Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bihar reorganisation act 2000 section 42 land and goods Court: andhra pradesh Page 1 of about 245 results (0.273 seconds)

Nov 24 1967 (HC)

K. Venkata Subbayya Vs. District Collector, Chittoor and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1969AP381

..... court to the high court of madras created by royal charter, it is all the same not a high court established by royal charter and that under the states reorganisation act (act xxxvii of 1956), the jurisdiction of the then existing state of andhra was extended to the whole of the territories transferred to the state from the erstwhile state of ..... area of the erstwhile hyderabad state and as such is not a 'new state' as it is a state formed by the provisions of part ii of the states reorganisation act. in this connection we may also remember that letters patent of 1865 of the high court of madras is made applicable to the high court by virtue of section ..... high court of andhra and its name was changed to high court of judicature, andhra pradesh, by the operation of the states reorganisation act and the jurisdiction and powers of the existing courts on the date of commencement of the act were preserved. the practice and procedure in the andhra high court is stated in section 32 of the andhra state .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 1970 (HC)

Syed Abbas HussaIn Nagri Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1971AP1

..... state of hyderabad was abolished and its three regions were emerged into other states. by virtue of sub-section (2) of section 118 of the states reorganisation act the hyderabad public service commission i.e. a.p. state public service commissioner which was governed by the madras public service commission regulations, 1950 published with ..... hyderabad cadre and recruitment rues, there is no question of obtaining the consent of the central government under the proviso to section 115 of the states reorganisation act. in the appeals before us the question whether the second stage of promotion should also be according to hyderabad rules as no specific prior approval ..... appellants and the 3rd grade clerks are to be simultaneously considered for promotion is illegal as it contravenes the provisions of section 115 of the states reorganisation act.73. having held that the promotion of the appellants was a regular one, even though it was termed temporary or provisional, their reversion amounts to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 1970 (HC)

Sathya Kumar and ors. Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1971AP320

..... with the principles laid down by the conference of chief secretaries referred the list to the advisory committee constituted under section 115(5) of the states reorganiseation act. the state government accepted the advice of the adviosry committee and conveyed their approval in respect of the provisional common gradation list of the district ..... rules governing the service of the protected employees. it is in this connection necessary to bear in mind the proviso to section 115 of the state reorganisation act according tow which provision the service conditions of the protected employees would not be altered affecting them adversely without a prior permission of the government of ..... civil jurisdiction up to rupees 5000/- and also of small cause jurisdiction up to rs. 500/- while the munsif-magistrates had pecuniary civil jurisdiction up rs. 2000/- and small cause jurisdiction upto rs. 50/- only.7. despite the above said difference in the pay scale and the scope of their jurisdiction. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 1960 (HC)

Ramappa (M.) Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (1961)ILLJ569AP

..... the state of andhra pradesh was constituted. that notification reads as follows:in exercise of the powers conferred by section 122 of the states reorganization act, 1956 (central act xxxvii of 1956), the governor of andhra pradesh hereby specifies as respects the authority mentioned in col. (2) of the schedule below as ..... mentioned in the corresponding entry in col. (1) of the said schedule: schedulefunctions authority(1) (2)hyderabad public servants tribunal for(tribunal of inquiry) act, disciplinaryxxii of 1950. proceeding's10. it is immediately plain from this notification that the tribunal for disciplinary proceedings constituted by the government was competent to perform ..... was passed by the madras state and consequently the petitioner had no remedy available against the andhra state under the provisions of the andhra state act. overruling these contentions, the learned judges stated that so far as judicial officers are concerned, it was not competent for the government to refer .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 2005 (HC)

Satish Chandra Makan Vs. Dr. S.V.S. Sastry and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(1)ALD145

..... justified classification of geographical regions for historical reason may cease to be valid. a purely temporary provision which because of compelling forces justified differential treatment when the reorganisation act was enacted cannot obviously be permitted to assume permanency, so as to perpetuate that treatment without a rational basis to support it after the initial expediency and ..... have already held that the sales tax law in vindhya pradesh was validly enacted, and it brought its validity with it under section 119 of the states reorganisation act, when it became a part of the state of madhya pradesh. thereafter, the different laws in different parts of madhya pradesh can be sustained on the ..... -12-1983 on the premise that the said issue has already been decided by a full bench of this court in m. sreeramulu v. tahera yousuf kadri : 2000(3)ald173 (fb), and in not examining the validity of the said g.o. in terms of the decision of the supreme court reported in malpe vishwanath acharya .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 1976 (HC)

i. Narasimha Rao and ors. Vs. Govt. of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1977AP178

..... .29. we can straightway dispose of the contention based upon explanation iv which merely says that under the act, 'telengana area' means the territories specified in sub-section (1) of section 3 of the state reorganisation act, 1956 and 'andhra area' means the territories of the state of andhra pradesh other than the telengana area ..... relevantwe shall read explanation iv also as a contention was raised with respect to that too.'in this act , 'telengana area' means the territories specified in sub-section (i) of section 3 of the states reorganisation act 1956 and 'andhra area' means the territories of the state of andhra pradesh other than the telengana ..... discriminated against leaving us at the mercy of the authorities who had to decide arbitrarily for want of specific guide lines in the provisions of the act and the rules made thereunder. therefore, it is prayed to provide guidelines by way of executive instructions and by making appropriate rules for this purpose .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 31 1993 (HC)

Jagriti Vs. the State and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1994AP225; 1994(1)ALT376

..... . in delegating such powers, parliament cannot 'abdicate' its legislative functions in favour of such authority'.the supreme court upheld the validity of section 87 of the punjab reorganisation act, which empowered the central government to extend the union territory of chandigarh any law in force in any part of india.10 17. on a consideration of the ..... any law in any part of country to union territory of chandigarh after independence, ampounted to failure or excessive delegation of legislative powers. section 87 of the punjab reorganisation act (31 of 1966) conferred power on the central government to extend to the territory of chandigarh, any law in force in any part of india. the court ..... in general terms. but this much is clear that it cannot include a change of policy.'the court found that extension of section 104 of the bihar and orissa municipal act, 1922 to the patna village by notification dt. 23-4-1951 without complying with the formalities imposed by sections 4, 5 and 6 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 16 2001 (HC)

M.V. Chalapathi Rao and Others Vs. State of A.P. and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(3)ALD3; 2001(3)ALT36

..... to from what date the continuance of the existing scales shouldbe treated as discriminatory or the continuance would loose its temporary character arising out of section 119 of the states reorganisation act. it may be that the state of karnataka felt that the grievance of the non-allotted primary school teachers whose salaries were lesser than the salaries of non-allotted secondary .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 04 2015 (HC)

Sonapala Balaraju and Others Vs. State of Telangana, rep. By its Princ ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... existence as 29th state of the union of india with effect from 02.06.2014. sections 28 and 29, sixth and seventh schedules of the andhra pradesh reorganisation act, 2014 deal with the amendment of the constitution (scheduled castes) order, 1950 and the constitution (scheduled tribes) order, 1950, including the list of scheduled ..... adapt laws before expiration of two years from the appointed day with required modifications. further, it is submitted that the law as defined under the a.p.reorganisation act includes ordinance, regulation, order, bye-law, rule, scheme, notification or other instrument having, immediately before the appointed day, the force of law in ..... (2 supra), the hon'ble supreme court has quashed the notification issued for inclusion of jat community in central list of backward classes for the states of bihar, gujarat, haryana, himachal pradesh, madhya pradesh, nct of delhi, bharatpur and dholpur districts of rajasthan, uttar pradesh and uttarakhand, mainly on the ground that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 1959 (HC)

Mukundas Proprietor, Krishna Cycle Stores, Secunderabad Vs. State of A ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1960AP298; [1960]11STC420(AP)

..... the telangana and andhra areas constituted the territory of the state andhra pradesh. the preservation of the pre-existing sales tax laws by reason of section 119 of the states reorganisation act has not the effect of constituting the movement of goods from one area of the state into another area an inter-state transaction. the territory of the state of andhra ..... laid down by the privy council in mayor of lyons v. east india co., 1 moo ind app 175 at pp. 270, 271)13. section 119 of the states reorganisation act makes a suitable provision for avoiding any biatus. the effect of that section is to declare that notwithstanding the emergence of the state of andhra pradesh and other states, there ..... states.15. the question then is as to what would constitute inter-state trade and commerce. in bengal immunity co. ltd. v. state of bihar, : [1955]2scr603 , venkatarama ayyar j., observed:''a sale could be in the course of inter-state trade only if two conditions occur: (1) a sale of goods, and (2) a .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //