Bombay Prohibition Act 1949 Maharashtra Section 134 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: bombay prohibition act 1949 maharashtra section 134 Year: 2024 Page 1 of about 315 results (2.172 seconds)State Of U.p. . Vs. M/s. Lalta Prasad Vaish And Sons
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-23-2024
devans modern brewaries 2004 11 scc26 state of bombay v bombay education society 1954 2 scc15297 1942 4 fcr17page 53 of and hold that the definition of liquor in the bombay prohibition act is not ultra vires emphasis supplied page 75 of in relation to intoxicants therefore the states right to regulate activities in relation to intoxicants to the extent of prohibiting would bom 57 128 bombay prohibition act 129 bombay prohibition act 1949 section 2 22 130 bombay prohibition act 1949 section 2 it is held that issuance of a notified order under section 18g of the idra is neither a sine qua non the meaning assigned to it in various enactments including the 134 18th amendment to the us constitution section 1 after one
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSant Bhagwan Baba Shikshan Mandal Vs. Gunwant
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-03-2024
november 2009 passed by the high court of judicature at bombay aurangabad bench whereunder a writ petition filed by the respondent appointing a person duly qualified to fill such vacancy the order of appointment shall be drawn up in the form prescribed 1977 by including the post of shikshan sevak under the act and casting an obligation on the management of private schools dated 15th february 2007 after updating the original gr the maharashtra employees of private schools conditions of service regulation act 1977 of three years 2a subject to the provisions of sub sections 3 and 4 shikshan sevak shall on completion of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnanya Anantharaman Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Apr-22-2024
..... inapplicable to trials for offences under the bombay prohibition act section 510 is a general provision dealing with proof ..... bharati vidyapeeth bharati vidyapeeth v state of maharashtra 2004 11 scc755 2 scec535 that entire gamut ..... parcq in cutler v wandsworth stadium ltd 1949 c 398 410 had ridiculed an enactment ..... ammagaripet jinkalavaripalli post srinivasapura taluk kolar 563 134 date of admission 24 07 2015 cet .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMr. Dr. G Sai Abilash Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Apr-22-2024
..... inapplicable to trials for offences under the bombay prohibition act section 510 is a general provision dealing with proof ..... bharati vidyapeeth bharati vidyapeeth v state of maharashtra 2004 11 scc755 2 scec535 that entire gamut ..... parcq in cutler v wandsworth stadium ltd 1949 c 398 410 had ridiculed an enactment ..... ammagaripet jinkalavaripalli post srinivasapura taluk kolar 563 134 date of admission 24 07 2015 cet .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr Sharanya Mohan Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Apr-22-2024
..... inapplicable to trials for offences under the bombay prohibition act section 510 is a general provision dealing with proof ..... bharati vidyapeeth bharati vidyapeeth v state of maharashtra 2004 11 scc755 2 scec535 that entire gamut ..... parcq in cutler v wandsworth stadium ltd 1949 c 398 410 had ridiculed an enactment ..... ammagaripet jinkalavaripalli post srinivasapura taluk kolar 563 134 date of admission 24 07 2015 cet .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMr Tanay Appachu Shastry Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Apr-22-2024
..... inapplicable to trials for offences under the bombay prohibition act section 510 is a general provision dealing with proof ..... bharati vidyapeeth bharati vidyapeeth v state of maharashtra 2004 11 scc755 2 scec535 that entire gamut ..... parcq in cutler v wandsworth stadium ltd 1949 c 398 410 had ridiculed an enactment ..... ammagaripet jinkalavaripalli post srinivasapura taluk kolar 563 134 date of admission 24 07 2015 cet .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr Shivani Ramachandran Vs. Union Of India
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Apr-22-2024
..... inapplicable to trials for offences under the bombay prohibition act section 510 is a general provision dealing with proof ..... bharati vidyapeeth bharati vidyapeeth v state of maharashtra 2004 11 scc755 2 scec535 that entire gamut ..... parcq in cutler v wandsworth stadium ltd 1949 c 398 410 had ridiculed an enactment ..... ammagaripet jinkalavaripalli post srinivasapura taluk kolar 563 134 date of admission 24 07 2015 cet .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMr.kushal B.r. Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Apr-22-2024
..... inapplicable to trials for offences under the bombay prohibition act section 510 is a general provision dealing with proof ..... bharati vidyapeeth bharati vidyapeeth v state of maharashtra 2004 11 scc755 2 scec535 that entire gamut ..... parcq in cutler v wandsworth stadium ltd 1949 c 398 410 had ridiculed an enactment ..... ammagaripet jinkalavaripalli post srinivasapura taluk kolar 563 134 date of admission 24 07 2015 cet .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Sharanya Mohan Vs. Union Of India Ministry Of Health And Family We ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Apr-22-2024
..... inapplicable to trials for offences under the bombay prohibition act section 510 is a general provision dealing with proof ..... bharati vidyapeeth bharati vidyapeeth v state of maharashtra 2004 11 scc755 2 scec535 that entire gamut ..... parcq in cutler v wandsworth stadium ltd 1949 c 398 410 had ridiculed an enactment ..... ammagaripet jinkalavaripalli post srinivasapura taluk kolar 563 134 date of admission 24 07 2015 cet .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr Niharika H S Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Apr-22-2024
..... inapplicable to trials for offences under the bombay prohibition act section 510 is a general provision dealing with proof ..... bharati vidyapeeth bharati vidyapeeth v state of maharashtra 2004 11 scc755 2 scec535 that entire gamut ..... parcq in cutler v wandsworth stadium ltd 1949 c 398 410 had ridiculed an enactment ..... ammagaripet jinkalavaripalli post srinivasapura taluk kolar 563 134 date of admission 24 07 2015 cet .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT