Court : Mumbai
Reported in : AIR1980Bom1; (1980)82BOMLR253; 1979MhLJ614
..... therefore, according to the learned counsel, in spite of the fact that bhir has now become a part of state of bombay as a result of the states reorganisation act, the effect of the hyderabad high court decision must still be so construed that within the territory within which that decree was operative at the material time, it ..... court or judicial commissioner's court for an existing state, in fact creates a new high court for the new state of bombay as constituted by the states reorganisation act and the effect of the provisions of section 52 read with article 261 of the constitution of india should be that the decree of dismissal of the plaintiff' ..... substantially three questions have been argued before us by mr. deshpande appearing on behalf of the judgment-debtor. his first contention was that section 52 of the states reorganisation act, which provides that the high court for a new state shall have in respect of any part of the territories included in the new state all such original, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... order to dispose of the inquiry within 8 months, subject to grant of extension.4. meanwhile, the unified state of bihar was bifurcated into the state of bihar and the state of jharkhand through the bihar reorganisation act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the reorganisation act ). 15th november, 2000 was fixed to be the appointed day for such bifurcation. the 1st respondent was allotted/transferred to jharkhand cadre. in ..... at patna in cr.w.j.c. no.352 of 2002. by the impugned judgment the high court giving reference to the provisions of bihar reorganisation act, 2000 held that the impugned fir instituted on 20th august, 2002 by state of bihar, much after the appointed day is not maintainable and quashed the fir.2. the factual matrix of the case is as follows: the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : [2004]137STC269(MP)
..... eligible on november 19, 1996 as per the eligibility criteria fixed under the rules and the benefit of deferment was granted for a period of 11 years. on november 1, 2000 the reorganisation act, 2000 came into force by which the erstwhile state of madhya pradesh was bifurcated into two successor states, namely, state of madhya pradesh and state of chhattisgarh. the state of ..... scc 705 the apex court placed reliance on balbir singh air 1977 sc 629 and came to hold that section 88 of the punjab reorganisation act is similar to section 26 of bihar and u.p. (alteration of boundaries) act, 1968.13. in this regard we may profitably refer to a division bench decision rendered in the case of commissioner, commercial taxes, ranchi v .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... ranjan sinha (supra), the controversy revolved around the applicability of laws framed by the undivided state of bihar with the newly bifurcated state that have come into existence by virtue of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000 (for short, the 2000 act ). the controversy also related to the service conditions. the issue arose before the high court of ..... jharkhand as to which law was in force and eventually, on scrutiny of the act, the high court came to hold that:- 6 ..... is true that the jharkhand was carved out with effect from 15.11.2000. by virtue of section 84 of the bihar reorganization act, the education regulations applied. in the absence of any modification, alternation or repeal of either the act or the education regulations by the competent legislature, it could not be postulated .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... discussed in the previous segment, the constitution confers legislative and executive powers on the states, which play an indispensable role in our democratic set-up. 357 uttar pradesh reorganisation act 2000 358 bihar reorganisation act 2000 359 andhra pradesh reorganisation act 2014 339 part e these characteristics of states are not usually lost when its boundaries, size, or name are changed.500. states under the indian constitution have their ..... (alteration of name) act 1973, uttaranchal (alteration of name) act 2006, orissa (alteration of name) act 2011. 350 bombay reorganisation act 1960 351 state of nagaland act 1962 352 north-eastern areas (reorganisation) act 1971 353 assam reorganisation (meghalaya) act 1969 354 punjab reorganisation act 1966 355 madhya pradesh reorganisation act 2000 356 constitution (thirty-sixth amendment) act 1975 338 part e pradesh.357 similarly, jharkhand was carved out of the state of bihar.358 most recently .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... be in employment before the appointed day, therefore, the instant provision would not apply to his case. (viii) provisions relating to section 89 of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000 would also not apply to the case of the petitioner as no proceedings were pending before the appointed day before a court, tribunal or authority in an area ..... of the petitioner arose before the creation of the state of jharkhand and the high court of jharkhand. (v) in terms of section 34 of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000 pending proceedings in the high court at patna immediately before the appointed day could be transferred to the high court of jharkhand by order of the chief ..... could be granted to the petitioner against the state of jharkhand even if he succeeds in his challenge. (iv) in terms of section 27 of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000 the high court of jharkhand derived jurisdiction, powers and authorities as, under the law in force immediately before the appointed day in respect of any part of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... rules, 1963 is not applicable to the civil judge (junior division) appointed under jharkhand judicial service (recruitment) rules, 2004. he contended that in view of sections 84 and 85 of bihar reorganisation act, 2000 the training and departmental examination rules, 1963 were deemed to have been operating in the newly created state of jharkhand, however the said rules have been repealed after the framing ..... . before examining the rival contentions the ambit and extent of sections 84 and 85 need to be examined. on 15.11.2000, state of jharkhand was created under the bihar reorganisation act, 2000. section 84 made the law inforce in the existing state of bihar immediately before the appointed day applicable in the newly created state of jharkhand, until otherwise provided by the competent legislature or .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... be in employment before the appointed day, therefore, the instant provision would not apply to his case. (viii) provisions relating to section 89 of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000 would also not apply to the case of the petitioner as no proceedings were pending before the appointed day before a court, tribunal or authority in an area ..... of the petitioner arose before the creation of the state of jharkhand and the high court of jharkhand. (v) in terms of section 34 of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000 pending proceedings in the high court at patna immediately before the appointed day could be transferred to the high court of jharkhand by order of the chief ..... could be granted to the petitioner against the state of jharkhand even if he succeeds in his challenge. (iv) in terms of section 27 of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000 the high court of jharkhand derived jurisdiction, powers and authorities as, under the law in force immediately before the appointed day in respect of any part of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
..... subject to only confirmation of actual figures.12. learned counsel for j.s.e.b, submitted that as per the provisions contained in section 62 read with eighth schedule of bihar reorganisation act, 2000, the liabilities in respect of pensionary dues of employees retiring from the area now forming part of j.s.e.b. and whose claims are outstanding immediately before that day ..... . undisputedly, jharkhand government issued a notification on 10-1-2001 creating jharkhand state electricity board under the provisions of section 1(4) of the electricity (supply) act, 1948 read with section 62(4) of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000 and requested the central government to make provisions enabling the new board to take over from existing board all or any of its undertakings, assests, rights .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... has already been clarified in this department s office memorandum dated 20-12-2000.26. under section 76, the central government is empowered to give such directions to the state government of bihar and the state government of jharkhand, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of the bihar reorganisation act, the state government is bound to comply with such directions. by letter ..... singh (supra) , the hon'ble supreme court while considering the provisions of sections 76 and 89 of the bihar re-organization act, 2000 in respect to a vigilance case instituted much after appointed day, it was held as follows:- 22. part viii of the reorganisation act relates to provisions as to the services . under section 76 the central government has been empowered to give such .....
Tag this Judgment!