Bombay Non Trading Corporations Act 1959 Maharashtra Section 74 Penalty Contravention Of Section 34 - Judgment Search Results

Center of Indian Trade Union, a Federation of Registered Trade Unions ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

of dabhol power corporation limited for short dpc before the bombay high court 2 though the high court came to the delay and in view of the fact that due to non availability of many persons involved no useful purpose would be jurisdiction special leave petition c no 7734 of1997center of indian trade unions a federation of registered trade unions versus petitioner s board for short the mseb in favour of dabhol power corporation limited for short dpc before the bombay high court 2 of the senior officials would have retired and virtually no action can be taken against them furthermore the commission of inquiry the case to be argued on merits the state of maharashtra subsequently filed an affidavit that due to long efflux of

Satellite Developers Ltd. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

to as the mrtp act the municipal corporation of greater bombay can requisition the land for development for the purposes specified non reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction the peculiar facts of this case and that the municipal corporation has defaulted in certain respects we are of the view pressing its challenge predicated on section 127 of the mrtp act however at the same time it wants some modification of issued by the urban development department of the government of maharashtra it has offered to settle the matter on the terms section 6 of the land acquisition act 1894 read with section 126 of the mrtp act was issued by respondent no the appellant would not be called upon to pay any penalties and the award passed in the case would not come

The Western India Football Association Bombay Vs. Bombay District Foot ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1989Bom189; (1989)91BOMLR439

without the confirmation of their entries by the plaintiffs the bombay district football association rest of the prayers were nto granted 1945 the w i p a was registered as a non trading corporation and thereafter as a public trust under the the w i p a was registered as a non trading corporation and thereafter as a public trust under the bombay w i p a was registered as a non trading corporation and thereafter as a public trust under the bombay public will bear their own costs 28 appeal allowed specific relief act 47 of 1963 section 34 built by appellant association claiming body or organisation this however will not apply retrospectively before 1959 18 mr jan s submission is that this bye law as the bombay city and suburbs in the state of maharashtra are concerned and for a further directaration that the w costs 28 appeal allowed specific relief act 47 of 1963 section 34 built by appellant association claiming right to organise national made to it by any member of the federation the penalty in such cases shall be suspension of the club and 28 appeal allowed specific relief act 47 of 1963 section 34 built by appellant association claiming right to organise national championship

Indian Hotel and Restaurants Association (AHAR), an Association duly r ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(3)BomCR705

may be summarised as under i section 33a of the bombay police act 2005 does not fall within the legislative competence the widest possible amplitude of its powers must be adopted none of the items in the lists is to be read how the court had earlier come to the conclusion that trading in liquor is an activity res extra commercium the learned some undisclosed and unknown reasons for subjecting certain individuals or corporations to hostile or discriminating legislation supra once the initial burden case against shri vilas satam and paresh patil who were acting as agents of shri r r patil a breach of as held in mohd hanif quareshi v state of bihar 1959 1scr629 known as qureshi i and subsequent judgments in that entertainment of men is part of the cultural tradition of maharashtra and illustrations are given of lavani tamashas etc which are bombay police act 2005 may be summarised as under i section 33a of the bombay police act 2005 does not fall drastic restriction may ensure the object intended to be achieved 74 the learned advocate general in his submissions in support of the matter of sentencing to provide in what cases the punishment should act as a deterrent and a case where discretion in an eating house permit room or beer bar in contravention of sub section 1 shall on conviction be punished with 14 of the constitution a perusal of para 31 to 34 of the reply filed by youraj laxman waghmare shows that

Hindustan Lever and Others Vs. Hindustan Lever Mazdoor Sabha and Other ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1994SC834; JT1993(5)SC459; 1994LabIC70; (1994)ILLJ668SC; 1993(3)SCALE894; 1994Supp(1)SCC1; [1993]Supp2SCR540

judgment of this court in security guards board for greater bombay and thane distt v security personnel service pvt ltd and iii it is arbitrary and iv it is vitiated by non application of mind an additional challenge is to the retrospectivity pune rs 3000 pimpri chinchwad and nashik per month municipal corporations including awbad satpur nidc of nashik 3 iii all areas workman means a workman as defined in the industrial disputes act 1947 xiv of 1947 or an employee as defined in conferred by sub section 1 of section 13 of the maharashtra workmen s minimum house rent allowance act 1983 mah xxiii also in total contravention of provisions of section 13 7 section 4 which is the soul of the act makes every the act particularly section 4 and is also in total contravention of provisions of section 13 7 section 4 which is

Sharmila Yadav vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

to both the corporations as their head offices are at bombay she is entitled to certain benefits including maternity leave in of pregnancy this became the ground and reason for her non promotion as assistant sub inspector m with her batch mates stand in the way of her continuing in service the corporations represented to us that pregnancy leads to a number of in service then under the provisions of the maternity benefit act 1961 and the maharashtra maternity rules 1965 these apply to the provisions of the maternity benefit act 1961 and the maharashtra maternity rules 1965 these apply to both the corporations as

Smt. Indirabai Bhalchandra Bhajekar, Vs. the Pune Municipal Corporatio ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR4251

and on the same day it stood transferred to the bombay municipal corporation the writ petition came to be filed on property land acquisition acquisition for public purposes acquisition deemed illegal non compliance of requisite procedure section 72 of maharashtra regional town on both these counts we have held against the municipal corporation the notice dated 2 12 1997 seeking possession of the of this chapter are subject to the provisions of the act the provisions precedent to section 59 are from section 1 34 of the act bombay court fees act 36 of 1959 schedule i article 3 schedule ii article 1 f iii 1 corporation by the urban department of the government of maharashtra vide its letter dated 6 1 1987 however at that effect in the official gazette in the manner provided in section 6 of the land acquisition act 1894 i of 1994 holder thereafter the provisions of appeal are prescribed under section 74 before the tribunal and in the event there is a general clauses act as reference to the provisions of section 34 of the 1996 act so far as an appeal filed

Maharashtra Vikrikar Karamchari Sangathan Vs. the State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2000SC622; JT2000(1)SC132; 2000(1)SCALE105; (2000)2SCC552; [2000]1SCR166; 2000(3)SLJ1(SC); (2000)1UPLBEC874

writ petition be dismissed the learned division bench of the bombay high court after considering the rival contentions found that the 1977 1scr1037 and it was held that if it became non feasible and impracticable for the state to fill up the a statute no rational distinction can be made between the trading and non trading activities of the state iii there is engineering officers association v state of maharashtra 1990 2scr900 municipal corporation of delhi v gurnam kaur air1989sc38 and a r antulay was not statutorily recognized either by incorporating it in different acts or in any general clauses act at the most it such course is followed the action of the government of maharashtra and the commissioner of sales tax would be violative of though the expression fine is used in effect and substance section 541 is a mode of realization of the fee payable corporation of calcutta filed a complaint against the state for contravention thereof the trial magistrate accepting the state s contention that ratio of 60 40 however during the said period only 346 direct recruits were available and they were appointed balance of

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation and anr. Vs. Casteribe Ra ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2009(11)SC609; (2009)IVLLJ286SC; 2009(12)SCALE25; (2009)8SCC556; 2009(9)LC4242(SC):2009AIRSCW6104

and the corporation before the high court of judicature at bombay appellate side in five separate writ petitions 5 of schedule this court stated that courts cannot create a post where none exists in paragraph 37 of the report this court held enacted with an object to provide for the recognition of trade unions for facilitating collective bargaining for certain undertakings to state held that the complaint regarding unfair labour practice against the corporation under item 6 of schedule iv was not maintainable however in an undertaking to which the provisions of industrial disputes act applies shall be allowed to appear or act or be relied upon general standing order no 503 dated 19th june 1959 and the decision by the constitution bench of this court benefits of permanency applicable to post of cleaners appeal dismissed maharashtra recognition of trade unions prevention of unfair labour practices act the same in such manner as may be prescribed 17 section 32 provides that the court shall have the powers to nasik zilla sheth kamgar union and ors 2001 7 scc 346 and karnataka state road transport corporation and anr v s

LandT Finance Limited Vs. M/s. Saumya Mining Ltd and Others

Court : Mumbai

subjected to stamp duty in maharashtra under the provisions of bombay stamp act 1958 it is however case of the petitioner by a non banking financial company or a class of non banking financial companies or non banking financial companies generally as jindal praxair oxygen co ltd patel roadways ltd v prasad trading co manu sc 0280 1992 devidatt v shrirammanu mh 0157 act 1968 25 of 1968 in so far as other corporations are concerned g the portugese commercial code in so far companies like n b f cs in the present case activities were not being regulated by any laws of the parliament differential stamp duty is concerned in view of section of maharashtra stamp act three months time is provided from the date to the interest of the non banking financial company under section ec 45 ja which reads as follows 45 ja power and after having obtained such certificate on payment of statutory penalty within a period of three months from the date the by the purported borrower the demand promissory note is in contravention of provisions of section 40 of bengal money lenders act maharashtra stamp act 1958 section 3 b section 33 section 34 transfer of property act 1882 loan agreement non repayment