Bombay Non Trading Corporations Act 1959 Maharashtra Section 74 - Judgment Search Results

Center of Indian Trade Union, a Federation of Registered Trade Unions ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

of dabhol power corporation limited for short dpc before the bombay high court 2 though the high court came to the non reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction jurisdiction special leave petition c no 7734 of1997center of indian trade unions a federation of registered trade unions versus petitioner s has elapsed since the first ppa was executed the foreign corporation and the original project proponents are no longer 6 available of the senior officials would have retired and virtually no action can be taken against them furthermore the commission of inquiry while the special leave petition was pending the state of maharashtra appointed a committee headed by dr mahdav godbole former home

Satellite Developers Ltd. Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

to as the mrtp act the municipal corporation of greater bombay can requisition the land for development for the purposes specified non reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction letter dated december 26 2016 be accepted whereas the municipal corporation impressed upon this court to dispose of the matter in recreation ground was reduced to 2000 sq mts the mrtp act further provides for acquisition of such land by agreement or tardeo division mumbai admeasuring 10 394 sq mts under the maharashtra regional and town planning act 1966 hereinafter referred to as due diligence even after service of notice upon them under section 127 of the act at the same time the high

The Western India Football Association Bombay Vs. Bombay District Foot ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1989Bom189; (1989)91BOMLR439

such in his tournament teants from outside the territory of bombay are invited it is in that sense it is an 1945 the w i p a was registered as a non trading corporation and thereafter as a public trust under the the w i p a was registered as a non trading corporation and thereafter as a public trust under the bombay w i p a was registered as a non trading corporation and thereafter as a public trust under the bombay public thereafter as a public trust under the bombay public trust act this association then took the place of the original company body or organisation this however will not apply retrospectively before 1959 18 mr jan s submission is that this bye law as many as 24 district association in the state of maharashtra and they are members of the w i p fa costs 28 appeal allowed specific relief act 47 of 1963 section 34 built by appellant association claiming right to organise national

Bharti Tele-ventures Limited, a Company Incorporated Under the Compani ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR841; 2007(2)BomCR925; (2007)109BOMLR585; 2007(4)MhLj105

inspection issued notices firstly under section 260 1 of the bombay provincial municipal corporations act 1949 hereinafter called as the bpmc beyond the permissible height of the building and there is non permissible use of terrace and therefore the same could be not been defined under the mrtp act or under the corporations act the schedule annexed to the mrtp act does not clearly provides that the delegation of powers under the telegraph act is restricted to seek way leave from the private owners b a council and a nagar panchayat constituted under the maharashtra municipal councils nagar panchayats and industrial townships act 1965 c the power of the local authority to give permission under section 10 clause c of the proviso thereto it provides that

Smt. Indirabai Bhalchandra Bhajekar, Vs. the Pune Municipal Corporatio ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR4251

..... section 72 of maharashtra regional town planning act 1966 mrtp act petitioners filed petition praying for a declaration that acquisition of suit plot was illegal as there was non compliance of requisite procedures under mrtp act by respondent municipal corporation ..... under section 34 of the act bombay court fees act 36 of 1959 ..... arbitrator under section 74 of the act section 74 reads as under 74 appeal .....

Mafatlal Industries Ltd. and Others Vs. Municipal Corporation of Great ...

Court : Mumbai

further followed and approved in the municipal corporation of greater bombay and anr vs yeshwant jagannath vaity and ors for this court 12 the submissions of delay latches and the non compliances within time as sought to be contended are also a reason to deny entitlement of petitioners therefore respondent corporation is under obligation to grant benefits reliefs as prayed having to costs development control regulations for greater mumbai 1991 mrtp act 1966 development agreement entered circular issued with stipulations natvar parikh and co pvt ltd vs the state of maharashtra and ors writ petition no 451 of 2010 dated 22 2008 and work has already been completed the sanction under section 270 a of the bmc act is obtained part certification

The Best Workers Union Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2010(2)BomCR309; 2010(1)SCALE450

in regulation 9 of the development control regulations for greater bombay 1991 and inserted an explanation into it vide notification dated development in residential zone thewould be approx 39 921 expected non refundablesqm 4 22 772 sqft subject premium has been worked 1974 for its different purposes 3 the petitioner is a trade union of the workers of the best and it is appearing on the same side in this case and the corporation in strongly supporting the stand of the best it was person affected within the meaning of section 37 of the act and it was therefore entitled to a personal notice and dated july 27 2006 issued under section 37 2 of maharashtra regional and town planning act 1966 the act hereinafter on it was not an affected person within the meaning of section 37 1 of the act he further added that the

Ballarpur Industries Limited Vs. Maharashtra Lok Kamgar Sanghatana and ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

act came to be repealed and the provisions of the bombay industrial relations act 1946 for short bir act were made separate pool and which has continued for years together and none of the workers of this pool had ever complained or of 1987 under section 28 of the maharashtra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act 1971 hereinafter 147 10 mineral exploration corporation employees union vs mineral exploration corporation ltd and anr reported in 2006 iii clr 956 practice under item no 9 of schedule iv of the act euro ldquo however evidence which is led on behalf of industrial establishment had certified standing orders prior to 15 1 1959 i e prior to coming into force of the industrial ulp no 1286 of 1987 under section 28 of the maharashtra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices material to establish that the standing orders as certified under section 30 of the c p and berar act existed he

Chief Engineer, Irrigation Vibhag (Govt. of Maharashtra), Sinchan Bhav ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

ltd vs p s rajgopalan air 1964 sc 743 2 bombay gas co limited vs gopal bhiva and others air 1964 background the labour court drew an adverse inference due to non production of documents relying upon decisions of this court the iv r w section 28 of the maharashtra recognition of trade unions and prevention of the unfair labour practices act 1971 is confirmed petition dismissed para 15 cases referred municipal corporation of delhi vs ganesh razaq and others 1995 1 scc was filed by respondent under section 33c 2 of the act 1947 was filed claiming difference of wages before industrial court there from 7 1991 mh l j 1557 state of maharashtra vs m v ghalge and another 8 chima shravan shinde it is true there is no period of limitation under section 33c 2 of the act but that does not mean of india ltd vs p s rajgopalan air 1964 sc 743 2 bombay gas co limited vs gopal bhiva and others

Wipro Products Limited and Another Vs. the State of Maharashtra and An ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1989]72STC69(Bom)

1 challenge to the vires of section 13aa of the bombay sales tax act 1959 as introduced by maharashtra act no being styled as despatch tax or consignment tax is wholly non existent as against which in contrast the reality makes it purchase vegetable non essential oil vne oil from the state trading corporation of india as also from other indigenous local sources vegetable non essential oil vne oil from the state trading corporation of india as also from other indigenous local sources this or purchase of which is liable to tax under the act qualify the term goods and exclude by necessary implication goods vires of section 13aa of the bombay sales tax act 1959 as introduced by maharashtra act no 28 of 1982 essentially the sale or purchase of goods in the state of maharashtra it is on the basis of these composite contentions that challenge to the vires and validity of the provisions of section 13aa of the act as introduced in the bombay sales