Skip to content


Behind - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: behind Year: 1930 Page 1 of about 304 results (0.054 seconds)
Jan 29 1930 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Dinkar Nhanu Mangaonkar

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-29-1930

Reported in: (1930)32BOMLR344

..... jj will validity deceased was a very wealthy person he floated several companies he left behind his daughters s and j he was suffering from various diseases including some neurological ones .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 23 1930 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Ganpat Krishnaji Parit

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-23-1930

Reported in: AIR1930Bom167; (1930)32BOMLR351

..... jj will validity deceased was a very wealthy person he floated several companies he left behind his daughters s and j he was suffering from various diseases including some neurological ones .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 23 1930 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Babaji Manaji Patil

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-23-1930

Reported in: AIR1930Bom159; (1930)32BOMLR350

..... jj will validity deceased was a very wealthy person he floated several companies he left behind his daughters s and j he was suffering from various diseases including some neurological ones .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 27 1930 (PC)

Government of Bengal Vs. Santiram Mondal

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-27-1930

Reported in: AIR1930Cal370

..... shots were fired over the brick wall at the men standing behind the brick wall then comes the most important statement for the ..... there is no mention of the shooting on the maidan from behind the crowd and the indication is rather that the firing was ..... indiscriminately and there is no suggestion of the shooting from the maidan behind the crowd rather it is suggested from the statement that he .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 15 1930 (FN)

Powers-kennedy Corp. Vs. Concrete Mixing Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-15-1930

..... the compressed air admitted to page 282 u s 179 the chamber behind the mass was the propelling force was retained statements were added ..... offsets the next element to be considered is the introduction of air behind the mass in order to propel it into the discharge duct ..... incorrect and untenable this coincides with our own view the top pressure behind the mass and that coming through the pipe 10 is the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 11 1930 (PC)

Ramanathan Chetti and ors. Vs. Delhi Batcha Tevar Alias Udayana Tevar ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-11-1930

Reported in: (1931)60MLJ302

..... unreliable the gosha ladies are said by these witnesses to have been behind the purdah but p w 3 says that he was near the ..... without bending his head could not have seen anything that went on behind the curtain however that difficulty is got over by the witness as ..... and both of them being ladies of course were able to go behind the purdah the particulars endorsed on the mortgage bond are those required .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 11 1930 (PC)

Ramanathan Chetti and ors. Vs. Delhi Badaha Tevar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-11-1930

Reported in: AIR1931Mad335; 131Ind.Cas.840

..... unreliable the gosha ladies are said by these witnesses to have been behind the purdah but p w no 3 says that he was near ..... without bending his head could not have seen anything that went on behind the curtain however that difficulty is got over by the witness as ..... and both of them being ladies of course were able to go behind the purdah 10 the particulars endorsed on the mortgage bond are those .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 14 1930 (PC)

Kuda Koch Vs. Madan Gopal Agarwalla

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-14-1930

Reported in: 125Ind.Cas.739

..... of such share it appears that one golok koch died leaving behind him two sons srikanta and badan srikaata died leaving behind him kuda who is the plaintiff in the present litigation ..... badan died leaving behind nidhoo and mangloo his two sonsas his heirs nidhoo transferred his interest in the land .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 24 1930 (PC)

(Mahant) Shantha Nand Gir Chela and Mahant Gayanand Gir Vs. (Mahant) B ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jan-24-1930

Reported in: AIR1930All225

..... attachment merely because it considers that the motive object or intention behind it is improper to quote the words of a medieval judge ..... enquiry into the motives of the decree holder or his advocate behind the application in the kayastha co ltd v sita ram dubey ..... been asked to amend his application 135 the intention or object behind a plaint or application is not per se punishable by mulcting the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 24 1930 (PC)

Mahant Shanta Nand Gir Vs. Mahant Babudeva Nand Gir

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jan-24-1930

Reported in: 125Ind.Cas.477

..... attachment merely because it considers that the motive object or intention behind it is improper to quote the words of a medieval judge ..... enquiry into the motives of the decree holder or his advocate behind the application in kayastha co ltd v sita ram dubey air1929all625 ..... been asked to amend his application 96 the intention or object behind a plaint or application is not per se punishable by mulcting the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //