Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: cattle trespass act 1966 chapter i preliminary Sorted by: recent Page 40 of about 499 results (0.111 seconds)

K. Kapen Chako Vs. the Provident Investment Company (P) Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (1977)1SCC593; [1977]1SCR1026

..... committed default in the payment of stipulated rent for more than 3 months after its due date, or allowed strangers to trespass upon the holding. in the present case, the appellant has been found to be a habitual defaulter since 1952 in the ..... that the damages awarded against the appellant cannot be sustained by the provisions of the 1964 act as amended by act 35 of 1969, act 25 of 1971 and act 17 of 1972.23. the appellant filed an application praying for reopening the decree passed by ..... appeal remanded the case to the subordinate judge for fresh trial. the trial court on remand decreed the suit on 25 october, 1966. the respondent obtained a decree for eviction with arrears of rent and damages amounting to rs. 1,00,000/- for certain ..... was right on the above conclusion, the provisions contained in section 108 sub-sections (2) and (3) of the 1964 act as amended in 1969 require the court to apply the law retrospectively in respect of pending suits, appeals, applications, decree where dispossession .....

Rajasthan Udyog Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1978Raj31; 1976(9)WLN835

..... of any standing crop, fence or jungle;' section 4, as it stood on the date of the issuance of the impugned notification viz, after the coming into force of act no. xxii of 1966, reads as under,-- '4. preliminary proceedings preceding intended acquisition.-- (1) whenever the state government considers it necessary or expedient to acquire land in any locality, needed ..... a careful consideration to the rival contentions of the parties. now we will read section 4 as it stood prior to the coming into force of the amending act no. xxii of 1966 as well as the amended section 4, as it was in force when the impugned order dated march 13. 1973 was passed. 13. section 4 as it ..... a number of grounds, which will be dealt with at seriatim. 6. the first contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that act no. xxiv of 1953 was amended by act no. xxii of 1966 whereby the present section 4 was substituted. the effect of the amendment was that before issuing the order dated march 13, 1973, it became .....

Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practi ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1979]49CompCas686(Bom)

..... vagueness as urged on behalf of the petitioner. 51. reliance was placed on headnote (b) in rampiyari khemka v. cit, : [1966]61itr600(cal) . in that case, a notice under s. 33b of the indian i.t. act, 1922, to revise the assessment was served on the assessee. in that notice, the reasons given for revision of assessment were that on ..... contents of the complaint were explained, without disclosing the names of the girls who made the complaint, and a charge was given to them on the lines that they trespassed into the girls' hostel, made unauthorised entry into the girls' hostel and they were thus accused of gross misconduct. they were asked to show cause and were directed ..... to ex parte decision. each one of the students was given paper and pen and asked to write down whatever he had to say. the students uniformly denied having trespassed into the girls' hostel or having misbehaved with them as alleged. they added that they were in their own hostel at the material time. before the appellants and .....

Kleppe Vs. New Mexico

Court : US Supreme Court

..... u. s. 525 . we have noted, for example, that the property clause gives congress the power over the public lands "to control their occupancy and use, to protect them from trespass and injury and to prescribe the conditions upon which others may obtain rights in them. . . ." utah power & light co. v. united states, 243 u. s. 389 , ..... burros, and after he personally inspected the taylor well area, stephenson complained to the livestock board that the burros were interfering with his livestock operation by molesting his cattle and eating their feed. thereupon the board rounded up and removed 19 unbranded and unclaimed burros pursuant to the new mexico estray law. each burro was seized on ..... is branded with a brand which is not on record in the office of the cattle sanitary board of new mexico. . . ." n.m.stat.ann. 47-14-1 (1966). it is not disputed that the animals regulated by the wild free-roaming horses and burros act are estrays within the meaning of this law. [ footnote 3 ] the record is .....

Buckley Vs. Valeo

Court : US Supreme Court

..... first and fourteenth amendments on governmental action may vary in their stringency depending on the capacity in which the government is acting. the government as proprietor, adderley v. florida, 385 u. s. 39 (1966), is, i believe, page 424 u. s. 291 permitted to affect putatively protected interests in a manner in ..... warrant for assuming that public disclosure of contributions between $10 and $100 is authorized by the act. accordingly, we do not reach the question whether information concerning gifts of this size can be made available to the public without trespassing impermissibly on first amendment rights. cf. california bankers assn. v. shultz, 416 u.s ..... . at 416 u. s. 56 -57. [ footnote 112 ] in summary, we find no constitutional infirmities in the recordkeeping, reporting, and disclosure provisions of the act. [ footnote 113 ] page 424 u. .....

