Broadcasting - Judgment Search Results

T.V. Narayana, President, Arya Prathinidhi Sabha Vs. G. Devendranath a ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2000(6)ALD496; 2000(6)ALT506

order1 the petitioner herein is the president for a body called arya pratinidhi sabha andhra pradesh which is a society...

State of Karnataka Vs. Peter Prank

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: I(2001)ACC704; 2000CriLJ3516; ILR2000KAR2164; 2000(6)KarLJ20

..... influence of the second respondent petitioner s letter to the union minister for information and broadcasting alleging corruption misuse of official power etc by the second respondent granting or not granting .....

United States Vs. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of 1996 the government has ample constitutional and statutory authority to prohibit its broadcast entirely a governmental restriction on the distribution of obscene materials receives no first ..... cosponsor pointed out that numerous cable operators across the country are still automatically broadcasting sexually explicit programming into households across america regardless of whether parents want this .....

Adwave Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2000IIIAD(Delhi)154; 84(2000)DLT638; 2000(53)DRJ262

..... such as india trade promotion organisation indian air force northern railways ministry of information and broadcasting citi bank a list naming some of the reputed clients of the petitioner for whom ..... 1995 the petitioner understands that the respondent nos 1 and 2 exchanged correspondence on the broadcasting schedule of new format of the programme petitioner also understands that the respondent no 1 .....

Maganlal Savani and Another Vs. Rupam Pictures (P) Ltd. and Others

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR2000Bom416; 2000(3)ALLMR570; 2000(4)BomCR400; (2000)3BOMLR48; 2001(2)MhLj705

..... and solely and exclusively entitled to exploit and or exhibit and or broadcast the said film in any manner in any size sizes throughout ..... of them are entitled to exhibit and or exploit and or broadcast and or distribute in any manner by any means the suit ..... chupke by directly and or indirectly exhibiting and or exploiting and or broadcasting and or distributing and or causing it to be exhibited and .....

R.A. Goel Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR2000P& H320

..... passed at the behest of smt sushma swaraj the then union minister of information and broadcasting and that no circumstance existed which rendered it necessary to supersede the board in public ..... the haryana chamber of commerce and industry to the then union minister of information and broadcasting contained grievances in regard to the different departments of the state government including the board .....

C.C.E., Pune Vs. M/S. Philips India (Peico

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

..... by the appellants is for the purpose of reception of radio broadcasting but at the same time it is fitted with the equipment ..... appellants is capable of being used as receptive apparatus for radio broadcasting as far as this point is concerned it is admitted fact ..... fre 14 8527 00 reception apparatus 20 adv for radio broadcast 6 admittedly all the three items under consideration have reception apparatus .....

Nixon Vs. Shrink Missouri Government Pac

Court: US Supreme Court

..... treasury employees 513 u s 454 475 1995 in turn quoting turner broadcasting system inc v fcc 512 u s 622 664 1994 a ..... same first amendment interests of listeners or viewers see e g turner broadcasting system inc v fcc 520 u s 180 192 194 1997 ..... recognizing the speech interests of both viewers and cable operators columbia broadcasting system inc v democratic national committee 412 u s 94 102 103 .....

Erie Vs. Pap's A.andnbsp;M.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... harmful secondary effects cf e g fcc v national citizens comm for broadcasting 436 u s 775 the fact that this sort of leeway is ..... in reaching its expert judgment see fcc v national citizens comm for broadcasting 436 u s 775 1978 republic aviation corp v nlrb 324 u ..... and evidence is difficult to compile fcc v national citizens comm for broadcasting 436 u s 775 796 797 1978 and quite another to dispense .....

Fusebase Eltoro Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2000)(71)ECC113

..... m s fusebase eltoro ltd was not the same as the broadcast television receiver sets and was video projector for the purpose ..... m s fusebase eltoro ltd were not the same as broadcast television receiver sets for the purpose of exemption under notification ..... intent to avail incorrect concession exemption which was only applicable to broadcast television sets and not to video projector extended period of .....