Bombay Non Trading Corporations Act 1959 Maharashtra Section 74 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: bombay non trading corporations act 1959 maharashtra section 74 Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 418 results (2.397 seconds)Bowring Institute Vs. Mr. Sarwik S
Court : Karnataka
the case on hand also no reasons are assigned and non compliance of order 39 rule 3 as contended by the orders of injunction particularly in shiv kumar chadha vs municipal corporation of delhi reported in 1993 3 scc161 176 and extracted on the date of filing the suit no cause of action for the said relief since general body has not yet this m f a is filed under order43rule1r r w section151of cpc praying to set side the order dated2211 2024 passed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub R ...
Court : Karnataka
the said loan accounts the loan account was treated as non performing asset as per reserve bank of india hereinafter referred the several articles of the schedule to the karnataka stamp act 1957 and failure to adhere to the provisions of sec floor no 29 senapati bapat marg dadar west mumbai city maharashtra 400028 represented by its authorised signatory mr harish kumar petitioner passed by the senior sub registrar peenya bangalore as per section 33 of the karnataka stamp act 1957 b to declare
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. Lancer Finance Vs. The Competent Authority
Court : Karnataka
who had conducted the investigation has also reported as to non payment of the deposited amount to the depositors even after this court paragraph no 11 wherein the judgment of vishnu traders vs state of haryana reported in 1995 suppl1scc461was discussed and cause harm to the respondents at the instigation of the corporator one sri nagabhushan and the then s p mysore sri government from exercising its power under the provisions of the act and to attach the property of the financial establishment and the offence punishable under sections 406 420 506 read with section 34 of ipc and section 9 of the act observations
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri.k. Lokesh Vs. The Bangalore District Maintenance And Welfare Of Pa ...
Court : Karnataka
to frustrate it 22 in dinesh banudas chandanshive supra the bombay high court held as 25 insofar as the contention of available to be invoked by late p krishna father for non compliance of its conditions it is the submission that the may be made to m ramnarain p ltd v state trading corpn of india ltd 1983 3 scc75 and gujarat agro in sy no 17 3 situated at subbanna garden adugodi corporation ward no 70 4 nc 2024 khc 53004 db wa the deputy commissioner in the exercise of jurisdiction under the act cannot annul the rights vested with the appellant under the l j 605 v dinesh bhanudas chandanshive vs state of maharashtra and others 2024 scc online bom 336 10 learned advocate advocate for respondent no 2 has raised a contention that section 23 of the act is not available to be invoked
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAsset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Regist ...
Court : Karnataka
the said loan accounts the loan account was treated as non performing asset as per reserve bank of india hereinafter referred of 2017 instruments u s 33 of the k s act 1957 reg with reference to the above an instrument of floor no 29 senapati bapat marg dadar west mumbai city maharashtra 400 028 represented by its authorized signatory mr khezar khan to arcil 9 pursuant to the assignment in terms of section 5 4 of the sarfaesi act arcil being entitled to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Re ...
Court : Karnataka
stamp s has lossed huge amount of revenue due to non levy of proper stamp duty on this instrument hence in by its promoter dr senthilnathan have indulged in various illegal activities 21 3 by referring to the letter of the senior floor no 29 senapati bapat marg dadar west mumbai city maharashtra 400028 represented by its authorised signatory mr harish kumar petitioner 1993 and registered with the reserve bank of india under section 3 of sarfaesi act 5 the facts in each of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s H M Infra Tech Pvt Ltd Vs. H M Tamborine Apartments Owners Associa ...
Court : Karnataka
a party the suit is liable to be dismissed for non joinder of necessary party the plaintiff is not entitled for judgment reported in 2007 4 scc697in the case of food corporation of india vs chandu construction and another and brought to to the interference and causing of obstruction and cause of action is also mentioned as 09 12 2016 when the averments no 10 filed under order vii rule 11 read with section 151 of cpc in o s no 8454 2016 is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMs. X Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
persons protection of rights act 2019 affidavit should be on non judicial stamp paper of rs 10 competent notary civil district health officer registrar of birth and death certificate mangaluru city corporation m g road lalbaug mangaluru 575 003 respondents by sri with section 6 of the transgender persons protection of rights act 2019 1 on the basis of the application dated dd barely on account of the person being transgender 15 under section 4 there is a right conferred on the transgender person
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrindavan Hydropower Private Limited Vs. Union Of India
Court : Karnataka
with the state governments the responsibility and obligation to facilitate non discriminatory open access is only on the regulatory commissions 66 the power to issue licences for transmission distribution and electricity trading in short all aspects of determination of tariff and regulation 5 state load dispatch center managed by karnataka power transmission corporation limited a nodal agency established under section31of the electricity act2003 as already stated above the parliament has enacted the electricity act with the underlying purpose of de licensing the entire electricity karnataka560082 also palnt office at gat no 438 chipri kolhapur maharashtra416101 3 sanjay d ghodawat huf a company registered under the is aggrieved by non redressal of his grievances under sub section 5 may make a representation for the redressal of his another to prepare a plan the central government after consulting 74 nc 2024 khc 53048 wp no 11235 of 2024 c
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr Mohankumar M Vs. State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
it amounts to an abetment under the prevention of corruption act 44 the trial court having considered the material available on case of dhariwal19tobacco products limited and others v state of maharashtra and another reported in 2009 2 scc370with regard to the enforcement directorate and charge sheeted for the offences punishable under sections 13 d 13 2 of pc act and accused no
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT