluded that the ..... both the 1986 and 2004 settlement negotiations iii the court s holding that respondents challenge is an impermissible collateral attack is predicated on its determination that the 1986 insurance .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 25 2009 (FN)

Office of Fair Trading (Oft) Vs. Abbey National Plc and ors

Court: UK Supreme Court

Decided on: Nov-25-2009

..... unauthorised overdrafts including unpaid item charges and other related charges as described below can be challenged by the respondent the office of fair trading the oelig oft as excessive in ..... such price or remuneration disproportionate overall then regulation 6 2 b excludes the challenge if there is no challenge to the overall proportionality of the overall price or remuneration of the package .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 10 2009 (FN)

Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) Vs. Af (Appell ...

Court: House of Lords

Decided on: Jun-10-2009

..... an alternative explanation for his presence there sufficient to permit the advocate effectively to challenge the allegation where however the open material consisted purely of general assertions and ..... applicants 8217 fundamental rights whilst however non derogating control orders such as those under challenge here by definition involve no deprivation of liberty they involve the severest possible .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 18 2009 (FN)

Rb (Algeria) (Fc) and Another (Appellants) Vs. Secretary of State for ...

Court: House of Lords

Decided on: Feb-18-2009

..... for these reasons i do not consider that your lordships ought to entertain this challenge 76 the challenge to the use of closed material that has properly been developed before your lordships ..... court of participation in terrorist conspiracies to cause explosions in that country the grounds of challenge 158 all three aliens claim that deportation to their respective countries of nationality would .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 16 2009 (TRI)

Gail Gas Ltd. Vs. Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board

Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on: Jul-16-2009

..... was extended by one month under the garb of an appeal challenging the letter dated 24 3 09 issued by the respondent petroleum board rejecting ..... issued on 24 3 09 the appellant has not chosen to challenge the said letter immediately nor made any representation on this letter and only ..... that the ground urged by the counsel for the appellant challenging the letter issued by the board dated 24 3 09 are not valid .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 09 2009 (FN)

R Vs. Horncastle and Others (Appellants) (on Appeal from the Court of ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-09-2009

..... not constitute a sufficient basis for allowing hearsay evidence and disabling the defendant from challenging the evidence in these cases witnesses are expected to give evidence witness reluctance does ..... although anonymous testimony was received by an investigatory judge it had been possible to challenge that evidence para 82 the commission concluded that the applicants convictions did not solely .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 22 2009 (TRI)

Jatinder Kumar and Another Vs. Union of India, Through the Secretary, ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on: Sep-22-2009

..... the decision adversely affecting them consequently the appellants application was rejected summarily the appellants challenged the aforesaid order before the apex court the apex court has held as under ..... in those applications the promoted stenographers the administrative tribunal dismissed the applications it was challenged by the assistants before the high court in the writ petitions and the high .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 01 2009 (HC)

Hindusthan National Glass and Industries Limited and anr. Vs. Reserve ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Sep-01-2009

..... a legal proposition that a subsequent writ petition against a final order cannot incorporate a challenge to the legality of the statute or notification under which the impugned proceedings were ..... economic matters it contends that courts in india are now loath to entertain a generic challenge founded on likelihood of institutional bias though individual personal bias still remains a germane .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Challenge - Judgment Search Results