Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: central laws extension to jammu and kashmir act 1968 Page 6 of about 464 results (0.090 seconds)

Jun 09 2006 (HC)

State of J. and K. and ors. Vs. Mst. Khazri and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR2007J& K23

..... 2 and 6 thereof, they would still be available to the residents of the state of jammu and kashmir because 44th amendment act, 1978, does not have its extension to the state of j.& k.article 19 of the constitution of india assumes the existence of a free citizen, which right can no longer be enjoyed if a ..... in holding that the premises had been forcibly occupied by the state police forces.14. we are conscious of the fact that security force authorities of the state and central government, have been facing difficulty in tackling militancy all over the state particularly in kashmir valley. during the course of security force operation, one cannot rule out bona ..... property was needed for public purpose or use by the functionaries of the state or union.17. the state has been provided the mode and procedure prescribed by the laws in force in the state for continuing their occupation in any premises which may be required by it for public purpose. their action of perpetuating their unauthorised and .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 08 1964 (SC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi and Rajasthan Vs. Anant Rao B. Kamat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1966SC279

..... any hardship or anomaly, or removing any difficulty that may arise as a result of the extension of this act to the merged territories or to the territories which immediately before the 1st november, 1956, were comprised in any part b state, the central government may, by general or special order, make an exemption, reduction in rate or order ..... state immediately before the appointed day, or for the year in question, as the case may be by the amount of such total income and where under any state law, the rates of tax in force in the state are prescribed with reference to the total income including agricultural income, the state rate of tax shall be the rate ..... total income including the agricultural income without taking into account any reduction of tax allowed on the agricultural income by the state law by the amount of such total income. explanation. - where there was no state law relating to charge of income-tax and super-tax, the rates of income-tax and super-tax in force in that state .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 1989 (HC)

Guest Keen Williams Ltd. Vs. Guest Keen Williams Junior Management Sta ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1989)1CALLT214(HC),1989(1)CHN185,93CWN462,[1990(60)FLR458],(1990)IILLJ522Cal

..... policy decision of the government to ultimately operate this industry exclusively and invited functional control. the court next took note of the fact that, along with the extensive functional control, shriram received sizeable assistance in the shape of loans and overdrafts running into several crores of rupees through various agencies. it was men said ..... , came within the ambit of article 12 so as to be amenable to the discipline of article 21. for that purpose, the court first examined the central government's industrial policy resolutions of 1948 and 1956 and then the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951 enacted to carry out the objectives of the ..... controverting the above contentions, it was submitted on behalf of shriram that control or regulation of a private corporation's functions by the state under general statutory law, such as the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951 was only in exercise of police power of regulation by the state and such regulation did .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 13 2002 (HC)

Md. Monisur Islam Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... deputy secretary, govt. of assam, political (a) department. his further grievance is that the central government has also failed to discharge its statutory obligation to consider and dispose of his representation expeditiously as required under the law. the central government disposed of his representation dated 29.1.2002 only on 18.2.2002 and there ..... authorities that the rule requiring expeditious consideration of a detenu's representation is a judge-made rule based on the provisions of cofeposa and that the extension of the application of the rule to cases of detention under the act was unwarranted. it was further contended that in the cases of detention under ..... the representation of the detenu under section 11 of the cofeposa act and secondly, whether the power of revocation of an order of detention by the central government under section 11 thereof is exercisable only after the representation had been rejected by the state government and the advisory board. the apex court while .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 02 1994 (HC)

Varshney General Sales and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [2003]130STC202(All)

..... to such restrictions and conditions in regard to the system of levy, rates and other incidents of the tax as parliament may by law specify.' 14. parliament enacted the central sales tax act, 1956 and section 3 thereof formulates principles for determining when a sale or purchase of goods takes place in the course ..... commission appointed by the ministry of finance, government of india, in april, 1953, under the chairmanship of dr. john mathai. in the course of its extensive analysis of the various systems of state and local taxes prevalent in the country, the commission dwelt at some length on the various state level taxes and ..... further, in the same entry 'including taxes on entertainment, amusement, betting and gambling 'also corelates with the entertainment, amusements or enjoyment. reliance was placed in re : central provinces and berar sales of motor spirit and lubricants taxation ac , on the following observations : 'similarly, item 50 (list ii) relates to taxes on luxuries. 'these .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 1961 (SC)

Kanshi Ram Jagan Nath and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1966SC805; 1978(2)ELT408(SC); [1962]2SCR942

..... law imposing excise duty on the manufacture of any class of goods. attention is, therefore, drawn ..... included or even contemplated in the act. the result, therefore, is quite clear that the robkar, under which the royalty was imposed, cannot be said to be a law corresponding to the central excises and salt act, 1944, and is, therefore, not within the repeal created by s. 13(2) of the finance act, 1950. 11. in our judgment, ..... in force in any state other than jammu and kashmir a law corresponding to, but other than an act referred to in sub-section (1) or (2) of section 11, such law is hereby repealed with effect from the said date..........'. 6. it if contended that by the extension of the central excises and salt act, 1944, there was repeal of any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 09 1997 (HC)

Vijayakumar Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1999(4)KarLJ128

..... sub-section (1) of section 2, the act was extended to the whole of india except the state of jammu and kashmir, as noted earlier. the extension of the act including to the state of karnataka impliedly repealed the state act dealing with the land acquisition. assuming for the sake of argument that the state act ..... supreme court in kanthimathy plantation private limited v state of kerala and others, dealt with such a situation in relation to the law of acquisition in the state of kerala before the amendment of the central act vide act no. 68 of 1984. the apex court held:--'the legislative entry for acquisition and requisitioning of property is 42 ..... issue the notification under section 4 of the land acquisition act as he could not be held to be either collector or appropriate government within the meaning ofthe central act. in support of his contention the learned counsel has relied upon the division bench judgment of this court in kanaka gruha nirmana sahakara sangha, avalahalli, bangalore .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 08 1964 (SC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, New Delhi Vs. Anant Rao B. Kamat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [1964]53ITR307(SC); [1964]8SCR263

..... any hardship or anomaly, or removing any difficulty, that mayarise as a result of the extension of this act to the merged territories or tothe territories which immediately before the 1st november, 1956, were comprisedin any part b state, the central government may, by general or special order,make an exemption, reduction in rate or other ..... immediately before the appointed day, or for the year in question, as thecase may be, by the amount of such total income and where under any state law,the rates of tax in force in the state are prescribed with reference to thetotal income including agricultural income, the state rate of tax shall be therate ..... the totalincome including the agricultural income without taking into account anyreduction of tax allowed on the agricultural income by the state law by theamount of such total income; 11. explanation. - where there was no state law relating to charge ofincome-tax and super-tax, the rates of income-tax and super-tax in force inthat state .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 05 1983 (HC)

R.B. Jodhamal Bishen Lal and ors. Vs. the State of Jammu and Kashmir a ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR1984J& K10

..... no. fst/66/65 of 1965 dated 18-6-1965 be modified to the extent indicated below in respect of levy of surcharge of grant of extensions :-- 1. 1st extension ... 2%2. 2nd extension ... 3%3. 3rd extension ... 5%by order of the govt. of jammu and kashmir.' 7. in december 1968, the system of inviting sealed tenders was replaced by the ..... , so thatthe court could be in a position to judge foritself which way the public interest lay andwhat the equity of the case demanded. insaying so, i am following the law laid downby their lordships in m, p. sugar mill'scase (air 1979 sc 621) (supra), where itwas held (at p. 644): . . '....... if the government wants to resist the ..... doctrine of promissory estoppel has also been applied against the government and the defence based on executive necessity has been categorically negatived. x x x x x x x....... the law may, therefore, now be taken to be settled as a result of this decision, that where the govt. makes a promise knowing or intending that it would be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 1964 (SC)

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Gwalior Rayon Silk Manufacturing (We ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1964SC1903; [1964(9)FLR124]; [1964]53ITR466(SC); [1964]7SCR892

..... 22, 1949 though it was brought into the agreement on february 25, 1950. section 60-a was introduced in the income-tax act by s. 19 of the taxation laws (extension to merged states and amendment) act, (no. lxvii of 1949). originally it only applied to merged territories, but when the income-tax act was extended to part ..... necessary or expedient so to do for avoiding any hardship or anomaly or removing any difficulty that may arise as a result of the extension of the income-tax act to part b states, the central government may, by general or special order, make as exemption, reduction in rate or other modification in respect of income-tax in ..... which we have already referred above. this was followed by the concessions order, clause 16 of which specifically referred to concessions to industrial undertakings and provided that the central government having regard to all the circumstances of the case might grant such relief if any as it thought appropriate. it may be mentioned further that the same .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //