Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Sep-14-2017
..... advocate for the respondents responded to the submission of the petitioner on furnishing the wrong information at the time of employment by saying that if the employment is secured by adopting fraudulent practice giving incorrect and wrong information, it constitutes a serious misconduct as held by the supreme court in case of union of india & ..... for the purpose of ascertaining whether there was any delay on the part of the board in initiating disciplinary proceedings against the appellant has no merit and force. the stand now taken by the respondent in this court in the counter-affidavit is not convincing and is only an afterthought to give some explanation for ..... as 10.08.1961 at the time of seeking such employment. after such appointment, the service book was prepared, which includes form b prescribed in the mines act and rules and the particulars recorded therein should be verified by the employee and to certify that the information recorded therein are true and correct. admittedly, the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Aug-11-2017
..... . the shares which were given to dharmaraja kadamba and raviraja kadamba were in possession of tenants and vested in the state government after coming into force of karnataka land reforms (amendment) act, 1973 whereas the properties which had been given to the daughters were in the personal cultivation of the family. the testator while executing the will ..... to some extent: the mind was apt to take a pleasure in adapting circumstances to one another and even in straining them a little, if need be, to force them to form parts of one connected whole, and the more ingenuous the mind of the individual, the more likely was it, considering such matters, to overreach ..... plaintiff supports the execution of the will by the testator and it suggests the fulfillment of all the requirements laid down under section 63 of the indian succession act. the attesting witnesses have identified the signature of the testator in the will. they have also identified each other s signature in the will, although, one .....
Tag this Judgment!