Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 83 law officer Sorted by: recent Court: karnataka dharwad Page 1 of about 67 results (0.086 seconds)

Nov 17 2015 (HC)

Suresh Dhareppa Mutnal Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... split-up against accused no.1, as he had absconded during the pendency of the case before the court below. the presence of the said accused having been secured after the trial and conviction of accused no.2 to 4 in case no.sc3782011, a fresh trial was conducted in so far as the appellant was concerned. ..... it is not true that my son and i were also involved in keeping the police in confinement. sadashiv dange suspected us of having informed the police about his acts. after the said incident, a police van was regularly stationed at itnal village. we were released on bail. we are shepherds (kurubas) by caste. the majority of ..... furtherance of their common intention the accused channappa mutnal contravened the conditions of licence of revolver and thereby committed an offence punishable under section 30 of the indian arms act?. the above were answered in the affirmative and the accused were convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment and fine for the offence punishable under section 302, apart .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2015 (HC)

Suresh Dhareppa Mutnal and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka by its St ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... at a finding of guilt, on the basis of the above evidence, which cannot be faulted. in the second trial, after the presence of accused no. 1 was secured, apart from the evidence of the complainant, examined as pw-1, one hussain paschapur who was examined as pw-2 at both the trials, and who had flatly ..... furtherance of their common intention the accused channappa mutnal contravened the conditions of licence of revolver and thereby committed an offence punishable under section 30 of the indian arms act? ? the above were answered in the affirmative and the accused were convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment and fine for the offence punishable under section 302, apart ..... accused for offences punishable under sections 302 and 201 of the indian penal code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the ipcfor brevity) and section 30 of the arms act, 1959. the accused are said to have pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. the prosecution had then examined 36 witnesses and had got marked several .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 05 2024 (HC)

Sri Raghavendraswamy Mutt Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... such document is kept substantially in the form required by law and is produced from proper custody. 26.7. a perusal of section 81 of indian evidence act, extracted hereinabove, would indicate that the court shall presume the genuineness of every document, be it official gazette or government gazette printed by the queens printer, which ..... -v- smt.chanderjoti debi and others6 air1996patna 110, particularly para 31 thereof, which is reproduced hereunder for easy reference:31. section 21 of the evidence act states that admissions are relevant and may be proved as against the persons who makes them, or his representative in interest; but they cannot be proved by ..... be what constitutes religious rite.2. places of worship (special provisions) act, 1991 does not debar those cases where declaration is sought for a period prior to the act came into force or for enforcement of right which was recognised before coming into force of the act.3. the following findings in moran mar basselios (supra) have .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 05 2024 (HC)

Shri Uttaradi Mutt Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... such document is kept substantially in the form required by law and is produced from proper custody. 26.7. a perusal of section 81 of indian evidence act, extracted hereinabove, would indicate that the court shall presume the genuineness of every document, be it official gazette or government gazette printed by the queens printer, which ..... -v- smt.chanderjoti debi and others6 air1996patna 110, particularly para 31 thereof, which is reproduced hereunder for easy reference:31. section 21 of the evidence act states that admissions are relevant and may be proved as against the persons who makes them, or his representative in interest; but they cannot be proved by ..... be what constitutes religious rite.2. places of worship (special provisions) act, 1991 does not debar those cases where declaration is sought for a period prior to the act came into force or for enforcement of right which was recognised before coming into force of the act.3. the following findings in moran mar basselios (supra) have .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2024 (HC)

Sri.channappa S/o Gangaram Balaganur Vs. The Management Of Nwkrtc

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... or retrenched in connection with or as a consequence of a dispute.10. four categories of workmen are excluded: (a) persons subject to the air force act, the army act or the navy act; (b) persons who are employed in the police service; (c) persons employed as officers or those employees who are in a managerial or administrative capacity ..... selection authority shall prepare the list of candidates eligible for appointment as per the government orders issued in this behalf and are in force from time to time, and if more than one candidate secures equal marks, the order of merit in respect of such candidates shall be on the basis of their age, the person or ..... persons older in age being placed higher in the order of merit. (iv) the candidates who satisfy the requirements for the posts of security guard shall be called to appear before the selection authority or any other officer authorised by the chairman of the selection authority for personal verification of physical standards .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2024 (HC)

Sri.pundappa S/o Amoghappa Karagar Vs. The North West Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... or retrenched in connection with or as a consequence of a dispute.10. four categories of workmen are excluded: (a) persons subject to the air force act, the army act or the navy act; (b) persons who are employed in the police service; (c) persons employed as officers or those employees who are in a managerial or administrative capacity ..... selection authority shall prepare the list of candidates eligible for appointment as per the government orders issued in this behalf and are in force from time to time, and if more than one candidate secures equal marks, the order of merit in respect of such candidates shall be on the basis of their age, the person or ..... persons older in age being placed higher in the order of merit. (iv) the candidates who satisfy the requirements for the posts of security guard shall be called to appear before the selection authority or any other officer authorised by the chairman of the selection authority for personal verification of physical standards .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2024 (HC)

Sri.chandrakant S/o Husanappa Moolimani, Vs. The Management Of Nwkrtc, ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... or retrenched in connection with or as a consequence of a dispute.10. four categories of workmen are excluded: (a) persons subject to the air force act, the army act or the navy act; (b) persons who are employed in the police service; (c) persons employed as officers or those employees who are in a managerial or administrative capacity ..... selection authority shall prepare the list of candidates eligible for appointment as per the government orders issued in this behalf and are in force from time to time, and if more than one candidate secures equal marks, the order of merit in respect of such candidates shall be on the basis of their age, the person or ..... persons older in age being placed higher in the order of merit. (iv) the candidates who satisfy the requirements for the posts of security guard shall be called to appear before the selection authority or any other officer authorised by the chairman of the selection authority for personal verification of physical standards .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2024 (HC)

Basanagouda Vs. The Divisional Controller

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... or retrenched in connection with or as a consequence of a dispute.10. four categories of workmen are excluded: (a) persons subject to the air force act, the army act or the navy act; (b) persons who are employed in the police service; (c) persons employed as officers or those employees who are in a managerial or administrative capacity ..... selection authority shall prepare the list of candidates eligible for appointment as per the government orders issued in this behalf and are in force from time to time, and if more than one candidate secures equal marks, the order of merit in respect of such candidates shall be on the basis of their age, the person or ..... persons older in age being placed higher in the order of merit. (iv) the candidates who satisfy the requirements for the posts of security guard shall be called to appear before the selection authority or any other officer authorised by the chairman of the selection authority for personal verification of physical standards .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2024 (HC)

Vitthal Dasar S/o. Hanumantappa Vs. The Divisional Controller

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... or retrenched in connection with or as a consequence of a dispute.10. four categories of workmen are excluded: (a) persons subject to the air force act, the army act or the navy act; (b) persons who are employed in the police service; (c) persons employed as officers or those employees who are in a managerial or administrative capacity ..... selection authority shall prepare the list of candidates eligible for appointment as per the government orders issued in this behalf and are in force from time to time, and if more than one candidate secures equal marks, the order of merit in respect of such candidates shall be on the basis of their age, the person or ..... persons older in age being placed higher in the order of merit. (iv) the candidates who satisfy the requirements for the posts of security guard shall be called to appear before the selection authority or any other officer authorised by the chairman of the selection authority for personal verification of physical standards .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Basavaraj S/o. Mahabaleshwar Jiglur Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... the letter addressed to the doctor as per ex.p82. as per the directions of his superior officer, he tried to secure the presence of the accused. as per the information received based on the mobile sim number, he came to know ..... abraded contusion measuring 6cms extending till injury no.18.22. abraded contusion measuring 25cms present over back of chest, extending from inner border of left shoulder girdle(scapula) to top of right shoulder, 2cms above injury no.19.-. 42 - nc:2024. khc- ..... conviction and order of sentence passed against him by the trial court.8. learned counsel for the appellant-accused, with all force, submits that this case is purely based on circumstantial evidence and there is no eyewitness. when the case is - 8 ..... the accused in the commission of the crime.77. while appreciating evidence as required under section 3 of the indian evidence act, more particularly, circumstantial evidence, in a case of present nature i.e. murder, when the prosecution relies upon circumstantial .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //