Bombay Police Act 1951 Maharashtra Section 134 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: bombay police act 1951 maharashtra section 134 Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 891 results (2.821 seconds)Muthoot Finance Limited Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
said gold is stolen it is made clear that the police officer cannot retain the gold in his possession but would 30 12 2024 and quash the same and all consequential actions taken against the petitioner thereafter interest of justice and equity the gold has to be returned if an application under section 454 of the earlier code of criminal procedure and now
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr Mohankumar M Vs. State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
of karnataka represented by the anti corruption bureau bengaluru city police station bengaluru 560001 since a c b is defunct and city civil and sessions judge and special judge p c act bnegaluru cch no 24 and discharge the petitioner for the case of dhariwal19tobacco products limited and others v state of maharashtra and another reported in 2009 2 scc370with regard to the would not constitute a bar for entertaining an application under section 482 of cr p c even where a revision application
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAsset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Regist ...
Court : Karnataka
sridevi and dr senthilnathan to continue to perpetuate illegalities such actions on their part cannot be allowed by this court in floor no 29 senapati bapat marg dadar west mumbai city maharashtra 400028 represented by its authorised signatory mr harish kumar petitioner india limited arcil registered as securitisation and reconstruction company under section 3 of the securitization and reconstruction of financial assets and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrindavan Hydropower Private Limited Vs. Union Of India
Court : Karnataka
the governments would be restricted only to the framing of polices which would guide the appropriate commissions a rule which basically company registered and governed under the provisions of the companies act1956having its registered office at kaveri bhavan k g road bengaluru560009 2023 wp no 23729 of 2023 and 12 other cases maharashtra41610 represented by its authorised signatory petitioners by sri shridhar prabhu the central government is also evident from the text of section 108 the provision reads in the discharge of its functions in which the interests of all the stakeholders are safeguarded 134 the regulator by its very nature is required to be
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri. Chennakeshava Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
judgment reported in 2015 0 supreme mad 209 the complainant police have foisted false case against the petitioner learned counsel would of this court that too when section 3 of the act clearly shows that any activity connected with or arising out charge sheet 21 it is also important to note that section 3 of the land grabbing act is very clear that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMs. X Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
book employment papers 17 identity card related to bar 18 policy papers 24 nc 2024 khc 49110 wp no 55559 of published in gazette of india extraordinary part ii 8 transgender act was promulgated after taking into consideration the lacunae in the barely on account of the person being transgender 15 under section 4 there is a right conferred on the transgender person
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Re ...
Court : Karnataka
in office of the sub registrar peenya and has also acted on the complaint filed by anti corruption council of india floor no 29 senapati bapat marg dadar west mumbai city maharashtra 400028 represented by its authorised signatory mr harish kumar petitioner 13 arcil approached the 7th additional chief metropolitan magistrate under section 14 of the sarfaesi act by filing criminal misc no
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s H M Infra Tech Pvt Ltd Vs. H M Tamborine Apartments Owners Associa ...
Court : Karnataka
12 and 13 wherein it is held that the contract act does not enable a party to a contract to ignore reject the plaint invoking order vii rule 11 read with section 151 of cpc and invoked section 79 of the rera
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri.k. Lokesh Vs. The Bangalore District Maintenance And Welfare Of Pa ...
Court : Karnataka
in m s grasim industries ltd vs collector of customs bombay 2002 4 scc297 it is held as 10 no words various high courts the appeal under section 16 of the act at the instance of donee transferee is maintainable 10 7 l j 605 v dinesh bhanudas chandanshive vs state of maharashtra and others 2024 scc online bom 336 10 learned advocate such conditions are not expressly stated in the transfer deed section 23 of the act cannot be invoked to declare such
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. Lancer Finance Vs. The Competent Authority
Court : Karnataka
commissioner and also the investigation conducted by the superintendent of police the proceedings have been initiated hence i do not find by the state government invoking the provisions of the kpidfe act the records also disclose that section 3 of the act proceedings against the appellants under section 3 as well as section 5 of the act 12 per contra learned counsel for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT