Bombay Prohibition Act 1949 Maharashtra Section 134 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: bombay prohibition act 1949 maharashtra section 134 Year: 1991 Page 1 of about 333 results (0.764 seconds)Maharashtra Wine Merchants Association and Others Etc. Vs. the State o ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : May-21-1991
Reported in : AIR1992Bom3; 1992(2)BomCR523; 1991(2)MhLj1258
for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of the bombay prohibition act 1949 and in particular also with reference to in these writ petitions a section 143 of the bombay prohibition act 1949 empowers the state government to frame rules for the act operate in different fields s 142 of the act provides that if the collector is of the opinion that facts and some of the provisions of bombay prohibition act 1949 and the relevant rules in order to appreciate the nature on 17th may 1991 the home secretary of government of maharashtra issued a wireless message to all collectors and all the the nature of controversy arising in these writ petitions a section 143 of the bombay prohibition act 1949 empowers the state
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamesh G. Bhatia Vs. J.M. Malik, Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistr ...
Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-16-1991
Reported in : [1994]79CompCas44(Delhi)
under sections 85 1 and 66 1 b of the bombay prohibition act 1949 the trial magistrate came to the conclusion sections 85 1 and 66 1 b of the bombay prohibition act 1949 the trial magistrate came to the conclusion that 85 1 and 66 1 b of the bombay prohibition act 1949 the trial magistrate came to the conclusion that the 1 and 66 1 b of the bombay prohibition act 1949 the trial magistrate came to the conclusion that the accused himself he was however not convicted of the offence under section 66 1 b since the prosecution was not able to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of U.P. and anr. Vs. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. and anr.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jul-18-1991
Reported in : 1993(41)ECC326; JT1991(3)SC268; 1991(2)SCALE110; (1991)4SCC139; [1991]3SCR64; [1992]87STC289(SC); 1991(2)LC396(SC)
the govern ment of maharashtra charged transport fee under the bombay rectified spirit transport in bond rules 1951 made under the scc 109 including the transport fee levied under the bombay prohibition act 1949 and the vend fee levied by the state liquors containing alcohol section 2 24 of the bombay prohibition act 1949 was held to be intra vires however so far including the transport fee levied under the bombay prohibition act 1949 and the vend fee levied by the state of uttar as amended in 1972 and 1976 the govern ment of maharashtra charged transport fee under the bombay rectified spirit transport in diesel oil and alcohol taxation amendment act 1976 amended sub section 1 of section 3 of the united provinces sales of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSharadchandra Vinayak Dongre, and Others Etc. Vs. V. State of Maharash ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-11-1991
Reported in : 1991CriLJ3329
anticipatory bail was made before the city sessions court at bombay on his behalf and vide order dated 4th december 1985 this juncture to state that s 108 of the bombay prohibition act inter alia provides for punishment by imprisonment for a is not a requirement und4r section 3 of the atrocities act that the complainant should disclose the caste of the accused 82 1 83 and 108 of the bombay prohibition act 1949 the respondent state alleged that the applicants in criminal application the year 1972 for the manufacture of bear under the maharashtra manufacture of bear and wine rules 1966 framed under the completion of investigation is not police report within meaning of section 173 2 read with section 2 r magistrate cannot take
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNilesh Alias Narayan Y. Jadhav Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-07-1991
Reported in : AIR1992Bom225; 1991(1)MhLj770
exhausting the statutory remedy provided under section 137 of the bombay prohibition act 1949 act 4 to take up the last the statutory remedy provided under section 137 of the bombay prohibition act 1949 act 4 to take up the last point the impugned order gives the impression of the 2nd respondent acting in consonance with the policy formulated by the state government remedy provided under section 137 of the bombay prohibition act 1949 act 4 to take up the last point first section of the so called policy was rule 28 of the maharashtra country liquor rules 1973 and a term of the licence to this court without exhausting the statutory remedy provided under section 137 of the bombay prohibition act 1949 act 4 to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTamil Nadu State Marketing Corpn. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras
Decided on : Dec-31-1991
Reported in : (1992)42ITD349(Mad.)
1951 sc 318 in which the constitutional validity of the bombay prohibition act 1949 was challenged the validity of the act particular attention to the provisions of section 18a of the prohibition act which stipulates that excise duty or countervailing duty may fee and the addl vend fee collected under the prohibition act is tax properly so called or whether it is fee in which the constitutional validity of the bombay prohibition act 1949 was challenged the validity of the act was sought to other privilege of manufacturing selling by retail imfl etc under section 17c and also a fee on licences granted under the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Maharashtra Vs. Narayan Sitaram Chavan
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-14-1991
Reported in : 1991(3)BomCR567
that the charge under section 66 1 b of the bombay prohibition act had not been proved the sample of blood to an offence under section 85 1 of the bombay prohibition act but indeed whether the accused was found in a phadtare p w 2 speaks nothing about such behaviour and acts of accused hanmanta also stated that it was there after sections 66 1 and 85 1 of bombay prohibition act 1949 and section 3 of evidence act 1872 appeal by state that neither the offence under section 66 1 b nor section 85 1 of the bombay prohibition act was proved against
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMani Nariman Daruwala Alias Bharucha (Deceased) Through Lrs. and ors. ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-30-1991
Reported in : AIR1991SC1494a; JT1991(5)SC357; 1991(1)SCALE885; (1991)3SCC141; 1991(2)LC277(SC)
5 1990 passed by the high court of judicature at bombay in writ petition no 1491 of 1984 tiled under article of the premises in his occupation and sought a permanent injunction restraining the defendants respondents nos 1 to 4 from disturbing to claim protection of section 15a of the bombay rent act 7 dr y s chitale the learned counsel appearing for section 5 which was introduced in bombay rent act by maharashtra act no xvii of 1973 defines the expression licencee the acquired a right to become a deemed tenant protected under section 15a of the bombay rent act in that view of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAyurvidya Prasarak Mandal and anr. Vs. Geeta Bhaskar Pendse (Mrs) and ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-12-1991
Reported in : [1991(62)FLR771]; JT1991(2)SC209; 1991(1)SCALE706; (1991)3SCC246; [1991]2SCR282; 1992(1)SLJ26(SC); 1991(2)LC452(SC)
conferred upon him under section 11 6 b of the bombay university act 1974 hereinafter referred to as the act and take steps within two weeks from the receipt of this order to start the process of advertisement as directed above the high court held that notwithstanding the break in her actual appointment she was continuously in employment from march 19 1984 into force with retrospective effect from the date of the maharashtra government resolution that is of 29 9 1986 which means of the powers conferred on it under subsection 2 of section 77 c of the act issuing instructions to all the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSpences Hotel Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-15-1991
Reported in : (1991)93CTR(SC)60
city ahmedabad ors supra the question was whether under the bombay provincial municipal corporation act 49 of 1949 levy of property effects alike all persons similarly situated it however does not prohibit special legislation or legislation that is limited either in the namely the owners of air conditioned hotels and restaurants the act requires the luxury tax to be in proportion of or whether under the bombay provincial municipal corporation act 49 of 1949 levy of property tax on textile factories at flat rate of factories on any rational basis 18 in state of maharashtra ors vs madhukar balkrishna badiya ors air1988sc2062 the validity of and was inherent in the very provisions of the taxing section and that there was no attempted classification and nothing more
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT