Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1959Raj149
..... courts and a narrow interpretation should not be placed on the term 'court.' according to learned counsel, that section, just like section 14 of the indian limitation act, is based on principles of justice, equity and good conscience and there is no reason why a plaintiff, who has been prosecuting with due diligence another civil proceeding ..... of india and thereafter it became a part of the union of india. the state of ajmer also merged into the state of rajasthan under the states reorganization act, 1956, and therefore, the contention raised by the appellants was not tenable. in view of the said objections, the learned judges of the division bench thought ..... to purchase and sale of silver and bales of cotton-yarn, at kishangarh, through the commission agency of the plaintiffs, from bhadaw vad 12, sarnwat 2000 to kartik sud 15, samwat 2000.these transactions resulted in an outstanding balance in favour of the plaintiffs agninst the defendants for an amount of rs. 11,454/15/-. the plaintiffs .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1962Raj218
..... november, 1956, which was also the appointed day under the states reorganisation act, 1956, and by section 2 of this act for the first schedule to the constitution as amended by the states reorganisation act, 1956, and the bihar and west bengal (transfer of territories) act, 1956, the schedule as mentioned thereunder was substituted and according to ..... possibly be accepted that the central government was the appropriate government qua the ajmer area by virtue of anything contained in section 120 of the states reorganisation act, 1956. consequently, we have no hesitation in coming to the conclusion that the contention that the rajasthan government was not competent to issue the ..... issued by the government. the learned government advocate, however, endeavoured hard to meet this objection by placing his reliance on section 119 of the states reorganisation act, 1956. section 119 reads as follows; 'territorial extent of laws. the provisions of part ii shall not be deemed to have effected any change .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1973Raj244; 1973()WLN52
..... bhargava reioined that aimer was a part 'c' state upto the 31st of october. 1956 and it merged under the states reorganisation, act, 1956 with theunited state of raiasthan on and from the 1st of november, 1956. the act applied to that part of the state of raiasthan which was originallv a part 'c' state and became merged in the united ..... whilst the high courts at allahabad and nagpur upheld the validity of the corresponding legisla-tive measures passed in uttar pradesh and madhya pradesh respectively. (see kameshwar v. state of bihar. air 1951pat. 91 (sb) and surva pal v. u. p. government, air 1951 all 674 (fb).) the parties aggrieved by these respective decisions had filed appeals by ..... the courts of law on the ground that thev contravened the fundamental rights guaranteed to the citizens by part iii. these measures had been passed in bihar. uttar pradesh and madhya pradesh and validity was impeached in the high courts in the said three states. the high court of patna held that the relevant .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : (1963)IILLJ43Raj
..... as than. in exercise of the powers conferred by 01. (a) of sub-section (1) of section 3 and sub-section (2) of section 5,of the minimum wages act, 1948 (act xi of 1948), the chief commissioner, ajmer, fixed the minimum wages payable to employees employed in the employment in public motor transport by notification no. 9/5/54 lab., dated ..... notification (ex.1) and the employers were not liable to pay the allowance as mentioned in para. 5 of the ajmer notification. sri chandradhar issar, authority under the minimum wages act, 1948, has taken the view that as there was a rise of 25 points in the cost of living index, as mentioned in para. 5, of the ajmer notification dated ..... base had risen above 20 points or more. this does not appear to have been disputed before him. paragraphs of the claim application before the authority under the minimum wages act has not been challenged so far as the assertion of increase in cost of living index is concerned. it is too late in the day to argue that when even .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : [1996]86CompCas286(Raj); 1994(3)WLC323; 1993WLN(UC)231
..... in exercise of the powers under sub-section (2) of section 44 of the rajasthan high court ordinance, 1949, read with sections 54 and 57 of the state reorganisation act, 1956, the hon'ble chief justice has been pleased to order that with effect from january 31, 1977,-- (a) all cases arising in the revenue districts of ..... cannot be interpreted either having a concurrent jurisdiction or overlapping jurisdiction. in the matter of liquidation of companies as mentioned above section 10 of the companies act confers the jurisdiction on the high court having jurisdiction in relation to the place at which the registered office of the company is situated. the registered ..... official gazette and subject to such restrictions, limitations and conditions as it thinks fit empower any district court to exercise all or any of the jurisdiction conferred by this act upon the court, not being the jurisdiction conferred-- (a) in respect of companies generally, by sections 237, 391, 394, 395 and 397 to 407, both .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1963Raj63
..... of this court on the 6th november, 1959, as the state of ajmer had by that time been integrated with this state as a result of the state reorganiszation act (act xxxi of 1956).while the defendant's review application was pending in this court, the' plaintiff filed an application on the 2nd january, 1958, in the court of ..... receipt of the same date and thus the entire suit stood finally adjusted and deserved to be dismissed. it was further stated in this application that the plaintiff had acted fraudulently in withdrawing his application of withdrawal on the 26th february, 1958, and that the defendant's counsel (shri swaroop narain advocate) was not in the know of ..... lawful agreement' as used in order 23 rule 3 excludes unlawful agreements, that is, agreements the object or consideration for which is unlawful as defined in the contract act and all agreements which on the face of them are void, and that the term should not be interpreted as wide enough to include an inquiry whether the agreement .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1964Raj197
..... , and was transferred to the jaipur bench of this court in november, 1956, on the merger of the erstwhile state of ajmer into the state of rajasthan under the states reorganisation act, 1956. shri mukat behari lal bhargava put in his vakalatnama on behalf of the appel-iant in the court of the judicial commissioner, ajmer, which bears no date, and presumably ..... when he has engaged counsel by a proper writing and has briefed him for the case, the latter is perfectly competent in law to represent the party in court and act and plead on his behalf and the personal appearance of the party is not necessary and cannot be insisted upon unless by virtue of a specific provision of law the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1981WLN(UC)188
..... 17 of the act. this section provides the power to direct amalgamation, division and re-organisation of the co-operative societies in public interest.3. i have heard learned counsel for the parties and ..... or the direction directing the closure of the petitioner's society is quashed. it is made clear that the registrar is at liberty to proceed with the work of reorganisation of the society according to provisions of law. in the circumstances, the parties shall bear their own costs. ..... 's society. the registrar is proceeding according to law as is evident from ex. r/1 and ex. r/2. it in further staled that the registrar has not acted upon the impugned suggestion given by the minister on 22.9.1977. the registrar. cooperative societies, rajasthan, jaipur is proceeding according to law and procedure as provided in section .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1985(1)WLN581
..... witness:fl=;kai;lahkos dk;z ckysu lfkfojs.k ok aaf'k';s.k cu/kquk okfil nklsu hkwrdsu ok aa70aacoming to the modern era, section 118 of the evidence act lays down a general rule that every person, irrespective of his age, is competent to testify unless he is found incompetent due to the reasons mentioned therein. section 118 makes .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1960Raj219
..... -respondents and the sole point for determination is whether the plaintiffs-respondents were rightly given by the trial court the benefit under section 14 of the limitation act to bring within time their suit which was admittedly presented beyond the prescribed period of limitation. the relevant facts may very shortly be stated as follows:--the ..... a joint hindu family firm entered into various transactions of sale and purchase of gold, silver and yarn during period from bhadva vadi 12, samwat 2000 to kartik sudi 15, samwat 2000 through the agency of the plaintiffs' firm, alleging that as a result of these transactions an amount of rs. 11,454/15/-became due ..... in this view of the matter, we have nohesitation in concluding that the trial court wasquite correct in giving the benefit of section 15 of the kishangarh limitation act to the plaintiffs and holding their suit within limitation. there are, therefore, no merits in this appeal. it, therefore, failsand is hereby dismissed. in view of .....
Tag this Judgment!