Bombay Police Act 1951 Maharashtra Section 134 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: bombay police act 1951 maharashtra section 134 Page 1 of about 884 results (2.815 seconds)Indian Hotel and Restaurants Association (AHAR), an Association duly r ...
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 2006(3)BomCR705
or beer bar throughout the state by suitably amending the bombay police act 1951 however a provision is also made to to indulge in the same activities again failure of the police to secure a conviction cannot be a valid ground to necessity to maintain essential supplies or the necessity to stop activities inherently dangerous the existence of a machinery to satisfy the section 33 1 w i of the bombay police act 1951 confers powers to make rules for licensing or control in expectations of all concerned in welfare association a r p maharashtra and anr v ranjit p gohil and ors 2003 2scr139 dance performances that may be conducted at establishments covered by section 33 b are not like the one that are intended
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN.P. Nathwani Vs. the Commissioner of Police
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : (1976)78BOMLR1
permission 1 2 1 greater bombay the commissioner of police bombay by order and in the name of the governor of the petitioners to apply for permission of the commissioner of police to hold the proposed meeting because it was urged that by article 19 they could not also challenge any executive action which but for the provisions contained in article 19 the bombay under section 37 3 of the bombay police act 1951 which orders have been and are in operation from june october 14 1975 issued by respondent no 2 state of maharashtra under rule 69 read with rule 1a of the defence question that arose for consideration before the court was whether section 37 3 of the bombay police act 1951 was itself
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamrajsing Sadanandsing Chandele Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : (1979)81BOMLR602
by mr bhimrao naik was that the commandant of the bombay state reserve police force constituted under the bombay state reserve by virtue of section 9 of the bombay state reserve police force act 1951 it is the commandant who is also 9 and 19 of the bombay state reserve police force act 1951 discussed above 20 mr naik submitted that the bombay to the police force constituted under the bombay police act 1951 the state government may establish and maintain armed reserve police to the state reserve police force in the state of maharashtra and is vested with the powers functions and privileges of publication contains matter which is an offence under either of sections 124 a 153 a 153 b 292 293 295a of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShah Kalidas Madhavlal JaIn Vs. B.L. Thakore
Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (1991)1GLR634
granted to him under sections 160 and 161 of the bombay police act 1951 section 160 of the bombay police act consideration for this court is as to whether the defendant police officer was protected under section 160 or 161 of the the protection under section 53 of the madras district police act 1859 was not available after having provided the test the under section 160 or 161 of the bombay police act 1951 as has been said by the learned trial judge as pressed in service the supreme court decision in state of maharashtra v narhar rao 1966crilj1495 in this decision the supreme court case of the plaintiff that the necessary statutory notice under section 18 of the code of civil procedure was duly issued
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSunder Dumanna Shetty Vs. K.D. Billimoria and anr.
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : AIR1959Bom346; (1958)60BOMLR1314
its own costs and i order accordingly 27 mandamus issued bombay police act bom xxii of 1951 sections 33 1 w contains words to the effect that if the commissioner of police is satisfied that the licensee is not a suitable person to the charge under section 110 of the bombay police act 1951 in the show cause notice or in the order accordingly 27 mandamus issued bombay police act bom xxii of 1951 sections 33 1 w 33 7 2 10 167 rules inter alia as to the applicant s good character under section 22 3 of the city of bombay police act 1902 221 the learned chief justice in that case at p 134 of bom lr at p 29 of air observes as
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Bombay Vs. Ganpat Dhondiba Sawant
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : AIR1966Bom228; (1965)67BOMLR852; ILR1966Bom593; 1966MhLJ159
..... under the first part of section 25 of the bombay police act 1951 shantaram v chudasama 1953 56 ..... act chapter ii of the act relates to superintendence control and organization of the police force section 4 in that chapter provides that the superintendence of the police force throughout the state of maharashtra ..... papers relating to the first departmental enquiry 134 the supreme court has clearly made a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. S.P. Kalamkar
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 2008(2)ALLMR649; 2008(2)BomCR575; (2008)110BOMLR512; 2008(4)MhLj553
authority to pass an order under rule 3 of the bombay police punishment and appeals rules 1956 in respect of officers states that no order for reducing removing or dismissing the police officer shall be passed without giving him a reasonable opportunity the bombay police act that the person against whom such action is taken is required to be given an opportunity to followed violation of section 26 of the bombay police act 1951 article 311 of constitution of india inspector appointed by the and usual increments petition dismissed kalamkar challenged the order before maharashtra administrative tribunal which held that the state having failed to bombay police act and non compliance of the requirement of section 26 of the bombay police act would vitiate the order
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Vs. Vishnu Ramchandra
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : (1961)63BOMLR615
was involved in a prosecution under section 124 of the bombay police act he argued that the deputy commissioner of police of the order passed under section 57 of the bombay police act 1951 in the abstract this position seems to be order of externment under section 142 of the bombay police act on the question whether the condition contained in section 57 a prosecution under section 124 of the bombay police act 1951 was pending against the accused this material would not satisfy the case for the statement that the prosecution was under section 411 of the indian penal code it is possible that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRameshchandra Vs. the State
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : AIR1955Bom346; (1955)57BOMLR560; 1955CriLJ1239; ILR1955Bom781
must have been convicted twice of offences under section 9 bombay beggars act 1945 or under the bombay prevention of prostitution to pass an order of externment under section 57 bombay police act in my view there is nothing in article 20 bombay act 4 of 1902 section 27 in the said act corresponds to section 57 in the present act and under externment can be passed under section 57 bombay police act 1951 the point raised by mr dalal under article 20 clause 59 city of bombay police act bom iv of 1902 section 27 2a constitution of india article 20 1 notice under
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Vs. Yamanappa Limbaji Pandhare
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : (1956)58BOMLR551
for eviction or a prosecution under section 132 of the bombay police act but by no stretch of imagination an action a question of construction of section 31 of the bombay police act no xxii of 1951 and the question has arisen warned that if he failed to comply with the notice action under section 31 of the bombay police act 1951 would premises under section 31 2 of the bombay police act 1951 that when the sub inspector came to his quarters to bombay empowered by the state government under section 31 sub section 1 clause b can validly issue an order to the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT