Calling - Judgment Search Results

Collins Vs. Youngblood

Court: US Supreme Court

collins v youngblood 497 u s 37 1990 u s supreme court collins v youngblood 497 u s 37 1990...

Walton Vs. Arizona

Court: US Supreme Court

..... several enumerated aggravating circumstances and that there are no mitigating circumstances sufficiently substantial to call for leniency the burden is on the prosecution to establish the existence of ..... that the defendant bears the burden of establishing mitigating circumstances sufficiently substantial to call for leniency i also conclude that arizona s heinous cruel or depraved aggravating .....

Perpich Vs. Dod

Court: US Supreme Court

..... montgomery amendment relies in part on the traditional understanding that the militia can only be called forth for three limited purposes that do not encompass either foreign service or nonemergency ..... constitutional text plainly indicates additional grants of power to congress the first empowers congress to call forth the militia to execute the laws of the union suppress insurrections and repel .....

M/S. Dabur India Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1990SC1814; 1990(49)ELT3(SC); JT1990(3)SC109; 1990(2)SCALE29; (1990)4SCC113; [1990]3SCR294

..... the central excise authorities however it is stated that the superintendent of state excise bulandshahr called upon the petitioner to furnish details in respect of homeodent including its ingredients and ..... the 1944 act and the duty had been paid accordingly subsequently the superintendent excise called upon the petitioner to furnish details about the quantity and value of homeodent manufactured .....

B.V. Khatawate Vs. Sub-divisional Officer, Telegraphs

Court: Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC

..... the complainant s advocate was good enough to furnish the details of the calls made by the complainant from 15 5 1989 to 1 6 1989 ..... complainant for that period hence the complainant cannot be charged anything for the calls made during that period the complainant is liable to pay the rent ..... of rs 253 plus trunk call charges of rs 116 i e in all rs 369 instead of .....

G.M. Mahanagar Telephones Nigam Ltd. Vs. Gulshan Rai

Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

..... respondent filed complaint alleging that he had been billed for excessive calls 3479 calls against telephone no 644 5481 and 2895 calls against telephone no 644 9230 and consequently prayed for relief ..... the local junction box have been connecting unsuspecting subscribers telephone numbers for overseas and std calls by businessmen and others for monetary gain it need hardly be stated that a .....

State Bank's Staff Union Vs. State Bank of India and Ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1992)1MLJ131

..... petitioner herein prays that this honourable court may be pleaded to call for the records relating to the circular of the third ..... been implemented this happened in july 1990 we could never call this period of bickerings and differences as a period when ..... guilty of dishonoring its commitments under a settlement whether it is called the understanding or the minutes of discussions the management took .....

State Bank's Staff Union (Madras Circle) Vs. the State Bank of India

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1991)ILLJ163Mad; (1992)IMLJ131

..... petitioner herein prays that this honourable court may be pleased to call for the records relating to the circular of the third ..... been implemented this happened in july 1990 we could never call this period of bickerings and differences as a period when ..... guilty of dishonouring its commitments under a settlement whether it is called the understanding or the minutes of discussions the management took .....

Palania Pillai and Another Vs. State

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1991CriLJ1563

..... supporting the expert s view the question in each case calls for determination on the court s appreciation of evidence ultimately ..... sitter in the same case the supreme court held that so called inner variations between the evidence of those two witnesses mahazar ..... view their evidence with suspicion but merely because they are called in to associate themselves with the investigation as they happened .....

M.S. Kuppuswami and Etc. Etc. Vs. the State

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1992CriLJ56

..... additional sessions judge special judge madras has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this court to call for the records and quash the proceedings in the aforestated calendar case as not ..... the merits of this argument since it is apparent that during investigation the petitioner was called upon to explain the disproportion found by the investigating officer and thereafter the wife daughter .....