Challenge - Judgment Search Results

Georgia Vs. Mccollum

Court: US Supreme Court

..... trial judge denied the prosecution s motion to prohibit respondents from exercising peremptory challenges in a racially discriminatory manner the georgia supreme court affirmed distinguishing edmonson ..... constitutes state action third whether prosecutors have standing to raise this constitutional challenge and fourth whether the constitutional rights of a criminal defendant nonetheless preclude .....

Morgan Vs. Illinois

Court: US Supreme Court

..... an adequate voir dire to identify unqualified jurors morgan could not exercise intelligently his challenge for cause against prospective jurors who would unwaveringly impose death after a finding of ..... emphasis added we deal here with petitioner s ability to exercise intelligently his complementary challenge for cause against those biased persons on the venire who as jurors would unwaveringly .....

Lucas Vs. South Carolina Coastal Council

Court: US Supreme Court

..... lucas from applying for a permit under the 1990 amendment for future construction and challenging on takings grounds any denial but it does preclude both practically and legally any ..... legislative judgment must be allowed to control accordingly this court always has required plaintiffs challenging the constitutionality of an ordinance to provide some factual foundation of record that contravenes .....

Lujan Vs. Defenders of Wildlife

Court: US Supreme Court

..... separate decisions to fund particular projects allegedly causing them harm respondents chose to challenge a more generalized level of government action rules regarding consultation the invalidation of ..... causation or redressability is concerned as we have said in another context suits challenging not specifically identifiable government violations of law but the particular programs agencies establish .....

indra Sawhney Etc. Etc Vs. Union of India and Others, Etc. Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1993SC477; [1992]Supp2SCR454; 1992DGLS(soft)768:1992Supp(3)SCC217

..... them that was the command of the fourteenth amendment not unnaturally these measures were challenged in courts with varying results the four decisions examined hereinafter rendered during the ..... extent of backwardness all such programmes must stand the test of judicial review whenever challenged reservation being exclusionary in character must necessarily stand the test of heightened administrative .....

Parke Vs. Raley

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of our history it appears that state courts altogether prohibited defendants in recidivism proceedings from challenging prior convictions as erroneous as opposed to void for lack of jurisdiction see e g ..... 243 162 n w 358 361 1917 in recent years state courts have permitted various challenges to prior convictions and have allocated proof burdens differently some like the sixth circuit evidently .....

Subhash Chandra Vs. District Cane Officer and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1993)ILLJ255All

..... union limited najibabad this order is the subject matter of challenge in this petition e sri brijendra singh petitioner in writ ..... development union limited najibabad which is the subject matter of challenge in this petition g sri manvendra pal singh and chandra ..... cane development union limited bijnor which is the subject matter of challenge in this petition j sri yashwant singh petitioner in writ .....

Sant Ram and anr. Vs. Mohinder Singh and ors.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

..... neither in the grounds of appeal nor at the time of arguments these findings were challenged therefore the contention of sh kashmiri lal appearing vice learned counsel for the respondent plaintiff ..... period of limitation available to the coparcener through whom he has acquired the right to challenge the alienation an after born coparcener suffers under the same disabilities as those under which .....

Hari Krishna Kanoi and anr. Vs. Appropriate Authority and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1994]207ITR743(Cal)

..... was received by the transferee without demur 39 the transferee then filed a writ application challenging the order of the appropriate authority the court held that the transferee had no locus standi ..... authority could not question the apparent consideration as set out in the agreement is a challenge to the decision making process and only consequentially to the decision itself 64 the petitioners .....

Shri Kihota Hollohon Vs. Mr. Zachilhu and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1993SC412,JT1992(1)SC600,1992(1)SCALE338,1992Supp(2)SCC651,[1992]1SCR686

..... of a member of a house under this schedule 7 the challenge to the constitutional validity of the amendment which introduces the ..... outside the jurisdiction of the authority taking such action but precludes challenge to such action on the ground of an error committed in ..... any ground but this immunity from attack cannot apply where the challenge is not that the satisfaction is improper or unjustified but .....