Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 5 control direction etc Court: rajasthan Page 2 of about 922 results (0.071 seconds)

Dr. Sushil Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... was passed against him on 21.2.2012. against this order, a pre-confirmation appeal was filed by the present petitioner as per section 117(1) of the border security force act, 1968. while the said appeal was still pending, the said authority, namely, the director general, hq, bsf, new delhi passed a revisional order on 28. ..... in adverse order on 7.3.2014 after filing of the writ petition, this court is of the opinion that till the highest authority of the respondent border security force, namely, director general, hq, bsf, new delhi passes an appropriate speaking order in the matter after giving a proper and reasonable opportunity of hearing to the ..... -- reportable by the court:1. the present writ petition was filed by the petitioner, dr. sushil kumar, the chief medical officer, ii grade serving the respondent border security force with the following prayers in this court on 25.2.2014: it is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed with costs and by .....

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Devi Lal Sahu

Court : Rajasthan

..... leave and over staying on leave. the writ-petitioner submitted that on 28.10.2003, he was served with a charge-sheet under section 26 of the border security force act, 1968 ('the bsf act') and was placed under close arrest at headquarter 20 bn. barmer on 29.10.2003; and that the assistant commandant proceeded with the record of evidence ..... trial was held in a casual manner where the presiding officer, of his own, held that he had pleaded guilty and that rule 142(2) of the border security forces rules, 1969 ('the bsf rules') was complied with and proceeded to convict and sentence him with dismissal from service; and the said order dated 10.11.2003 ..... background aspects of the matter could be taken in comprehension thus: the respondent herein filed the writ petition aforesaid with the averments, inter alia, that he joined the border security force ('bsf') on 05.09.1986; that he had been serving with sincerity and dedication and had received certain rewards too; and that he had, of course, been .....

Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs V ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [2008(116)FLR914]; RLW2008(2)Raj1605

..... 27.8.1974 and was later on posted as constable nursing assistant during the year 1984.4. he was charged under section 40 of the border security force act vide charge sheet dated 14.12.1994 and after he was tried by summery security force court, he was found guilty and penalty of dismissal from service was imposed.5. section 48 of the b.s.f ..... . act provides punishment which may be inflicted in respect of offence committed by the persons subject to b.s.f. act and convicted by security force court. the various punishments which can be imposed including dismissal from service as well as forfeiture of service for .....

Ex. Havildar Gulta Kailash Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2009(3)WLN94

..... authority to all the pleas raised and the reasons for the decision are also to be explicit in the order itself.11. the relevant provisions of the border security force act are para-materia to the provisions under consideration in instant petition for writ.12. in hans raj's case (supra), a division bench of hon'ble ..... of delhi high court in lt. col. n.k. ghai's case (supra), while examining an issue regarding prescribing reasons, while considering a statutory petition under border security force act, held as follows:as we gather from the communication issued, the appellate authority rejected the appeal on the ground that it is devoid of merit. if the disposal ..... one. it is asserted that a substantive right i.e. of presenting a petition to the competent authority is available to any person subjected to army act, who considers himself aggrieved by a finding or sentence of any court martial which has been confirmed and such post confirmation statutory petition deserves consideration by the .....

Narendra Bahadur Yadav Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... shah submitted that the said period of suspension under the order of the high court has also to be added to the period of sentence under section 133 of the border security force act, 1968, which reads as under: 133. computation of period of suspension :- any period during which the sentence is under suspension shall be reckoned as part of the ..... mandatory provisions of relevant rules for holding such court martial and also such charges are levelled on account of certain complaint made by the petitioner for some unnatural acts by one ct.sunil kumar and against whom a regular court martial was held against the said constable sunil kumar and he was punished by the competent authority ..... order dt:14. 5/2014 5/7 suspension of sentence under the orders of this court cannot be added to the period of sentence as per section 134 of the act which also reads as under: 134. order after suspension :- the authority or officer specified in section 130 may, at any time while a sentence is suspended, order - .....