Smt. Indira Nehru Gandhi Vs. Shri Raj NaraIn and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1975SC2299; 1975(Supp)SCC1; [1976]2SCR347

..... election disputes to authorities other than those in the hierarchy of our judicial system. in fact, until the passing of the representation of the people (amendment) act, 47 of 1966, by which high courts were given jurisdiction to try election petitions, that jurisdiction was vested first in a tribunal consisting of three members and later in ..... a problem must not be so wide as to rob our method of construction itself of legal propriety or give rise to the suspicion that we have ourselves clearly trespassed into the territory of law making. the lines of demarcation, though difficult to draw sometimes, are, nevertheless, there.581. i do not think that it ..... the state of public affairs, at a time when no parliament existed. for this imprisonment an action was brought. the declaration complained, not only of the personal trespass, but also of extortion of the plaintiffs money practised by defendant under colour of the speaker's warrant. the pica of justification under that warrant, which could .....

K.K. Birla Vs. the Press Council of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1976Delhi753

..... can file a writ petition even though he has no proprietory or even fiduciary interest in the subject matter (see venkateswara rao v. govt. of andhra pradesh) : [1966]2scr172 . the petitioner is not a mere busy body who wants to interfere in things which do not concern him, but he is a, person who has a genuine ..... of certiorari or prohibition can be issued whenever any body or persons having legal authority to determine questions affecting the rights of the subjects, and having the duty to act judicially, acts in excess of its or their legal authority ii. mr. anthony relied upon n. v. suba rao v. state, a.i.r. 1968 a.p. ..... has to be ascertained whether the legislature has expressly ordained so. in this connection, the statement of objects and reasotis might be admissible, not for construing the act, but for ascertaining the conditions that prevailed when the legislation was enacted. it also furnishes valuable historic material in ascertaining the reasons which induced the legislature to enact .....

Mammunhi Beary Vs. Neelamma and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1976Kant21; 1975(2)KarLJ300

..... the government would obviously be that the occupation though unauthorised, has resulted in benefit to the public by the occupant or trespasser growing food crops.' it was also noticed that when waste land is granted, the government generally charges what is called seignioragae ..... mulgenidar of the land to which the kumaki privilege is attached. a kumakidar's privileges in the land are grazing his cattle, cutting and collecting leaves, timber and other forest produce for his agricultural and domestic purposes.any registered holder or walawargdar or ..... lands were therefore held to be not an accession to the mortgaged property.8. in rama handa v. shankar narayana rao, ((1966) 2 mys lj 38). the scope of paragraph 40 of the board's standing order no. 15 was considered. it was ..... upon the occupant the right of an owner. the legal position is stated in section 3 of the madras land encroachment act (iii of 1905). in such a case, it will be noticed, the position is not different from an actual grant .....

State of U.P. Vs. Smt. Ram Sri and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1976All121

..... the same has been so found by the supreme court in the state of bombay v. venkat rao krishna rao gujar (air 1966 sc 991). the supreme court was dealing with regard to the interpretation of section 5 (a) of the madhya pradesh abolition of proprietary rights ..... by the trial court on the findings that the land in suit was the cattle market site of the defendant and should be deemed to have been settled with her under section 9 of the act as buildings and land appurtenant thereto. the trial court held that there were ..... it. as a result of the aforesaid notification, with effect from 15-7-1966, the aforesaid plot no. 861 of village bisauli got included in the territorial limits of the town area, acchalda. thereafter, ..... issued a notification under section 3 (1) of the 0. p. town areas act, 1914, on 13-7-1966 and declared bisauli to be included in the town area of achhalda with effect from 15-7-1966. plot no. 861 was also one of the plots which were included in .....

Sadhu Singh and ors. Vs. Pritam Singh S/O NaraIn Singh and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1976P& H38

..... us to give rise to two distinct causes of action, the first arising when the act of trespass is committed; the second when the. mesne profits should have been receivable bv the plaintiff, but for the defendant's wrongful act'the above observations were made in a case where it was not canvassed that the causes ..... and followed the same.26. in the andhra pradesh high court a relatively recent division bench judgment reported as abburi rangamma v. chittrapu venupurnachandra rao. air 1966 andh pra 325 has exhaustively considered the matter both on principle and authority and then held that the cause of action for recovery of immovable property is ..... suffices to advert to the relevant facts briefly. the subject-matter of the dispute is the urban property situated at circular road. ambala city. in january, 1966. pritam singh respondent alone brought a suit for possession of the above-said property alleging inter alia that the defendants were in wrongful and unauthorised occupation thereof from .....