Court : Delhi
..... , admittedly, not given option in his application form as to which central armed police force i.e. border security force; central industrial security force; central reserve wp (c) no.3847/2016 page 1 of 10 police force; sashastra seema bal or alternatively the assam rifles, he would opt to join.3. the petitioner having secured 61 marks, was not appointed. he has preferred this petition, inter alia, on ..... candidates, who have failed to submit their option or submitted invalid preferences, uniformly and therefore, no discrimination was made with the... petitioner. it is the responsibility of the... petitioner to act as per provisions of notice of the examination and if he fails in doing so, he himself is responsible for non compliance of provisions of notice of the examination for .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... or any class of such officers with the powers of an officer-in-charge of a police station for the investigation of the offences under this act. (2) the state government may, by notification published in ..... act, 1985 (ndps act). section 53 of the ndps act reads as follows: 53. power to invest officers of certain departments with powers of an officer-in-charge of a police station. (1) the central government, after consultation with the state government may, by notification published in the official gazette, invest any officer of the department of central excise, narcotics, customs, revenue intelligence or border security force ..... 19 thereof.55. at the same time, section 71 of the act provides that the provisions of this act shall have effect, notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any law for the time being in force. the pmla seeks to check and punish the activity of money .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... us any longer.29. the respondents have also made a complaint that the said jawan had indulged in several other acts of indiscipline. inasmuch as these acts are the subject matter of consideration by the respondents in accordance with the provisions of the border security force act, we are not required to go into the matter. we refrain from commenting thereon.30. we note that it ..... . versus union of india & ors. .....respondents through : mr. sanjay jain, asg with mr. gaurang kanth, adv. coram: hon'ble the acting chief justice hon'ble ms. justice anu malhotra judgment (oral) gita mittal, acting chief justice1 this writ petition against the entire border security force and authorities, purporting to be in public interest, is premised on the unsubstantiated, bald statements in a video which went .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... the petitioners was with reference to different upper age limits prescribed in the border security force, central industrial security force etc. there can be variation in the upper age limits, as recruitment rules for different forces as per requirements, can vary. in several forces, there is a separate limited ldce quota, in addition to promotion ..... examination (ldce). the quota is nothing but promotion and cannot be equated with direct recruitment. accordingly, the submission is that the respondents have acted illogically and arbitrarily by reducing the upper age limit for departmental candidates for 10% reserved quota in the direct recruitment category from 40 years to ..... the government has deliberately and intentionally applied the amended rules. the challenge on the ground of alleged violation of section 147 of the delhi police act was repulsed.8. the tribunal thereafter for the reasons recorded gave the following directions:-"though mrs. avnish ahlawat, 31. learned counsel has given .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... the staff selection commission would hold a competitive examination on 12.01.2003 for recruitment of sub inspectors in the border security force, central industrial security force, central reserve police force and indo tibetan border police force. =====================================================================. wp(c) no.2810/2016 page 2 of 22 4. the petitioners duly appeared for the aforesaid ..... the respondents to extend the benefit of the old pension scheme to the petitioners.2. the petitioners, who are inspectors in the border security force had applied for recruitment in the central police organisation pursuant to an advertisement issued by the staff selection commission in the employment news ..... unnecessarily delayed constitution of a review medical board. had the respondent authorities and in particular staff selection commission acted with diligence, the petitioners could have been appointed within 31.12.2003.15. the advertisements were for appointment of sub inspectors to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... hon'ble mr. justice anil kumar chawla indira banerjee, j judgment1 the short question involved in this writ petition is whether the summary security force court constituted under section 64 of the border security force act 1968, was justified in imposing on the petitioner the sentence of rigorous imprisonment for 6 months in civil prison and dismissal from service ..... 3 of 10 7. on or about 12.05.2005, the petitioner made a statutory petition to the respondent no.2 under section 117 of the border security force act. the statutory petition was rejected by an order dated 26th october 2005.8. in this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the sentence of the summary ..... court as revised by the dig station headquarters as also the order dated 26.10.2005 of the director-general border security force rejecting the statutory petition filed by the petitioner.9. from the record of evidence it appears that about four witnesses were examined. one j.r. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... be deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case. facts:-"2. the petitioner was enrolled in the border security force on february 15, 1991. after completing the training, he joined his unit on january 31, 1993. for certain acts, the petitioner was proceeded by ssfc on charges under section 20(b), 20(c), 19(f) and 26 ..... of the bsf act, which resulted in the punishment of dismissal from service. the statutory petition filed by the petitioner with the directorate general, border security force was also rejected vide the order dated february 28, 2005. it is noted from the record that the ..... impugned ssfc trail proceedings by which the petitioner has been sentenced to dismissal from service vide annexure p-5 (colly) as well as ministry of home affairs, directorate general border security force letter dated feb 2005, upholding the said findings and sentence. w.p. (c) 4810/2015 page 1 of 28 (ii) issue a writ in the nature .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... to which they had sought appointment. the petitioner s sixth option, as per the form, was the ministry of road transport and highways.3. the petitioner had secured 114.5 marks in the examination w.p.(c) no.12293/2015 page 1 of 3 which, did not qualify him for his first, second, third and fifth ..... road transport & highways, seema sadak bhawan, delhi 110010 for appointment as ldcs. the petitioner contends that the border roads organisation to which he has been nominated, consists of the border roads development board and the general reserve engineering force (gref), which is administratively a part of ministry of defence and not a part of ministry of road transport ..... entirely different. the supreme court observed members of the gref were governed by both the central civil services (classification control and appeal) rules, 1965 and the army act, 1956.11. in view of the aforesaid, the writ petition has no merit and is accordingly dismissed. there would be no order as to costs. february17 2017 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... joined the commission as an accountant on 21st august, 2005 on deputation basis. prior to that, s.s. gosain was holding an analogous post of sub-inspector (ministerial) in the border security force (bsf) since 21st may, 1999. in other words, s.s. gosain had six years regular service in the identical grade before he had joined the commission on deputation. the selection ..... allowed.2. to appreciate the controversy and the lis, we would first refer to the relevant facts.3. the national human rights commission has been constituted under the human rights act, 1993. anil kumar joshi was appointed as a junior accountant with the commission on 4th april, 1996. the next post in the hierarchy is that of accountant. s.s. gosain .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... itself, the complainant executed the required documents for availing the loan facility and alleged that she was unaware of any enhancement of the loan amount. upon being served notice under sarfaesi act by the andhra bank, the complainant received the information regarding recalling of the loan facility. it was further alleged by the complainant in the fir bail application no.140/2017 ..... recovery proceeding by attaching the property of the complainant.10. in view of the seriousness of the allegations levelled as well as the fact that crores of rupees of the secured creditor i.e. bank is at stake and the forgery of documents, this court does not find this a fit case for grant of concession of anticipatory bail.11. in .....
Tag this Judgment!