Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bombay police act 1951 maharashtra section 8 appointment of superintendent additional assistant and deputy superintendents Page 1 of about 142 results (0.546 seconds)

Feb 05 2009 (HC)

Anami Narayan Roy, Indian Inhabitant and ors. Vs. Suprakash Chakravart ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR221; 2009(111)BomLR869

..... that the judgment squarely covers the field of appointment to the post of director general of police. however, it is necessary to consider the relevant police rules including bombay police act, 1951, the indian police service (recruitment) rules, 1954, bombay police manual, 1959 and other related laws. like every order and action of the state ..... scase (supra) was not workable presently, in that event the state should have acted in accordance with the relevant provisions of indian police service (appointment by promotion) regulations, 1955, bombay police manual, 1959 and the bombay police act, 1951. furthermore, even if the statutory provisions in regard to the method of appointment ..... laws which may have direct or otherwise bearing on the matter in issue are the indian police services (recruitment) rules, 1954, the indian police services (cadre) rules, 1954, the bombay police act, 1951, the bombay police manual, 1959 and the allied statutes which have a bearing on various aspects of the other .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 24 2022 (SC)

Zakir Abdul Mirajkar Vs. The State Of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the air of the argument which was founded on para 25 of the police manual. the police manual purports to contain rules under the bombay police act 1951, the bombay police (extension and amendment) act 1959 and other departmental regulations. para 25 of the police manual provides that: 25. superintendent of police: (1) subject to the orders of the district magistrate and the ..... strictly. an addl. sp is not of the same rank as an sp because: i. section 8 of the bombay police act 1951 provides that the state government may empower an additional superintendent to 8 evidence act 10 part c exercise and perform all or any of the powers, functions or duties to be exercised or performed by ..... 427 of the indian penal code 1860,1 sections 4 and 5 of the maharashtra prevention of gambling act 1887,2 section 65(e) of the maharashtra prohibition act 1949 and sections 37 and 135 of the bombay police act 1951 was registered in ps rajarampuri, kolhapur on the basis of a complaint made by one of the members .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 19 1978 (HC)

Ramrajsing Sadanandsing Chandele Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1979)81BOMLR602

..... be read along with the bombay police act, 1951, to understand the nature of the departmental inquiry to be held in the state reserve police force, inasmuch as the inspector general of police is the head of even the bombay state reserve police force, and section 3 of the bombay state reserve police force act, 1951 declares that in addition to the police force constituted under the bombay police act, 1951, the state government may establish and ..... are inconsistent with the provisions of this act, apply to every such reserve police officer.16. in other words, the provisions of the bombay police act, 1951, in so far as they are not inconsistent with the provisions of the bombay state reserve police force act, 1951, will apply to the members of the state reserve police force.17. section 25(2)(a) of the bombay police act, 1951 empowers a superintendent, who is of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 08 1982 (HC)

Tukaram Bhau Mane Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1983)85BOMLR115; 1983MhLJ317

..... he was further warned by the said order that his failure to vacate as directed would expose him to action under sub-section (2) of section 31 of the bombay police act, 1951. the appellant thereupon filed the writ petition on the original side of this high court, out of which the present appeal arises, seeking to quash both the said ..... in which it was stated that 23 policemen mentioned in the said notice had been dismissed from the bombay city police force by the government of maharashtra with effect from august 18, 1982 by an order under section 25(2) of the bombay police act read with clause (c) of the second proviso to article 311(2) of the constitution of ..... , b. no. 18806 bombay city police force, an opportunity of showing cause against, the action proposed to be taken in regard to him, as envisaged in subclause (2) of the said article;and whereas the governer of maharashtra is satisfied that the conduct of shri t.b. mane, as displayed by his various acts of commission and omission is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 1975 (HC)

N.P. Nathwani Vs. the Commissioner of Police

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1976)78BOMLR1

..... after the proclamation of emergency declared by reason of danger to internal security, on june 27, 1975, the commissioner of police, greater bombay by his order issued under section 37(5) of the bombay police act, 1951, (bombay act xxii of 1951) prohibited any assembly of five or more than five persons and any procession of any persons for a period of one ..... contention on behalf of the petitioners is that the impugned orders, which are made in exercise of delegated powers conferred by section 37(3) of the bombay police act, 1951 and rule 69 of the defence and internal security of india rules, 1971, are ultra vires the provisions of the said section and the rule under which ..... , 1975. on october 9, 1975 the government of maharashtra accorded sanction for ex-lending the period of prohibitory orders issued under section 37(3) of the bombay police act, 1951 for a further period of one month with effect from october 10, 1975. in view of the said order, the order dated october 1, 1975 was continued .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 2019 (SC)

Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) General Secretary Vs. T ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... committee and independent studies on socio-economic situations of women involved in dance bars, section 33a and 33b were added vide bombay police amendment act, 2005 in maharashtra police act, 1951, (erstwhile bombay police act, 1951) which prohibited any kind of dance performance in an eating house, permit room or beer bar. section 33b provided an ..... 127. the activities of the eating houses, permit rooms and beer bars are controlled by the following regulations: (i) the bombay municipal corporation act; (ii) the bombay police act, 1951; (iii) the bombay prohibition act, 1949; (iv) the rules for licensing and controlling places of public entertainment, 1953; (v) the rules for licensing ..... identical nature made by the respondents failed to pass the constitutional muster. the provisions of sections 33a and 33b inserted vide amendment act, 2005 to the bombay police act, 1951 had been struck down as unconstitutional being in contravention of articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the constitution. in spite .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 2013 (HC)

Kishore Baliram Balu Vs. Dy Comr of Police, Zone-i and Others

Court : Mumbai

..... he then proceeds to suggest that it matters not under what section of the bombay police act, 1951 the action is proposed so long as some action is taken. this may seem to mr. agarwal to be a robust way of assessing the appeal before ..... under chapter viii of the code of criminal procedure, 1973. it has nothing whatever to do with section 56 of the bombay police act, 1951. how that concept of [public] peace could inveigle itself into the bombay police act is a mystery that perhaps only mr. agarwal can unravel (the phrase public peace is used verbtaimlater in the appellate order.). ..... . the petitioner was ordered to be externed for one year from nashik city and rural district. 6. these are proceedings supposedly under section 56(1)(b) of the bombay police act, 1951. that, at least, is what the externment order says. it does not reference section 56(1)(a) at all. but, as mr. tripathi, learned advocate for .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 2011 (HC)

Sandipbhai Bhanubhai Meckwan Vs. State of Gujarat and anr

Court : Gujarat

..... of the indian penal code and section 135 of the bombay police act and sentenced to simple imprisonment of five years and two years respectively.10. learned advocate shri pradeep patel for the appellant vehemently submitted that learned trial ..... 9. as noted, sandeep accused no. 1 was convicted for offences punishable under section 307 of the indian penal code and section 135 of the bombay police act and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of seven years and simple imprisonment of two years respectively. budha accused no. 2 was convicted for offences punishable section 325 ..... 104/2004, the appellant original accused no. 1 was convicted for offence punishable under section 307 of the indian penal code and section 135 of the bombay police act and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of seven years and simple imprisonment of two years respectively. fine was also imposed. appellant no. 2 accused no. 2 was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 2011 (HC)

Kirpalsing Jungbahabursing ChhabarA. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

..... , 396, 397, 398, 435, 436, 427, 376, 120b, 186, 188, 153a[a][b] and 153[a-1] part ii of indian penal code read with sec. 135[1] of the bombay police act.2. mr. n.d. nanavaty, learned senior advocate appearing with mr. mausam yagnik, learned advocate for the applicant, submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the alleged commission ..... , 396, 397, 398, 435, 436, 427, 376, 120b, 186, 188, 153a[a][b] and 153[a-1] part ii of indian penal code read with sec. 135[1] of the bombay police act. it is pertinent to note that the first application for bail was preferred by the applicant being criminal misc. application no. 12759 of 2009 and by order dated 27.4 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 13 1991 (HC)

Vishvanath Putu Chipkar and ors. Vs. Mormugao Port Trust by Its Chairm ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1991(4)BomCR39; (1991)93BOMLR220

..... down in the constitution of india (para 11 thereof). the division bench decision must therefore be confined to the facts of that case and limited to bombay port trust in the circumstances of absence of regulation, unlike the case of mormugao port trust which has framed regulations.24. mr. rebello had indeed contended ..... trust had not framed any regulations though required under section 28 read with section 126 of the major port trusts act and what is more, bombay port trust had already framed regulations for class i and class ii posts. in the absence of regulations, the reservation policy of ..... by virtue of section 19 of the goa, daman and diu re-organization act, 1987, the constitution (scheduled castes) order, 1950, the constitution (scheduled castes) union territories) order, 1951, the constitution (scheduled tribues) order, 1950 and the constitution (scheduled tribes) (union territories) order, 1951, stood amended and the constitution (goa, daman and diu) scheduled castes order .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //