Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 83 law officer Sorted by: recent Page 10 of about 48,195 results (0.314 seconds)

Aug 02 2018 (HC)

Ajeet Kumar vs.uoi and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... 10) by promotion (6) not applicable (7) not applicable (8) not applicable (9) not applicable (11) the a service and possessing promotion- deputy commandant of border security force with five years regular service in the grade with total ten years group following qualification, namely:-"(a) should have successfully completed pre-promotional course or courses as prescribed by the ..... not remedying the manner in which they had acted, had necessitated filing of unwarranted writ petitions.9. pursuant to the aforesaid observations of the court, the petitioner s representation, upon being duly recommended by the ..... the eligibility condition of service of two years in a duty battalion. the court was constrained to observe that the respondents had not only failed to act in accordance with the principles laid down in its judgment dated 27.10.2009 in the case of ashok kumar (supra), but even their action in .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 25 2018 (HC)

ex.link Vishav Priya Singh vs.uoi

Court : Delhi

..... ct. kalu ram (supra) and chokha ram (supra) are concerned, in chokha ram (supra), the coordinate bench of this court while considering the provisions of the border security force rules, 1969, has inter-alia held that not obtaining the signatures of the charged officer on the plea of guilt cannot be w.p.(c) no.2511/1992 ..... matter to the then commanding officer for using insubordinate language against havaldar udhav kamble and the petitioner was charged for an offence under section 63 of the army act. instead of answering to the charge, the petitioner alleged favouritism and discrimination. he also stated that he would not accept the commanding officer s punishment and ..... government is not illegal and is within the powers of the central government. the petitioner had submitted a petition under section 164(2) of the army act 1950 against the findings and sentence awarded by the scm. the government of india after due consideration of the petition had directed that the punishment of dismissal .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 23 2018 (HC)

Inspector Jaswant Singh vs.union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... ) as well as the annulment of the gsfc proceedings. he further sought for declaration of rule 129 of the border security force (hereinafter referred as bsf ) rules, 1969 as unconstitutional and for restoration of the original status of the petitioner as ..... on record.8. on perusal of the factual exposition, it is quite vivid that the petitioner was sentenced by the general security force court on 09.02.2004 which was confirmed by inspector general vide order dated 24.04.2004. the pre-confirmation petition before ..... to a party by this extraordinary remedy of mandamus....learned counsel is right in his submission that the provisions of the limitation act do not as such apply to the granting of relief under art 226. it appears w.p.(c) 1312/2018 page ..... past service for the purpose of pension. c) to be severely reprimanded.3. the statutory petition under the section 117 of bsf act read with the provision of rule 167 of bsf rules was made by the petitioner before the inspector general bsf on 10.02. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 2018 (HC)

Arvind Kumar Saxena vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... whatever reason during this interregnum. there could be a situation (however rare) where an accused is not prepared to be bailed out perhaps for his personal security since he or she might be facing some threat outside the correction home or for any other reason. but then in such an event, the accused voluntarily ..... in contravention of any provision of this act or any rule or order made or condition of licence granted thereunder, manufactures, sells, purchases, transports, imports inter-state, exports inter-state or uses any manufactured ..... possession of 250 gms. heroine by the petitioner would if proved make the petitioner culpable for commission of the offence punishable u/s 21(b) of the ndps act, 1985 which provides as follows :-"bail appln. 2238/2017 page 5 of 22 21. punishment for contravention in relation to manufactured drugs and preparations - whoever, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2017 (HC)

Niit Technologies Limited vs.directorate General, Border Security For ...

Court : Delhi

..... p. 481/2017 niit technologies limited date of decision:19. h december, 2017 .....petitioner through: mr.vikas dutta & mr.siddharth chander joshi, advs. versus directorate general, border security force ..... respondent through: mr.praveen kumar jain, adv. alongwith mrb.s. rautela, ac of respondent coram: hon'ble mr. justice navin chawla navin chawla, j.(oral) 1. ..... relating to any matter arising out of or connected with the contract, such dispute or difference shall be settled in accordance with the indian arbitration and conciliation act, 1996. clause 20(xx) - arbitration proceedings shall be held at new delhi, india and the language of the arbitration proceedings and that of all ..... contention of the respondent to the effect that the respondent having already appointed an arbitrator, this court will cease to have jurisdiction under section 11 of the act to appoint an arbitrator, is hereby rejected.10. as far as the second contention of the respondent, relying upon the clause 24(iii) of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 2017 (HC)

