Bombay Non Trading Corporations Act 1959 Maharashtra Section 74 Penalty Contravention Of Section 34 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: bombay non trading corporations act 1959 maharashtra section 74 penalty contravention of section 34 Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 527 results (2.884 seconds)Bowring Institute Vs. Mr. Sarwik S
Court : Karnataka
not argued the matter on main with regard to the non compliance of order 39 rule 3 of cpc is concerned orders of injunction particularly in shiv kumar chadha vs municipal corporation of delhi reported in 1993 3 scc161 176 and extracted on the date of filing the suit no cause of action for the said relief since general body has not yet the arbitration and conciliation act regarding interim relief exercising under section 9 also taken note of and also discussed in detail delhi reported in 1993 3 scc161 176 and extracted paragraphs 34 and 35 of the said judgment 119 the counsel also
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub R ...
Court : Karnataka
the said loan accounts the loan account was treated as non performing asset as per reserve bank of india hereinafter referred which the sub registrar sridevi dr senthilnathan smt devi have acted in registering the documents which could never have been registered floor no 29 senapati bapat marg dadar west mumbai city maharashtra 400028 represented by its authorised signatory mr harish kumar petitioner and issued a notice in terms of subsection 2 of section 13 of the sarfaesi act and in terms of the of the karnataka stamp act 1957 i e it attracts penalty for executing etc instrument not duly stamped and they have that the necessary enquiry be made in this regard also 34 4 in that view of the matter i answer point
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. Lancer Finance Vs. The Competent Authority
Court : Karnataka
on record the trial court comes to the conclusion that none of these documents reveal as to payment made by the this court paragraph no 11 wherein the judgment of vishnu traders vs state of haryana reported in 1995 suppl1scc461was discussed and cause harm to the respondents at the instigation of the corporator one sri nagabhushan and the then s p mysore sri and other proceedings have been initiated without any cause of action it is further contended that the petition filed by the court discussion made in paragraph no 22 wherein also sub section 1 of section 4 of the act was discussed and offence punishable under sections 406 420 506 read with section 34 of ipc and section 9 of the act observations are
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri.k. Lokesh Vs. The Bangalore District Maintenance And Welfare Of Pa ...
Court : Karnataka
to frustrate it 22 in dinesh banudas chandanshive supra the bombay high court held as 25 insofar as the contention of available to be invoked by late p krishna father for non compliance of its conditions it is the submission that the may be made to m ramnarain p ltd v state trading corpn of india ltd 1983 3 scc75 and gujarat agro in sy no 17 3 situated at subbanna garden adugodi corporation ward no 70 4 nc 2024 khc 53004 db wa assistant commissioner has invoked remedy under section 16 of the act by filing an appeal before the 10 nc 2024 khc l j 605 v dinesh bhanudas chandanshive vs state of maharashtra and others 2024 scc online bom 336 10 learned advocate of appeal against such an order which is governed by section 16 of the act while two parties may potentially be with some imagination of the purposes which lie behind them 34 in harbhajan singh vs press council of india and others
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAsset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Regist ...
Court : Karnataka
the said loan accounts the loan account was treated as non performing asset as per reserve bank of india hereinafter referred the reserve bank of india under section 3 of sarfaesi act 5 the facts in each of the above petitions are floor no 29 senapati bapat marg dadar west mumbai city maharashtra 400028 represented by its authorised signatory mr harish kumar petitioner sarfaesi act the petitioner is also a financial institution under section 2 h ia of recovery of debts due to banks of the karnataka stamp act 1957 i e it attracts penalty for executing etc instrument not duly stamped and they have a document let alone be registered by a sub registrar 34 answer to point no 3 whether a sub registrar could
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Re ...
Court : Karnataka
the said loan accounts the loan account was treated as non performing asset as per reserve bank of india hereinafter referred or entity if found to be involved in any illegal acts v a report relating to the above to be placed floor no 29 senapati bapat marg dadar west mumbai city maharashtra 400028 represented by its authorised signatory mr harish kumar petitioner passed by the senior sub registrar peenya bangalore as per section 33 of the karnataka stamp act 1957 b to declare of the karnataka stamp act 1957 i e it attracts penalty for executing etc instrument not duly stamped and they have basic provison s of karnataka stamp law i e sec 34 instruments not duly stamped inadmissible in evidence etc and whereas
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s H M Infra Tech Pvt Ltd Vs. H M Tamborine Apartments Owners Associa ...
Court : Karnataka
a party the suit is liable to be dismissed for non joinder of necessary party the plaintiff is not entitled for judgment reported in 2007 4 scc697in the case of food corporation of india vs chandu construction and another and brought to under section 3 to prospectively follow the mandate of the act 2016 the issue that whether the act 2016 is 19 reject the plaint invoking order vii rule 11 read with section 151 of cpc and invoked section 79 of the rera 1 15 509 square feet and remaining land is only 34 717 square feet it is also contend that the modified
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMs. X Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
persons protection of rights act 2019 affidavit should be on non judicial stamp paper of rs 10 competent notary civil district health officer registrar of birth and death certificate mangaluru city corporation m g road lalbaug mangaluru 575 003 respondents by sri no 55559 of 2017 20 section 5 of the transgender act is reproduced hereunder for easy reference 5 application for certificate rule transgender persons protection of rights rules 2020 read with section 6 7 of the transgender persons protection of rights act 24 nc 2024 khc 49110 wp no 55559 of 2017 34 not surprisingly the first of the documents mentioned therein is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri. Chennakeshava Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
under the indian penal code or under the karnataka police act then it will not be competent on the part of d of section 5 taking cognizance of the offence under sections 420 and 447 of ipc by the special court is brought to notice of this court that section 5 contemplates penalty for offences in connection with the land grabbing as enumerated
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr Mohankumar M Vs. State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
it amounts to an abetment under the prevention of corruption act 44 the trial court having considered the material available on case of dhariwal19tobacco products limited and others v state of maharashtra and another reported in 2009 2 scc370with regard to the scc709 wherein discussion was made with regard to scope of sections 227 228 239 and 240 of cr p c in main accused in the prevention of corruption act is acquitted conviction against the abettor does not survive 10 the learned counsel
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT