Calling - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: calling Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.101 seconds)Xs Financial Services Ltd. and Megapro Investments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. N. De ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-31-2003
Reported in: AIR2003Mad369; (2003)1MLJ613
d murugesan j 1 this original side appeal is directed against the order of the learned single judge dated 03...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMcConnell Vs. Federal Election Comm'n
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-10-2003
..... court in automobile workers the first such enactment responded to president theodore roosevelt s call for legislation forbidding all contributions by corporations to any political committee or for any ..... communication is that buckley drew a constitutionally mandated line between express advocacy and so called issue advocacy and that speakers possess an inviolable first amendment right to engage in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSstate Vs. Mohd. Afzal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2003
Reported in: 2003VIIAD(Delhi)1; 107(2003)DLT385; 2003(71)DRJ178; 2003(3)JCC1669
..... ex pw 36 3 at point x y the call number and calling number are the same but i d and imei ..... the receipt of the computer print outs of the telephone calls pertaining to telephone numbers 9811489429 9811489429 9811573506 9811573506 9810081228 9810081228 ..... shaukat one handsetwithout sim cardex pw61 4350102209452432 297 from the call details of the various telephone numbers the following position emerges .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState. Vs. Mohd. Afzal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2003
..... y in ex pw 36 3 at point x y the call number and calling number are the same but i d and imei number ..... sharma deposed that on 14 12 2001 two cassettes pertaining to calls received on phone no 9810081228 and 9811573506 along with transcription and ..... 69th amendment act 1991 the union territory of delhi shall be called the national capital territory of delhi and the administrator thereof appointed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAsha Sharma and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Chandigarh
Decided on: Feb-17-2003
Reported in: (2003)(3)SLJ345CAT
..... a special messenger or delivered by courier service which would have ensured the delivery of call letters inspite of the decision aforesaid it is pity that the chandigarh administration did not ..... the respondent department was that it besides issuing a public notice should have sent the call letters through registered post or through messenger or through courier service as substantial number of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA.R. Chowdhary and ors. Vs. Managing Committee of State Bank of India ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-16-2003
Reported in: 2004(1)ALT528
..... 3 2003 to the competent authority it appears that a report was called for from the sub divisional co operative officer and accordingly he ..... the quorum c if at any general meeting of the society called by the registrar himself under clause a in pursuance of the ..... only three members would remain in the committee which cannot be called as a valid committee it appears that the committee members have .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India Vs. Ms. Pratibha
Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh
Decided on: Apr-10-2003
..... rectified later on 21 3 1997 someone from the telecom department called to check up if this telephone was working satisfactorily and if ..... p or somebody else with his their connivance had made isd calls from the telephone of the complainant the district forum therefore partially ..... the district forum is right in ordering full rebate on isd calls charged in these bills and other related reliefs the appeal .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBharat Overseas Bank Ltd. Represented by Its General Manager Vs. the D ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-02-2003
Reported in: 2003(4)CTC641
..... of the second respondent cannot be countenanced as regards the non production of certain documents called for by the second respondent the learned counsel contended that wherever the petitioner was not ..... the reasoning of the first respondent in stating in one sentence that the relevant documents called for by the second respondent were deliberately not produced and therefore a conclusion should be .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR. Paulsamy and Gladys Lilly Vs. Superintendent, Narcotics Control Bur ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-01-2003
Reported in: 2003(162)ELT39(Mad)
..... m p w 51 raghavan superintendent recorded a statement from a person calling himself thillairajan son of thanuvan aged 25 years a resident of ..... that they were waiting for a bus to thiruparankundram and they were called by a 1 to be a witness it has been clearly ..... accused at no 41 d aloor road chungankadai and that the telephone calls were made from the residential telephone of the accused to the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN. Selvakumaaran, Vs. the Special Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Ch ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-29-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)CTC287
..... construction of gopuram etc should be done only by stapathis originally the second respondent called tender for construction of garpagraham arthamandapam and mahamandapam of the temple in the year ..... carrying out the construction of rajagopuram though the rule does not prohibit the respondents from calling for tenders from the eligible contractors it compels the authorities that the construction of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial