Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-15-2017
..... hon'ble mr. justice anil kumar chawla indira banerjee, j judgment1 the short question involved in this writ petition is whether the summary security force court constituted under section 64 of the border security force act 1968, was justified in imposing on the petitioner the sentence of rigorous imprisonment for 6 months in civil prison and dismissal from service ..... 3 of 10 7. on or about 12.05.2005, the petitioner made a statutory petition to the respondent no.2 under section 117 of the border security force act. the statutory petition was rejected by an order dated 26th october 2005.8. in this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the sentence of the summary ..... court as revised by the dig station headquarters as also the order dated 26.10.2005 of the director-general border security force rejecting the statutory petition filed by the petitioner.9. from the record of evidence it appears that about four witnesses were examined. one j.r. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-04-2017
..... chawla sanjiv khanna, j.(oral): this is the second round by the petitioner, who is an ex- constable in the border security force (bsf).2. the petitioner was tried vide general security force court on six charges, including four charges under section 46 of the border security force act, 1968 for committing murder of three bangladeshi nationals and for attempting to take life of another bangladesh civilian after entering ..... .8. on or about 13th december, 2016, the petitioner made a representation to the director general, bsf for annulment of the general security force court. in addition to factual assertions, the petitioner had alleged violation of rule 60 of the border security force rules, 1969.9. the aforesaid representation was considered and has been rejected vide order dated 31st january, 2017.10. the petitioner has .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Nov-22-2017
..... year 2006 the rules for technical cadre came into existence which is known as border security force motor transport workshop (non gazetted) group c posts recruitment rules, 2006 (for short hereinafter referred to as the rules, 2006 ) enacted under the border security force act, 1968. as per this rule cut off date was 21st september, 2006. ..... dated 9th january, 2001 (annexure 2 to the memo of this letters patent appeal) he was appointed as a constable in border security force. there are varieties of constables in the border security force for which the qualifications are also different, but, the facts remains that appointment on a technical post is altogether different. it ..... mainly for the following facts and reasons: (i) this appellant is original petitioner who applied for the post of constable (general duty) in the border security force in pursuance of the public advertisement dated 2 nd october, 2000 as he was certificate holder of industrial training institute (iti). he was also doing .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-05-2017
..... us any longer.29. the respondents have also made a complaint that the said jawan had indulged in several other acts of indiscipline. inasmuch as these acts are the subject matter of consideration by the respondents in accordance with the provisions of the border security force act, we are not required to go into the matter. we refrain from commenting thereon.30. we note that it ..... . versus union of india & ors. .....respondents through : mr. sanjay jain, asg with mr. gaurang kanth, adv. coram: hon'ble the acting chief justice hon'ble ms. justice anu malhotra judgment (oral) gita mittal, acting chief justice1 this writ petition against the entire border security force and authorities, purporting to be in public interest, is premised on the unsubstantiated, bald statements in a video which went .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Jan-10-2017
..... husband of petitioner no. 1 while working as assistant 2 sub-inspector (clerk), a proceeding in terms of 20(a) of the border security force act. 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the act for the sake of brevity) was initiated against the petitioner on the basis of complaint made by one sri navin chandra, head clerk ..... had taken place. it has further been submitted that vide letter dated 22.08.2005, a proceeding under rule 63 (4) (6) of the border security force rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the rule for the sake of brevity) was initiated, which culminated in passing of impugned order of dismissal dated ..... nagar, haryana-135003. ... petitioners versus 1.union of india. 2.the director general, border security force, c.g.o complex, lodi road, new delhi. 3.the deputy inspector general, boarder security force, meru, hazaribagh. 4.the commandant, s.t.s wing, p.c. & s boarder boarder security force, meru, hazaribagh. . . respondents ------ coram: hon ble mr. justice pramath patnaik ------ .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Nov-20-2017
..... tc&s bsf, hazaribagh, jharkhand (annexure 1), consequent upon the summary security force court convicted the petitioner for the offence under section 40 of the border security force act, 1968 for an act prejudicial to good order and discipline of the force and sentenced him to be dismissed from service. the petitioner has been struck ..... - bhojpur (bihar) ... petitioner versus 1. the union of india 2. ministry of home affairs, inspector general, border security force, block no. 10, lodi road, new delhi 3. the commandant, special training school, training centre & school, border security force, hazaribagh 4. d.i.g.-cum- commandant, b.s.f., meru, hazaribagh ...... respondents for the petitioner : ..... submitted that this writ application has been filed suppressing material fact that the petitioner has submitted statutory petition against his conviction by summary security force court and the same was duly considered and rejected by the director general of bsf vide his dated 31st july, 2008 and the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-29-2017
..... court, an order dated 23.03.2012 was passed by the respondents terminating his services by passing a dismissal under section 10 of border security force act, 1968, read with rule 23 (a) of the border security force rules, 1969. after being acquitted, the w.p.(c) 463/2017 page 2 of 6 petitioner submitted a representation dated 02.05 ..... filed the present petition aggrieved by the order dated 22.01.2016, informing him that his case for promotion to the rank of deputy commandant in the border security force(hereinafter referred to as bsf) by way of relaxation in qualifying mandatory command and logistic course had been examined by the competent authority and was rejected. ..... and one chamanlal under section 21, 25, 61 & 85 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances (ndps) act and under section 489 (c) of ipc, for their alleged involvement in smuggling of four kg of narcotics from the border outpost at jammu & kashmir. after conclusion of trial, vide judgment dated 05.11.2011 the learned .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Oct-16-2017
..... hon'ble mr. justice navin chawla sanjiv khanna, j.(oral) the petitioner is ex-head constable who was charge sheeted under the border security force act for deserting service between 14.12.2006 and 03.09.2008 and for doing an act with intent to cause wrongful gain for self.2. the petitioner vide order dated 28.12.2008, which has not been placed on ..... record, after trial in the summary security force code, was wp(c) 9005/2015 page 1 dismissed from service.3. the petitioner filed an appeal ..... duration of 628 days was with the ulterior motive to avoid trial on the serious offence of smuggling and an in-disciplined person was unfit to be retained in a force like bsf.4. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was held to be guilty for the second charge i.e. for doing a thing with the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-20-2017
..... be deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case. facts:-"2. the petitioner was enrolled in the border security force on february 15, 1991. after completing the training, he joined his unit on january 31, 1993. for certain acts, the petitioner was proceeded by ssfc on charges under section 20(b), 20(c), 19(f) and 26 ..... of the bsf act, which resulted in the punishment of dismissal from service. the statutory petition filed by the petitioner with the directorate general, border security force was also rejected vide the order dated february 28, 2005. it is noted from the record that the ..... impugned ssfc trail proceedings by which the petitioner has been sentenced to dismissal from service vide annexure p-5 (colly) as well as ministry of home affairs, directorate general border security force letter dated feb 2005, upholding the said findings and sentence. w.p. (c) 4810/2015 page 1 of 28 (ii) issue a writ in the nature .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-19-2017
..... p. 481/2017 niit technologies limited date of decision:19. h december, 2017 .....petitioner through: mr.vikas dutta & mr.siddharth chander joshi, advs. versus directorate general, border security force ..... respondent through: mr.praveen kumar jain, adv. alongwith mrb.s. rautela, ac of respondent coram: hon'ble mr. justice navin chawla navin chawla, j.(oral) 1. ..... relating to any matter arising out of or connected with the contract, such dispute or difference shall be settled in accordance with the indian arbitration and conciliation act, 1996. clause 20(xx) - arbitration proceedings shall be held at new delhi, india and the language of the arbitration proceedings and that of all ..... contention of the respondent to the effect that the respondent having already appointed an arbitrator, this court will cease to have jurisdiction under section 11 of the act to appoint an arbitrator, is hereby rejected.10. as far as the second contention of the respondent, relying upon the clause 24(iii) of the .....
Tag this Judgment!