Skip to content


Calling - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: calling Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.101 seconds)
Jan 31 2003 (HC)

Xs Financial Services Ltd. and Megapro Investments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. N. De ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-31-2003

Reported in: AIR2003Mad369; (2003)1MLJ613

d murugesan j 1 this original side appeal is directed against the order of the learned single judge dated 03...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 10 2003 (FN)

McConnell Vs. Federal Election Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-10-2003

..... court in automobile workers the first such enactment responded to president theodore roosevelt s call for legislation forbidding all contributions by corporations to any political committee or for any ..... communication is that buckley drew a constitutionally mandated line between express advocacy and so called issue advocacy and that speakers possess an inviolable first amendment right to engage in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 29 2003 (HC)

Sstate Vs. Mohd. Afzal and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-29-2003

Reported in: 2003VIIAD(Delhi)1; 107(2003)DLT385; 2003(71)DRJ178; 2003(3)JCC1669

..... ex pw 36 3 at point x y the call number and calling number are the same but i d and imei ..... the receipt of the computer print outs of the telephone calls pertaining to telephone numbers 9811489429 9811489429 9811573506 9811573506 9810081228 9810081228 ..... shaukat one handsetwithout sim cardex pw61 4350102209452432 297 from the call details of the various telephone numbers the following position emerges .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 29 2003 (HC)

State. Vs. Mohd. Afzal and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-29-2003

..... y in ex pw 36 3 at point x y the call number and calling number are the same but i d and imei number ..... sharma deposed that on 14 12 2001 two cassettes pertaining to calls received on phone no 9810081228 and 9811573506 along with transcription and ..... 69th amendment act 1991 the union territory of delhi shall be called the national capital territory of delhi and the administrator thereof appointed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 17 2003 (TRI)

Asha Sharma and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Chandigarh

Decided on: Feb-17-2003

Reported in: (2003)(3)SLJ345CAT

..... a special messenger or delivered by courier service which would have ensured the delivery of call letters inspite of the decision aforesaid it is pity that the chandigarh administration did not ..... the respondent department was that it besides issuing a public notice should have sent the call letters through registered post or through messenger or through courier service as substantial number of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 16 2003 (HC)

A.R. Chowdhary and ors. Vs. Managing Committee of State Bank of India ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jul-16-2003

Reported in: 2004(1)ALT528

..... 3 2003 to the competent authority it appears that a report was called for from the sub divisional co operative officer and accordingly he ..... the quorum c if at any general meeting of the society called by the registrar himself under clause a in pursuance of the ..... only three members would remain in the committee which cannot be called as a valid committee it appears that the committee members have .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 10 2003 (TRI)

Union of India Vs. Ms. Pratibha

Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

Decided on: Apr-10-2003

..... rectified later on 21 3 1997 someone from the telecom department called to check up if this telephone was working satisfactorily and if ..... p or somebody else with his their connivance had made isd calls from the telephone of the complainant the district forum therefore partially ..... the district forum is right in ordering full rebate on isd calls charged in these bills and other related reliefs the appeal .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 02 2003 (HC)

Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd. Represented by Its General Manager Vs. the D ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-02-2003

Reported in: 2003(4)CTC641

..... of the second respondent cannot be countenanced as regards the non production of certain documents called for by the second respondent the learned counsel contended that wherever the petitioner was not ..... the reasoning of the first respondent in stating in one sentence that the relevant documents called for by the second respondent were deliberately not produced and therefore a conclusion should be .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 01 2003 (HC)

R. Paulsamy and Gladys Lilly Vs. Superintendent, Narcotics Control Bur ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-01-2003

Reported in: 2003(162)ELT39(Mad)

..... m p w 51 raghavan superintendent recorded a statement from a person calling himself thillairajan son of thanuvan aged 25 years a resident of ..... that they were waiting for a bus to thiruparankundram and they were called by a 1 to be a witness it has been clearly ..... accused at no 41 d aloor road chungankadai and that the telephone calls were made from the residential telephone of the accused to the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 29 2003 (HC)

N. Selvakumaaran, Vs. the Special Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Ch ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-29-2003

Reported in: 2003(3)CTC287

..... construction of gopuram etc should be done only by stapathis originally the second respondent called tender for construction of garpagraham arthamandapam and mahamandapam of the temple in the year ..... carrying out the construction of rajagopuram though the rule does not prohibit the respondents from calling for tenders from the eligible contractors it compels the authorities that the construction of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //