Court : Kerala
..... not a criteria. but in the land use map, these classifications relating to the actual land use showing the agricultural operations and other operations were included. it was shown in the coastal management plan as f.p. because of the filtration pond and the ..... unless set aside by competent authority. (iv) he sought to draw support from the decision in rabindra nath ghosal v. university of calcutta (air 200.sc 3560.and smt. nilabati behera alias lalita behera v. state of orissa and others (1993 (2) scc746) ..... the existence of a lease. the court further held as follows: "as pointed out by lord macmillan in london and north eastern railway co. v. beriman, "where penalties for infringement are imposed it is not legitimate to stretch the language of a rule, however ..... island of 2011.ext.p.28: copies of the news report appeared in metro vartha dtd. 22/10/2011, mathrubhumi daily dtd. 24/10/2011, kerala kaumuidi daily dtd. 31/10/2011, vartha metro dtd. 04/11/2011, mangalam daily dtd. 8/11/2011 and kerala .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... of ecologically fragile lands) act, 2003; (viii) declare that the members of the first petitioner, including the 2nd petitioner whose lands have been vested by operation of section 3 of the kerala forest (vesting and management of ecologically fragile lands) act, 2003 are entitled to damages for wrongful dispossession of their lands ..... this case a settlement arrived at between the life insurance corporation and its employees had become the basis of a decision of the high court of calcutta. this settlement was sought to be scuttled by the corporation on the ground that they had received instructions from the central government that no payment ..... "resources included products of farm, forest, manufacture, art, education, etc. . . . the `resources' of a country include its land, timber, coal, crops, improvements, railways, factories and everything that goes to make up its wealth or to render it desirable." 68. explaining the concept of distribution under article 39(b) the following was laid down .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
..... to the interpretation of s.116. the section refers in express terms to the 'exercise' of religion, and therefore it is intended to protect from the operation of any commonwealth laws acts which are done in the exercise of religion. thus the section goes far beyond protecting liberty of opinion. it protects also acts ..... , all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propogate religion. (2) nothing in this article shall affect the operation of any existing law or prevent the state from making any law- (a) regulating or restricting any economic, financial, political or other secular activity which may be ..... 2011. exercising the powers under section 191(4) of the kerala panchayat raj act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1994 act") the government stayed the operation of the resolution dated 05.03.2011. the panchayat feeling aggrieved by the decision of the state government dated 19.03.2011 has filed this writ petition praying .....
Tag this Judgment!