Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 50 combination of punishments Sorted by: recent Year: 2017 Page 2 of about 20 results (0.238 seconds)

Aug 29 2017 (HC)

Christopher Kujur Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Aug-29-2017

..... but a school i.e. temple of learning. even a similar act of this nature would have serious implication. in the case of ramvir singh versus union of india reported in (2009) 3 scc97the appellant in that case was working as a constable in the border security force. penalty of removal from service was imposed upon him on account of ..... its position in chandra kumar chopra versus union of india & ors. reported in (2012) 6 scc369wherein it has been held that primary obligation of a member of armed forces is to maintain discipline in all aspects. it has been held that the doctrine of proportionality is uninvocable. in case of s.r.tewari versus union of india & ..... he was held guilty by the enquiry officer and was awarded punishment pursuant to the practice followed in the force just to keep the force disciplined and to deter the members of the force for not indulging in such type of act.6. considering the above submissions of the parties as well as materials brought on record, it appears that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 2017 (HC)

Aez Infratech Pvt Ltd vs.vibha Goel & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-23-2017

..... has the effect of cancelling the agreement to sell dated 09.09.2009. the award also rejected the contention of the petitioner that the agreement to sell is a security document. on the issue of limitation, the award rejected the contention of the petitioner that the limitation period commenced from 01.06.2010. it noted that there ..... was entered into whereby the respondent agreed to buy two shops and received rs.1,41,148/-. it was further stated that the agreement to sell is only a security agreement and conferred no rights on the respondent. it was also pleaded that the claim of the respondent is barred by limitation.6. the learned arbitrator framed the ..... lines in the claim petition to interpret the agreement dated 09.09.2009 is a mischievous act. the plea is utterly frivolous. even otherwise, admittedly the loan has not been repaid by aerens builders private limited. hence, even assuming it was a security document; the plea is of no defence to the petitioners and has been rightly rejected by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 2017 (HC)

Satish Kumar and Ors vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-21-2017

..... them without considering them for permanent absorption as per bsf rule-2012. wp (c) 3969/2016 page 1 of 7 2. the petitioners had joined the border security force (bsf) as constable(s) (general duty) on different dates between 1995 to 2002 and based on their technical qualifications were selected for deputation to the post ..... upon issuance of notice, the respondent bsf, has filed its counter affidavit. it has been submitted that as per section 44 of the disaster management act, 2005, a national disaster response force (ndrf) was constituted under the superintendence, direction and wp (c) 3969/2016 page 2 of 7 control of the national disaster management authority ..... the petitioners for their consideration for absorption is concerned, we agree with the submission of the respondents that ndrf being a separate force constituted under the disaster management act, the said force cannot be held to be a part of the bsf. ndrf is governed by its own recruitment rules and more specifically the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 11 2017 (HC)

... Plaintiff Vs. Samarendra Kumar Bardhan

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-11-2017

..... . the shares which were given to dharmaraja kadamba and raviraja kadamba were in possession of tenants and vested in the state government after coming into force of karnataka land reforms (amendment) act, 1973 whereas the properties which had been given to the daughters were in the personal cultivation of the family. the testator while executing the will ..... to some extent: the mind was apt to take a pleasure in adapting circumstances to one another and even in straining them a little, if need be, to force them to form parts of one connected whole, and the more ingenuous the mind of the individual, the more likely was it, considering such matters, to overreach ..... plaintiff supports the execution of the will by the testator and it suggests the fulfillment of all the requirements laid down under section 63 of the indian succession act. the attesting witnesses have identified the signature of the testator in the will. they have also identified each other s signature in the will, although, one .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 12 2017 (HC)

R. Kempamma and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, Department of Panch ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-12-2017

..... and others referred above arises under a different set of circumstances where the land had to be earmarked for the purpose of itbp i.e., indo tibetan border police force. this court has found that the decision taken for allotment of the said land by reducing the gomal land in the facts of the said case was ..... union of india represented by its secretary, home department, new delhi and others - 2012(2) kccr 1133. 5. learned additional government advocate who was directed to secure the records has made available the records. she submits that there was no occasion for the deputy commissioner to issue any public notice or hear any objections of the villagers ..... respondent - deputy commissioner, bangalore urban district, bangalore on 26.11.2016 vide annexure-e exercising his power under section 71 of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 (for short 'the act') thereby de-reserving an extent of 2 acres 20 guntas of land comprised in sy.no.116 earmarked as government gomal land for the purpose of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2017 (HC)

Simtaz Khan Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-11-2017

..... ) harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand. (emphasis given by me) 13. section 198 a code of criminal ..... an offence punishable under section 498 a i.p.c., it is not a sine qua non that the victim has to be the wife. again this interpretation also finds force from the recital of section 198 a of the code of criminal procedure where also the victim is referred to as 'the person aggrieved by the offence' and not ..... the revision petitioner for the offence punishable under section 498 a is set aside while the conviction of revision petitioner for the offence punishable under section 4 of dowry prohibition act, 1961 is maintained but the sentence is modified to the period in custody already undergone by the revision petitioner. in view of the modification of sentence as indicated above, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 22 2017 (HC)

Government of Karnataka Vs. Ngef Limited (In Liquidation)

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-22-2017

..... of the company from the register maintained by the registrar of companies be issued under section 560 of the act, which amounts to the death of the juristic person i.e. the limited company. the purpose is to secure and safeguard the assets of the company which has defaulted in payment of its admitted liabilities and under other ..... contingencies as envisaged in section 433 of the act, under which the winding up order is passed by the court, other than a ..... this stage subject to the compliance of the solemn undertaking given by the state before this court. it has already been noted above that none of the creditors, secured or unsecured or official liquidator have put forth any objection before this court, except a minuscule number of workmen and the minority share holder, the german company. as .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 18 2017 (HC)

Pankaj Kumar vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-18-2017

..... , admittedly, not given option in his application form as to which central armed police force i.e. border security force; central industrial security force; central reserve wp (c) no.3847/2016 page 1 of 10 police force; sashastra seema bal or alternatively the assam rifles, he would opt to join.3. the petitioner having secured 61 marks, was not appointed. he has preferred this petition, inter alia, on ..... candidates, who have failed to submit their option or submitted invalid preferences, uniformly and therefore, no discrimination was made with the... petitioner. it is the responsibility of the... petitioner to act as per provisions of notice of the examination and if he fails in doing so, he himself is responsible for non compliance of provisions of notice of the examination for .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 08 2017 (HC)

Vakamulla Chandrashekhar vs.enforcement Directorate & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-08-2017

..... or any class of such officers with the powers of an officer-in-charge of a police station for the investigation of the offences under this act. (2) the state government may, by notification published in ..... act, 1985 (ndps act). section 53 of the ndps act reads as follows: 53. power to invest officers of certain departments with powers of an officer-in-charge of a police station. (1) the central government, after consultation with the state government may, by notification published in the official gazette, invest any officer of the department of central excise, narcotics, customs, revenue intelligence or border security force ..... 19 thereof.55. at the same time, section 71 of the act provides that the provisions of this act shall have effect, notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any law for the time being in force. the pmla seeks to check and punish the activity of money .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 05 2017 (HC)

Puran Chand Arya vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-05-2017

..... us any longer.29. the respondents have also made a complaint that the said jawan had indulged in several other acts of indiscipline. inasmuch as these acts are the subject matter of consideration by the respondents in accordance with the provisions of the border security force act, we are not required to go into the matter. we refrain from commenting thereon.30. we note that it ..... . versus union of india & ors. .....respondents through : mr. sanjay jain, asg with mr. gaurang kanth, adv. coram: hon'ble the acting chief justice hon'ble ms. justice anu malhotra judgment (oral) gita mittal, acting chief justice1 this writ petition against the entire border security force and authorities, purporting to be in public interest, is premised on the unsubstantiated, bald statements in a video which went .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //