Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 5 control direction etc Court: rajasthan Page 93 of about 922 results (0.158 seconds)

Madan Lal and Others Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2012CrLJ1430

..... and fearlessly before the court, following steps shall be taken: (a) ensuring safe passage for the witnesses to and from the court precincts, (b) providing security to the witnesses in their place of residence wherever considered necessary, and (c) relocation of the witnesses to another state wherever such a step is necessary. 45 ..... and secondly, more particularly, hamper the proper administration of justice. these principles are not only applicable to administrative or executive actions, but they apply with equal force and, in fact, with a greater degree of precision to judicial pronouncements. a judgment without reasons causes prejudice to the person against whom it is pronounced, ..... the entire edifice of the case depends on the recording of the evidence. considering the importance of the recording of evidence both the criminal procedure code and the evidence act deal with this aspect of the trial. section 273 cr. p. c. is as under: evidence to be taken in presence of accusedexcept as .....

Smt.Saroj and ors Vs. Prabhu NaraIn and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... , it was not a decree outright; it was a conditional decree. rather, the latter part of the decree was a direction in terrorem so as to secure compliance by the appellant of the money part of the decree in the scheduled time frame. in the event of the appellant having made the payment within a ..... 9 scc606the hon ble supreme court while considering the scope of rule 33 of order xli observed and held as under: 14. the learned counsel for the respondent forcefully argued that even in the absence of appeal preferred by the plaintiff or cross objection taken by the plaintiff- respondent the appellate court was not powerless to grant ..... following issues arise for determination in the present appeal:- (a). preliminary issues: (i) whether the suit filed by the appellants is barred under the benami transactions (prohibition) act, 1988?. (ii) whether the trial court was justified in rejecting the application filed by the appellants under order vi, rule 17 cpc?. 17 (iii) whether the judgment .....