Behind - Year 1928 - Judgments

Dec 20 1928 (PC)

Ayyaswami Iyer Vs. Mahadeva Iyer and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-20-1928

Reported in: 119Ind.Cas.57

..... is only a reassurance of the constitutional right guaranteed under article 20 2 the principle behind this prescription under section 300 of cr p c is to avoid double jeopardy to ..... is only a reassurance of the constitutional right guaranteed under article 20 2 the principle behind this prescription under section 300 of cr p c is to avoid double jeopardy to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 12 1928 (PC)

Somu Iyer Vs. Chelliah Pillai and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-12-1928

Reported in: 119Ind.Cas.43

..... is only a reassurance of the constitutional right guaranteed under article 20 2 the principle behind this prescription under section 300 of cr p c is to avoid double jeopardy to ..... is only a reassurance of the constitutional right guaranteed under article 20 2 the principle behind this prescription under section 300 of cr p c is to avoid double jeopardy to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 14 1928 (PC)

Donepudi Subramannyam Vs. Nune Narasimham and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-14-1928

Reported in: 119Ind.Cas.46

..... is only a reassurance of the constitutional right guaranteed under article 20 2 the principle behind this prescription under section 300 of cr p c is to avoid double jeopardy to ..... is only a reassurance of the constitutional right guaranteed under article 20 2 the principle behind this prescription under section 300 of cr p c is to avoid double jeopardy to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 27 1928 (PC)

A.R.M. Karappan Chettiar and anr. Vs. Raja Kumara Venkata Perumal Raja ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-27-1928

Reported in: 116Ind.Cas.841

..... is only a reassurance of the constitutional right guaranteed under article 20 2 the principle behind this prescription under section 300 of cr p c is to avoid double jeopardy to ..... is only a reassurance of the constitutional right guaranteed under article 20 2 the principle behind this prescription under section 300 of cr p c is to avoid double jeopardy to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 13 1928 (PC)

Cherukuri Venkataratnam Vs. Bolla Guravayya and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-13-1928

Reported in: 121Ind.Cas.18

..... is only a reassurance of the constitutional right guaranteed under article 20 2 the principle behind this prescription under section 300 of cr p c is to avoid double jeopardy to ..... is only a reassurance of the constitutional right guaranteed under article 20 2 the principle behind this prescription under section 300 of cr p c is to avoid double jeopardy to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 11 1928 (PC)

K. Shanmugasundara Mudaliar and ors. Vs. S. Ratnavelu Mudaliar and ors ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-11-1928

Reported in: AIR1929Mad429; 121Ind.Cas.16

..... is only a reassurance of the constitutional right guaranteed under article 20 2 the principle behind this prescription under section 300 of cr p c is to avoid double jeopardy to ..... is only a reassurance of the constitutional right guaranteed under article 20 2 the principle behind this prescription under section 300 of cr p c is to avoid double jeopardy to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 16 1928 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Hanma Timma Bhandiwaddar

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-16-1928

Reported in: AIR1928Bom145(1); (1928)30BOMLR383

..... jj will validity deceased was a very wealthy person he floated several companies he left behind his daughters s and j he was suffering from various diseases including some neurological ones .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 16 1928 (PC)

Emperor Vs. HusseIn Gulam Nabi

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-16-1928

Reported in: (1928)30BOMLR373

..... jj will validity deceased was a very wealthy person he floated several companies he left behind his daughters s and j he was suffering from various diseases including some neurological ones .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 12 1928 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Merwanji M. Mistry

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-12-1928

Reported in: (1928)30BOMLR375

..... jj will validity deceased was a very wealthy person he floated several companies he left behind his daughters s and j he was suffering from various diseases including some neurological ones .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 12 1928 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Ambaji Dhakyaji Katkari

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-12-1928

Reported in: AIR1928Bom143; (1928)30BOMLR380

..... jj will validity deceased was a very wealthy person he floated several companies he left behind his daughters s and j he was suffering from various diseases including some neurological ones .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Behind - Judgment Search Results