Ramsingh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1978WLN(UC)90

..... about 21.11.72. it was further alleged that in the night between 1.11.73 and 2.11.73 an ambush was laid by the personnel of the border security force at the border near pillar no. 916 and 917. the party consisted of prem singh pw. 2, sukha ram pw. 3 and others at about 6.30. am prem singh pw. 2 ..... petitioner is entitled to the benefit of doubt.6. in the result, the revision petition is allowed. the convictions and sentences of the petitioner under section 14 of they foreigners, act 1946 and rule 31 read with rule 6 of the passport (entry into india) rules 19.0 are set aside. he is acquitted of the above offences. he is in ..... r.l. gupta, j.1. the petitioner ram singh has preferred this revision through jail. he was convicted by the chief judicial magistrate, barmer under section 14 of the foreigners act, 1946 and under rule 3 read with rule 6 of the passport (entry into india) rules, 1950 he has been sentenced or the first count to undergo rigorous imprisonment for .....

Roshan Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1993CriLJ2688

..... reports of the military intelligence, barmer, dated 5-5-92 and 1-10-92, and the reports dated 1-10-92, 11-10-92 and 14-1-92 of the border security force, barmer, the petitioner was found engaged in the espionage activities and supplying important strategical informations to the pakistan secret intelligence agencies and is working as an agent of f.u ..... disclose the material facts, which according to him, is not in the public interest. the court further opined that this can be done under section 8(2) of the national security act, also. the court, after considering both the provisions, i.e., article 22(6) of the constitution of india and section 8(2) of the ..... (5) of the constitution of india is required to be considered by the district magistrate ordering for the detention of the petitioner-detenu under section 3(3) of the national security act, came-up for consideration before the hon'ble supreme court in the case of : raj kishore prasad v. state of bihar, air 1983 sc 320 : (1983 cri lj 629). .....

Border Security Force and anr. Vs. the Land Acquisition Officer and or ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1997(1)WLC518; 1996(1)WLN466

..... 1622 and 1625 situated on mandore road, jodhpur was acquired by the state government for the purpose of border security force. notification under section 4 of the land acquisition act (for short, 'the act') that the land is needed for border security force, was issued and published in the gazette on 22-1-68. the declaration under section 6 of ..... which were treated as the applications under section 18 of the act. the learned civil judge, by his award dated 31-5-79, allowed the ..... by the land acquisition officer, filed an application under section 18 of the act for making a reference to the civil court and the matter was referred to the civil judge for determination of the adequate amount of compensation. the border security force and the state, also, filed cross objections before the learned civil judge, .....

Kali Das Vs. Union of India

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1991(1)WLN577

..... the petition under section 117 of the act no reasons have been given. the b.s.f. is an armed force of the union of india constituted under item 2 of list i of schedule 7 of the constitution and is primarily connected with the defence of the country for ensuring the security of the border of india as in the cases arising ..... out of the special enactment like army act, all the principles of natural ..... used in evidence.' after having been cautioned in the aforesaid manner, whatever the accused stages shall be taken down in writing. the b.s.f. act, is a self contained code and general security force court has a special jurisdction and with a view to prevent miscarriage of justice and fair play in the trial this special procedure has been provided. .....

Loon Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2009(4)Raj3567

..... case, it is clearly revealed that the petitioners were not appointed under any service rules; and, so also, they were engaged as volunteers and deployed with the border security force and they are not required to work regularly and their voluntary service can be utilized after empaneling as and when their voluntary service is required. therefore, the petitioners ..... of issuing any direction to the respondents for granting the benefit of regularization or absorption who are admittedly appointed as volunteers by the government under the rajasthan home guards act, 1963 and rajasthan home guards rules, 1962.29. in this case, the writ petition has been filed by 658 persons. of course some persons are working ..... are dismissed. there shall be no order as to costs.14. before parting with this case, we would like to observe that the home guards act in [several states appears to be misused. hence, the central government may consider not releasing funds for the home guards in a state where the provisions of .....