Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: cattle trespass act 1966 chapter i preliminary Sorted by: recent Page 41 of about 499 results (0.526 seconds)

Magulu Jal and ors. Vs. Bhagaban Rai and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1975Ori219

..... to his share. the suit was filed on 29-10-1965. the case arises out of an area in the ex-gangpur state wherein the act was brought into force on 1-4-1966. mohanti, j. held that as the bhogra lands vested in the state no further action in civil court was maintainable and the jurisdiction of the ..... aside.(ii) by the settlement plaintiffs have acquired title to the b schedule lands and are entitled to declaration of title and recovery of possession from the defendants who trespassed thereon.(iii) defendants acquired title to the a schedule lands by the settlement and plaintiffs cannot evict them.(iv) c schedule lands are the raiyati lands of the ..... plaintiffs. they were in their possession. defendants are trespassers and are liable to be evicted therefrom.45. in the result, the judgments of the courts below are set aside regarding a schedule lands and confirmed in respect of .....

Schlesinger Vs. Councilman

Court : US Supreme Court

..... historically they have not been the exclusive means of collateral attack. nor were they the earliest. in wise v. withers, 3 cranch 331 (1806), an action for trespass against a collector of court-martial fines, the court held that the plaintiff, a federal official, was exempt from military duty, and that the court-martial lacked ..... 396 u.s. 1013 (1970). [ footnote 26 ] in united states v. frischholz, 16 u.s.c.m.a. 150, 151, 36 c.m.r. 306, 307 (1966), the court of military appeals stated: "[article 76] does not insulate a conviction from subsequent attack in an appropriate forum. at best, it provides finality only as to interpretations of ..... petitioners argued that, because councilman had not filed a complaint to institute the action as required by fed.rule civ.proc. 3, the court lacked jurisdiction to act. the district court concluded that the papers filed by councilman -- motions for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction, and supporting affidavit and briefs -- although .....

Totaram Maharu Vs. Ramabai and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1976Bom315; (1977)79BOMLR87; 1977MhLJ97

..... the preliminary decree should be amended accordingly. the trail court granted that application, but from that order rag preferred an appeal to the high court, and in his judgment bachelor, acting c. j., stated (at p. 545) (of ilr bom) = ( at p. 177 of air) that the share which yeshodabai would have taken, if an actual partition ..... judgment interprets. no such question can arise n the present case because, in view of the provisions of section 213 read with section 57 of the indian succession act, probate is not required in respect of the will in the present case, and the question had arisen n an ordinary suit filed for an appropriate declaration, as ..... influence from a particular type of relationship, and that the only kinds of relationship giving rise to such presumptions are those contemplated in section 111 of the evidence act. the supreme court has further observed that any other presumption from a relationship must, to be acceptable, be capable of being raised only under section 114 of .....

Chander Bhan Vs. Devi Dass and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1975CriLJ1003

..... his application for additional evidence. in this connection, reference may be made to ammed haji v. kunhambu, ilr (1959) ker 620:-in this appeal against acquittal on a charge of trespass it was contended for the appellant that due weight was not given to the delivery records produced by the prosecution.held: though delivery records are not conclusive in themselves, it .....

Govardhanbhai Somabhai Patel Vs. Parshottam Urnedbhai and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1976Guj98

..... of the suit filed by the plaintiff, the aforesaid suit was withdrawn. in the suit which has given rise to this appeal, a preliminary decree was passed on 4-3-1966 with the consent of the parties. according to the consent terms the affairs of the firm were managed by the plaintiff up to 7-7-1960 whereas, the defendants were ..... mistake or an error apparent on the face of the record, there is nothing in rule 342 which compels the court to ignore that mistake and do the more mechanical act of passing a final decree in terms of the report'.9.. it is, however, argued by the learned advocate for the appellant that, in view of the provisions of rules .....

Shri Kishan Vs. Mahabir Singh and Two ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1975Delhi575

..... including, inter alia, garden, grounds and out-houses appertaining to such building. further, as observed by sarkar j, in lakhmi chand v. kauran devi, : [1966]2scr544 , the slum areas act is not concerned with the relations between landlords and tenants as such, and it does not purport to interfere directly with the ordinary contractual right of landlords and ..... judgment, the landlord preferred a second appeal, s.a.o. no. 216-d of 1962, to the high court. the said second appeal was dismissed on october 25, 1966, by r. s. narula j. (as the learned judge then was). in the second appeal also, the finding concerning subletting was not questioned, and only the finding of ..... other words, the person in occupation of the premises in question may be either a lawful tenant or an unlawful trespasser. thus, the definition of 'occupier' in the act appears to include a lawful or unlawful sub-tenant. yet, even this extended or wide definition of the expression 'occupier' has been utilised only in the .....

Chhaganlal Mansukhlal and anr. Vs. the Agricultural Produce Market Com ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1975)16GLR916

..... of place.28. coming to mysore decision, the point which the learned judges considered in that case was whether section 65 of the mysore agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act (27 of 1966), contemplated a levy of market fee on plurality of transactions or not. this paint arose because the learned advocate general, who appeared for the state in that case, ..... responsible to pay the market fees to the committee. bye-law no. 52 provides for the working hours of the market yard with reference to the agricultural produce and cattle. so far as the agricultural produce which is dealt with by the petitioners is concerned, it provides that the working hours would be from 8. 30 to 12. ..... sale of agricultural produce shall be deemed to have taken place in a market area if it has been weighed or measured os surveyed or delivered in case of cattle in the market area for the purpose of sale, notwithstanding the fact that the property in the agricultural produce has by reason of such sale passed to a .....

V.K. Rao Vs. Chandappa Appa Devadiga

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1977)79BOMLR16

..... must be set aside, by the high court?7. whether under section 145(4) 2nd proviso the dispossession must be complete ouster or even partial dispossession by trespass and occupation of the part jointly with the complainant can also be considered and final order under section 145(6) declaring who is entitled to possession can be ..... his satisfaction. but apart from the allegations in the application as to his forcible and wrongful dispossession and assault, there was the fact that on june 11, 1966 the appellant had gone twice to the police station, requested the police to take action and had lodged two n.c, complaints. this material being before the magistrate ..... the endorsement discloses. mr. dikshit submitted that if it were examination, there should have been the examination-in-chief as required under the provisions of the evidence act. he submitted that there should have been on the record, what he stated on oath. if the applicant in ex parte application were to merely repeat what he .....

Samsher Singh Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1974SC2192; (1974)IILLJ465SC; (1974)2SCC831; [1975]1SCR814; 1975(1)SLJ1(SC)

..... cases. in some cases the rule of guidance has been stated to be 'the substances of the matter' and the 'foundation' of the order. when does 'motive' trespass into 'foundation'? when do we lift the voil of form to touch the 'substance'? when the court says so. these 'freudian' frontiers obviously fail in the work- ..... on 22 march, 1967 the chief secretary issued a notice to him substantially repeating the same charges which had been communicated by the registrar on 15 december, 1966 and asked the appellant to show cause as to why his services should not be terminated as he was found unsuitable for the job. the appellant gave an ..... a vast array of other powers exercisable by the president--to mention only a few appointment of judges; article 124 & 217, appointment of committees of official languages act, article 344, appointment of commissions to investigate conditions of backward classes; article 340, appointment of special officer for scheduled castes and tribes; article 338, exercise of his .....

Sheila Devi and ors. Vs. Kishan Lal Kalra and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1974Delhi491

..... to pursue that matter at that stage because the said rules, though prima facie applicable to delhi by virtue of the provisions in section 7 of the delhi high court act, 1966, were not determinative of the questions that have arisen, because the said rules did not lay down the manner of determination or the criterion in respect of all types of ..... the high court of judicature at lahore which are still applicable to the union territory of delhi by virtue of the provisions in section. 7 of the delhi high court act, 1966.(8) it was stated in the order of reference that there was some controversy before the learned judge on the question as to the applicability to the union territory of ..... partnership deed, dated 19.4.1967. (4)that the defendants be directed to render true and full accounts of m/s kishan lal & company for the period since 1.7.1966. kishan lal wine merchant since 9.10.1969 and kishan lal wine merchants (p) ltd. from 16.5.1971 onwards till date, and the said defendants be fixed with .....