Dr. Varunveer vs.financial Commissioner, Delhi and Ors

Court : Delhi

..... no dispute that the petitioner s vehicle had been used for transportation of liquor and that itself was sufficient to justify its confiscation under section 58 of the act. the financial commissioner also held that the decision of the learned metropolitan magistrate acquitting the driver of the vehicle and the petitioner of an offence under section ..... the court of metropolitan magistrate has also acquitted both, the driver of the vehicle (jai singh) and the petitioner of an offence under section 33 of the act principally on the ground that the evidence of independent witnesses, who were present at the site had not been produced. without going into the merits of the said ..... the liquor was being transported without permit in the vehicle on the day of its seizure and, therefore, seizure of the said vehicle under section 58 of the act was justified.6. mr s.n. gupta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has assailed the impugned order essentially on two grounds. first, he submits that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2017 (HC)

Nema Singh Otti vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... court, an order dated 23.03.2012 was passed by the respondents terminating his services by passing a dismissal under section 10 of border security force act, 1968, read with rule 23 (a) of the border security force rules, 1969. after being acquitted, the w.p.(c) 463/2017 page 2 of 6 petitioner submitted a representation dated 02.05 ..... filed the present petition aggrieved by the order dated 22.01.2016, informing him that his case for promotion to the rank of deputy commandant in the border security force(hereinafter referred to as bsf) by way of relaxation in qualifying mandatory command and logistic course had been examined by the competent authority and was rejected. ..... and one chamanlal under section 21, 25, 61 & 85 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances (ndps) act and under section 489 (c) of ipc, for their alleged involvement in smuggling of four kg of narcotics from the border outpost at jammu & kashmir. after conclusion of trial, vide judgment dated 05.11.2011 the learned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 2017 (HC)

Chander Mohan Dhingra vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

..... report (ex.pw-14/a) reflects that nine injuries of various dimensions were caused to the victim harnam dass dhingra. cause of death was cranio cerebral damage consequent upon blunt force impact which was sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature. pw-13 (dr.ashok dua) crl.a. 894/2015 page 6 of 7 medically examined pw-4 ..... attempt to commit suicide. no credible evidence has emerged to infer if the appellant was suffering from any mental disorder or he was not aware of the consequences of the act whereby he inflicted injuries not only to the victim harnam dass dhingra but also to his mother pw-4 (kailash dhingra). victim was earlier inflicted injuries with a musli ; thereafter .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2017 (HC)

Vinod Kumar Vs. Union of India Through the Home Secretary Department o ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... year 2006 the rules for technical cadre came into existence which is known as border security force motor transport workshop (non gazetted) group c posts recruitment rules, 2006 (for short hereinafter referred to as the rules, 2006 ) enacted under the border security force act, 1968. as per this rule cut off date was 21st september, 2006. ..... dated 9th january, 2001 (annexure 2 to the memo of this letters patent appeal) he was appointed as a constable in border security force. there are varieties of constables in the border security force for which the qualifications are also different, but, the facts remains that appointment on a technical post is altogether different. it ..... mainly for the following facts and reasons: (i) this appellant is original petitioner who applied for the post of constable (general duty) in the border security force in pursuance of the public advertisement dated 2 nd october, 2000 as he was certificate holder of industrial training institute (iti). he was also doing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 20 2017 (HC)

Sunil Kumar Vs. Union of India and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... tc&s bsf, hazaribagh, jharkhand (annexure 1), consequent upon the summary security force court convicted the petitioner for the offence under section 40 of the border security force act, 1968 for an act prejudicial to good order and discipline of the force and sentenced him to be dismissed from service. the petitioner has been struck ..... - bhojpur (bihar) ... petitioner versus 1. the union of india 2. ministry of home affairs, inspector general, border security force, block no. 10, lodi road, new delhi 3. the commandant, special training school, training centre & school, border security force, hazaribagh 4. d.i.g.-cum- commandant, b.s.f., meru, hazaribagh ...... respondents for the petitioner : ..... submitted that this writ application has been filed suppressing material fact that the petitioner has submitted statutory petition against his conviction by summary security force court and the same was duly considered and rejected by the director general of bsf vide his dated 31st july, 2008 and the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //