Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bombay police act 1951 maharashtra section 8 appointment of superintendent additional assistant and deputy superintendents Page 8 of about 142 results (0.142 seconds)

Ashok @ Aau S/O Pitambar Choudhary and Another Vs. the State of Mahara ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... the judicial pronouncement cited by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner carefully. 13. at the outset, it would be useful to reproduce section 57(1) of the bombay police act 1951 for the reference as follows:- 57. removal of persons convicted of certain offences:- [(1)] if a person has been convicted - (a) (i) of an offence ..... has dropped the said externment proceedings on 7.8.2007 observing that there were no sufficient grounds to extern the petitioner under section 56 (b) of bombay police act. however, according to the petitioner after lapse of about four years and that too on the verge of the elections of municipal council, a show cause ..... special duty in appeal no.235/2011 be quashed and set aside. 3. the petitioner is the aggrieved person against whom action under section 57 of the bombay police act, 1950 has been taken by the respondents, whereas respondent no.1 is the state of maharashtra represented through its principal secretary, home department, mantralaya, mumbai .....

NitIn Janardhan Raut Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2002(6)BomCR43

..... learned counsel are substantiated, we see no reason to postpone the hearing. hence we heard the counsel and now proceed to decide the matter. 8. the bombay police act of 1951 was passed in that year after the commencement of the constitution of india. the government of maharashtra was therefore aware of the provisions of article 311 and ..... dispensed with in cases covered by article 311(2). but even if such enquiry is dispensed with, an opportunity as contemplated by proviso to section 26 of bombay police act will have to be given. admittedly no such opportunity is given in the present case. therefore the order impugned is liable to be set aside as no ..... and dismiss the petition only on the ground of latches. 5. the learned counsel ms. karnik submitted that there is violation of section 26 of the bombay police act and that the explanation contained in the order of discharge for avoiding departmental enquiry is grossly inadequate and incorrect. the departmental enquiry can always be held in .....

Ashok Vs. Pralhad and Another

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1988(1)BomCR219

..... /9845-pol, dt. 2nd of june, 1979 have included (1) all police officers as defined in the bombay police act, 1951 other than the special or additional police officers appointed under s. 21 or 22 of the act, (2) all reserve police officers as defined in bombay state reserve police force act, 1951, whenever they are charged with the maintenance of public order. mr. bobde urged ..... for the petitioner in criminal application no. 160 of 1986. according to him, the petitioners are entitled to the protection not only of s. 159 of the bombay police act, but also under s. 197 of the cr.p.c. it was urged that both the petitioners were in their official uniforms and they were taking their ..... called as a part of the duty which the accused were expected to do. what s. 159 of the bombay police act contemplates is the 'duty' contemplated under s. 159 of the bombay police act which is attached to the 'act done in good faith' and that too in pursuance or intended pursuance of any duty. it would be interesting .....

Anandsagar Bahuddeshiya Social Krida Mandal (Sanstha) Vs. the State of ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... of 1960") for granting licences in view of clauses (w) (w) (wa) (x) and (y) of sub section (1) of section 33 of the bombay police act, 1951. the petitioner submits that, in view of the said rules, procedure has been contemplated for granting various licences and as far as present case is concerned, the petitioner ..... authority. it is submitted that, the petitioner has not submitted audit report. it is further submitted that, there is no statutory provision either in the bombay police act or under the rules for licensing and controlling places of public amusements (other than cinemas) and performances for public amusement, including melas and tamashas 1960 wherein ..... reply filed by the respondent nos. 3 and 4 which reads thus: "3. i say and submit that, there is no statutory provision either in bombay police act or under rules for licensing and controlling places of public amusements (other than cinemas) and performances for public amusement, including melas and tamasha's 1960, wherein .....

Kana Nagu Mhatre Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Police, Panvel Division ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1996(3)BomCR714; (1996)98BOMLR285; 1996CriLJ3144

..... january, 1996 shows that the petitioner is alleged to be committing serious breaches of the terms of the licence granted to him and of the provisions of the bombay police act and the rules made thereunder. unfortunately, in the order of the a.c.p., panvel division, panvel, dated 29th january, 1996, there is no ..... and style of m/s. hotel gopika at panvel in district raigad. the petitioner held licences for running an eating house under the bombay police act, for serving liquor therein under the bombay prohibition act and also for providing 'entertainment' in the eating house. 3. the petitioner was served with show cause notice dated 16th january, 1996 ..... the matter convicted the petitioner. 5. by an order dated 16th january, 1996, the assistant commissioner of police, panvel division, panvel, straightaway came to the conclusion that the petitioner was guilty of breaches of the bombay police act and the rules as alleged against him and made an order cancelling eating house licence no. 14 of .....

Shri K.L. Mansukhani Vs. Senior Inspector of Police and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1999)101BOMLR811

..... in exercise of the powers conferred by clauses (wm) (wa), (x) and (y) of sub-section (1) of section 33 of the bombay police act, 1951. similarly, the gazette has been produced whereby the said rules were amended by the commissioner of police, thane pursuant to the amendment of clause (di). this clause refers to the game in respect of which a licence is required ..... of 1983 by order dated 23rd august, 1983 passed by the division bench of this court. after that the police insisted on taking action under the provisions of the bombay police act, 1951 on the allegation that no licence had been taken under the said act. another petition came to be filed being writ petition no. 1616 of 1988 on the original side of this court .....

Mohamad Siddiki Haji Moha Shafi @ Ansari Vs. State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai

..... against him and give him a reasonable opportunity of tendering an explanation regarding them. therefore, it follows from the provisions of section 59 of the bombay police act, 1951 that while issuing show cause notice and before passing order of externment, it is necessary to inform the concerned person in writing about the general nature ..... pass the order of externment on 22nd march, 2012, externing the petitioner from district thane for the period of one year under section 56(b) of the bombay police act, 1951. 6. being aggrieved by the above-said order, the petitioner filed appeal no.ext.112 of 2012 before the secretary, home department, mantralaya, mumbai. however ..... of the report filed by the respondent no.4 and on 12th january, 2012, issued show cause notice to the petitioner under section 59 of the bombay police act, 1951. the petitioner was directed to remain present on 20th january, 2012 for furnishing his explanation to the show cause notice. the petitioner, in pursuant to .....

iqbal Munnaf Sayyed Vs. Asst. Commissioner of Police, Wanavadi Divisio ...

Court : Mumbai

..... 2 herein was pleased to issue the impugned order of externment under the provisions of bombay police act, 1951 against the petitioner. being aggrieved by the said order of externment, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the appellate authority, which came to be dismissed on 10th ..... its order dated 10th april, 2012 passed in appeal no.ext-2012/14/spl.3-(a). 2. the respondent no.1 herein was pleased to issue notice under bombay police act, 1951 to the petitioner on 13th august, 2012. the petitioner appeared before the respondent no.1 and gave his reply. on 27th september, 2011, the respondent no. ..... 147, 148, 149, 323, 406(1) read with sections 37(1) and 135 of the bombay police act, 1951. the petitioner had no opportunity to put forth his case in respect of c.r. no.90 of 2010 registered with the hadapsar police station. therefore, in our considered opinion, there is a clear breach of principles of natural justice, in .....

Subhan Mohammed Mustafa Sayyed Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

..... to record subjective satisfaction which is a condition precedent either for passing an order in clause (a) or (b) of sub-section (1) of section 56 of the bombay police act, 1951. reference in the show cause notice cannot be read as the subjective satisfaction which is to be recorded after hearing the proposed externee. 4. therefore, the impugned order ..... of section 56 of the bombay police act, 1951 can be passed only after recording a subjective satisfaction that the witnesses were not willing to come forward to give evidence in public for the reasons set out in sub ..... app has pointed out that there is an error while mentioning the section and the order shall be treated as the one passed under section 56(1)(a) of the bombay police act, 1951. the appeal preferred against the said order has been dismissed by the state government. 3. an order under clause (a) or (b) of sub-section (1) .....

The Municipal Corporation for Greater Bombay and anr. Vs. Shroff and C ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1988Bom334; (1987)89BOMLR612

..... of sale. it was further urged by the learned counsel that the liability to pay octroi duty arises under the provisions of section 192 of the bombay municipal corporation act, and while determining the value of the imported article, it is necessary to ascertain the value by taking into consideration the amount which the importer is ..... the law relating to the promotion and enforcement of and carrying into effect the policy of prohibition and also the abkari law in the state of bombay. section 105 of this act, inter alia, provides that an excise duty or countervailing duty, as the case may be, at such rate or rates as the government shall ..... liquor in a bonded warehouse without payment of excise duty or countervailing duty or other fees payable thereon.2. the bombay municipal corporation is constituted under the bombay municipal corporation act and section 192(1) of the act prescribes for levy of octroi tax. the section provides that the tax at rates not exceeding those respectively specified in .....