Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1988Raj205; 1988(1)WLN730
..... this reference briefly stated are: that the border security force, jodhpur (for short the b. s. f.') required some land at jodhpur for the establishment of ..... one by the claimant smt. kamala devi and other filed by the border security force, jodhpur arise out of the judgment of the learned civil judge, jodhpur dated 24-4-1974 in a reference made to him under section 18 of the rajasthan land acquisition act ('the act' herein). 2. the facts necessary to be noticed for the disposal of ..... its unit and staff training college. the government of rajasthan issued a notification under section 4 of the act on 9-9-1970 and ultimately a notice was served .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1998(2)WLC165; 1998(1)WLN207
..... sub-inspector and sub-inspector in the state unit, with all consequential benefits.accordingly, the union of india and the i.g. border security force, new delhi, is directed to fix the petitioner in the service of border security force, strictly in accordance with the provisions of rule 8 by fixing the seniority in the rank of head constable from the date on ..... contempt of court or not is a serious one. the court is both the accuser as well as the judge of the accusation. it behaves the court to act with as great circumspection as possible making all allowances for errors of judgment and difficulties arising from inveterate practices in courts and tribunals. it is only when a clear ..... of contempt and held that in such a case neither the plea of mala fide nor of wilful disobedience can be entertained as the authority has acted bonafide in compliance of the law in force. it is, also, settled law that if the order is capable of being interpreted in two different ways, the court should not resort .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1995(2)WLC288; 1995(1)WLN351
..... lieutenant on 30.6.1963. the petitioner was promoted as captain in the year 1965 and acting major in the year 1966. the petitioner was released from the army service on 16.9.1967 and was absorbed in the border security force where he was already working on deputation for some time as assistant commandant.3. respondents no. ..... as deputy commandant. this too is an admitted fact as recorded in the dpc proceedings that only such officers were appointed and absorbed as assistant commandant in the border security force, who had a high average record in the army and who did well during the interview. there were no interviews held for the post of deputy commandants. ..... that the record of the petitioner even in the army was a high average record otherwise he would not have been absorbed as assistant commandant in the border security force. there is nothing to indicate in the proceedings the basis for supersession of the petitioner respondent no. 1. reference may usefully be made to the observations .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1978WLN(UC)339
..... arises that the appellants formed any common intention with the two rifle men and that the two rifle men acted in furtherance of that common intention. the learned public prosecutor submitted hat it was difficult for the border security force personnel to observe as to and in what manner the appellants were helping, but the evidence of the witnesses ..... pw 12 ramu ram and pw 14 gopalsingh were examined as eye witnesses, pw 5 thakur ram, was examined as a witness who saw the track coming from towards pak border pw 9 kampsingh, & pw 10 shaktidan, were examined as 'motbirs' witnesses; where as pw. 1 laxmansingh, pw 2 devidan, pw 3 yukti karan, pw 7 ..... head constable jangbahadur along with his party proceeded for patrolling. at about 6, p.m, they observed the foot prints of four camels having entered into indian border from towards pakistan border on pillar no. 783. the foot prints were followed by the party. constable thakurram was sent to the out-post sundra to give information regarding the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1995CriLJ3341
..... against petitioner shahmir and koja khan in the court of the special judicial magistrate (economic offences), rajasthan, jaipur. the accused-petitioner was found involved in the recovery made by the border security force of 52.390 kgs. of silver on 28-3-90 as well as 10.469 kgs. of silver recovered by the b. s. f. on 20-3-91.2. the ..... fatal. in smt. rekhaben virendra kapadia v. the state of gujarat, : 1979crilj212 , the detenu was detained under order dated 22-7-74 under section 3 of the maintenance of internal security act. the order was cancelled on 9-12-74 and he was released. he was again detained on 4-7-77 in pursuance to the order dated 7-2-77 passed ..... was passed by the district magistrate, 24 paragana, on 29-12-73, which was made under sub-section (1) read with sub-section (2) of section 3 of the internal security act. the order of detention was challenged on the ground of delay in passing the order. while repelling this contention, it was held by the supreme court that 'the test of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 2007CriLJ226
..... : air1996sc569 . in this case the accused was found to be in conscious possession of a map prepared by border security force. the apex court considering the question of presumption under section 3(2) of the act held as under:.the evidence discloses that the house from which the map was found belongs to the appellant. the ..... the evidence discussed above, it must be held that the prosecution witnesses have proved beyond doubt the recovery of documents containing secret informations concerning safety and security of the nation and that the accused has not been able to offer any explanation, much less reasonable explanation as to why and for what purposes ..... appellant could not have been convicted for offence under section 3 of the official secrets act.11. i have considered the above argument. it is evident from the evidence of prosecution witnesses that documents concerning safety and security of the nation were recovered from the conscious possession of accused appellant, which is further .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : RLW2007(1)Raj43
..... : air1996sc569 . in this case the accused was found to be in conscious possession of a map prepared by border security force. the apex court considering the question of presumption under section 3(2) of the act held as under:.the evidence discloses that the house from which the map was found belongs to the appellant. the ..... the evidence discussed above, it must be held that the prosecution witnesses have proved beyond doubt the recovery of documents containing secret informations concerning safety and security of the nation and 'that the accused has not been able to offer any explanation, much less reasonable explanation as to why and for what purposes ..... appellant could not have been convicted for offence under section 3 of the official secrets act.11. i have considered the above argument. it is evident from the evidence for prosecution witnesses that documents concerning safety and security of the nation were recovered from the conscious possession of accused appellant, which is further .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1976CriLJ821; 1975()WLN585
..... the relevant time.having accomplished his object, hussain khan ran away from the place with the gun. pw/8 baldeosingh, then, left for bandli post of border security force and informed haw-aldar shailabsingh of the occurrence. hawal-dar shailabsingh reduced to writing the information given by baldeosingh who also put his signatures below it. ..... . but, in our opinion, it was not obligatory on the part of the prosecution to produce them. bhawanishanker and shailabsingh were both employees of the border security force and according to the powers conferred upon the b.s.f.. they were not competent to investigate the present case, nor the reports made by baldeosingh ..... has been observed that omissions of important facts in f. i. r. affecting the probabilities of the case, are relevant under section 11 of the evidence act in judging the veracity of the prosecution case. in our opinion, these observations do not apply to the information given by baldeosingh to hawaldar shailabsingh or subtviar .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 2002(5)WLC267; 2002(4)WLN523
..... under section 82 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act of 1956') lor cancellation of the order dated 29.10.1071 (annex. 3) passed by the assistant settlement officer, jaisalmer.the collector, jaisalmer allotted 100 acres of land to the border security force through order dated 26.1.1969 (annex ..... . 5) and the possession of that land was handed over to the border security force on ..... confers on every high court, a special power and responsibility over all subordinate courts and tribunals within its territorial jurisdiction, with the object of securing that all such institutions exercise their powers and discharge their duties properly and in accordance with law.7. the powers of superintendence under article 227 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1967Raj257
..... , etc., which he took to delhi. according to the evidence of e.n.v. naiyar, deputy superintendent of police headquarters. rajasthan armed constabulary was a part of the main force for border security. the learned deputy government advocate drew my attention to section 3, sub-section (2) which lays down that on a prosecution for an offence punishable under this section with imprisonment ..... is evidence of continued association and collaboration between the 4 applicants before me in their activities. besides this, the presumption engrafted in sub-section (2) of section 3 of the act fortifies the prima facie case being under section 3 punishable with 14 years' rigorous imprisonment, which is non-bailable. 5. on the question of the construction of the word 'enemy .....
Tag this Judgment!