Skip to content


Candidate - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: candidate Year: 2011 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.12 seconds)
Jun 23 2011 (FN)

Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club Pac Vs. Bennett

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-23-2011

..... penalty in davis consisted of raising the contribution limits for one of the candidates the candidate who benefited from the increased limits still had to go out and raise ..... burdening constitutionally protected speech might indirectly serve the state s anticorruption interest by encouraging candidates to take public financing does not establish the constitutionality of the matching funds provision .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 31 2011 (HC)

Tikam Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Mar-31-2011

..... decide when the votes were equally divided between the candidates the successful candidate it was held that the method of deciding by ..... in parcels according to the first preference recorded for each candidate the returning officer shall proceed to determine the result of ..... election where there is equality of votes between the rival candidates jagadisan j has explained the background of the procedure .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 12 2011 (HC)

Manabendra Nath Ghosh and Ors Vs. the Hon'Ble High Court At Calcutta

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Sep-12-2011

..... committee of the high court passed a resolution for giving posting to the 51 candidates who were selected out of the 2008 judicial service examination learned advocate general ..... specifically submitted that the aforesaid resolution of the administrative committee for absorbing 51 candidates selected out of the judicial service examination held on 2008 against the vacancies available .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 15 2011 (HC)

Mohan Krishna Shetty, Uttara Kannada District and Another Vs. Dinakar ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Apr-15-2011

..... other respondents represented the various parties and respondents 7 and 8 contested as independent candidates respondent no 8 was the returning officer entrusted with the duties and responsibilities of ..... prepared on the basis of three categories the first category is in respect of candidates contesting from registered recognized national political parties and state political parties in the state .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 01 2011 (TRI)

Kuldeep Arya Vs. Union of India Through Secretary to Government, New D ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-01-2011

..... 2008 threw up few problems the respondents observed that some of the reserved category candidates qualified on general standards without availing any relaxation meant for their respective reserved ..... paragraph 9 of the cadre allocation policy is reproduced below 8220 a reserved category candidate selected on general standards shall be eligible for allocation against the available insider unreserved .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 21 2011 (HC)

Sharad Tripathi Vs. Bhishm Shanker Alias Kushal Tiwari and Others

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Sep-21-2011

..... interest requires that sword of damocles should not remain hanging over the head of returned candidate for indefinite period he should be free to discharge his public duties and functions relating ..... to be published in the official gazette the declarations containing the names of the elected candidates 74 the rules have also been framed namely conduct of elections rules 1961 hereinafter referred .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 18 2011 (HC)

Sh. Satish Kumar Vs. Shri Vikas and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-18-2011

..... name of of who will step in the name of of candidate approved approved approved substitute substitute candidate candidate candidates candidate candidate nomination beingrejected on scrutinyor his withdrawingfrom the contest1 2 3 ..... to the instant case because here after the exclusion of the disqualified candidate two continuing candidates were left in the field emphasis added 42 in prakash khandre v .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 30 2011 (TRI)

E.M. Antony and Others Vs. V.N. Mathur and Others

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on: Sep-30-2011

..... to compare their position vis a vis other juniors be it general candidates or reserved candidates and establish that they too should have been considered for promotion to ..... rules this had certainly brought certain general candidates above certain reserved candidates though the reserved candidates were promoted earlier than the general candidates telescopically this change in the seniority affected .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 13 2011 (HC)

Namrata Hallur, Bagalkot and Others Vs. the State of Karnataka, Rep. b ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-13-2011

..... singh 8217 s case when higher qualification is possessed by a candidate such candidate shall be preferred than the candidates who are not having an higher qualification 13 per contra mr ..... or post prescribe any preferential or desirable qualification whether academic or otherwise then all candidates possessing such qualifications shall be eligible for interview irrespective of the marks obtained in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 2011 (HC)

Prem Kumar Singh and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jan-04-2011

..... accelerated seniority will undoubtedly prejudice the accrued right of seniority of general category candidates for consideration of their promotion and would also affect efficiency in administration of ..... and gives undue advantage of accelerated seniority to scheduled castes and scheduled tribe candidates for being considered on the promotional posts alongwith general category persons against an .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //