Broadcasting - Judgment Search Results

United States Vs. Southwestern Cable Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... transmission the commission reasoned that catv systems are neither common carriers nor broadcasters and therefore are within neither of the principal regulatory categories created by ..... revenues significantly magnify the characteristically serious financial difficulties of uhf and educational television broadcasters footnote 44 the commission acknowledged that it could not predict with page .....

Fortnightly Corp. Vs. United Artists Television, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... this proceeding began the petitioner s systems provided customers with signals of five television broadcasting stations three located in pittsburgh pennsylvania one in steubenville ohio and one in wheeling ..... receives the electronic signals directly by means of telephone lines or microwave footnote 20 broadcasting is defined under the communications act of 1934 as the dissemination of radio .....

St. Amant Vs. Thompson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the new york times malice standard the louisiana supreme court ruled that st amant had broadcast false information about thompson recklessly though not knowingly several reasons were given for this conclusion ..... ahead heedless of the consequences and he mistakenly believed he had no responsibility for the broadcast because he was merely quoting albin s words these considerations fall short of proving .....

First Nat'l Bank Vs. Cities Service Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... contention that summary judgment against him was improper petitioner relies heavily upon poller v columbia broadcasting system inc 368 u s 464 1962 in poller the plaintiff claimed that cbs ..... this judgment cannot possibly be reconciled with this court s holding in poller v columbia broadcasting system supra there the court warned against using summary judgments to decide complex antitrust litigation .....

Whyy, Inc. Vs. Borough of Glassboro

Court: US Supreme Court

..... jersey syllabus appellant a pennsylvania nonprofit corporation operates a noncommercial television station it has broadcasting facilities in new jersey and has registered and qualified to transact business there ..... corporation organized under the laws of this or another state for the production and broadcasting of educational television the land whereon the buildings and structures are erected and .....

Ranjit Kumar Chatterjee Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1969Cal95

..... board v cannon brewery 1919 ac 744 at p 757 1950 1 kb 18 british broadcasting corpn v johns 1965 ch 32 the reason as explained in tamlin s case 1949 ..... corporation which carries on commercial functions such as the british transport corporation or the british broadcasting corpn 1965 ch 32 even though it may be presided over by a minister of .....

Sabbath Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... agents returned to jones the cocaine they had seized from him and placed a small broadcasting device on him the agents waited outside the building listening on a receiving apparatus jones ..... through the line because of noise from a phonograph in the apartment reception from the broadcasting device on jones person was poor but agents did hear the word package the customs .....

Permian BasIn Area Rate Cases

Court: US Supreme Court

..... dodge corp v labor board 313 u s 177 313 u s 193 194 national broadcasting co v united states 319 u s 190 american trucking assns v united states 344 ..... that are unreasonable or adverse to the public interest id at 67 but compare national broadcasting co v united states 319 u s 190 319 u s 216 footnote 60 this .....

Sri Mottayan Alias Ponnuswami Vs. Sri Thambuswami Padayachi and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1970)1MLJ137

..... case from canada in that case the validity of a lease under the canadian radio broadcasting act 1932 came up for consideration section 9 b of the act which empowered the ..... broadcasting commission to acquire existing private stations by lease gave an unrestricted and unconditional power in .....

Joseph D. Kunnappalli Vs. Superintendent of Post Offices and ors.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (1970)ILLJ457Ker

..... service rules 1964 the rule runs 20 criticism of governmentno employee shall is any radio broadcast or in any document publish anonymously or in his own name or in the name .....