Bare - Judgment Search Results

Barings Vs. Dabney

Court: US Supreme Court

Barings v. Dabney - 86 U.S. 1 (1873) U.S. Supreme Court Barings v. Dabney, 86 U.S. 19 Wall. 1 1 (1873) Barings v. Dabney 86 U.S. (19 Wall.) 1 ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH...

insurance Company Vs. Baring

Court: US Supreme Court

Insurance Company v. Baring - 87 U.S. 159 (1873) U.S. Supreme Court Insurance Company v. Baring, 87 U.S. 20 Wall. 159 159 (1873) Insurance Company v. Baring 87 U.S. (20 Wall.) 159 ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT...

Rae Bareli Kshetriya GramIn Bank Vs. Bhola Nath Singh and Other

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1997SC1908; 1997(2)CTC31; JT1997(3)SC717; (1999)ILLJ947SC; 1997(3)SCALE86; (1997)3SCC657; [1997]2SCR588

1. Leave granted. We have heard learned Counsel on both sides. 2. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the single Judge of the Allahabad High Court, made on April 19, 1996 in...

Prakash Bare vs M/S Leizure Ville Owners : Association

Court: Kerala

MAGHA, 1944 OP(C) NO. 204 OF 2023 OS 930/2022 OF III ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM(RENT CONTROL) PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF: PRAKASH BARE AGED 57 YEARS S/O LATE BARE SHANKARANARAYANA HOLLA, RESIDING AT 'VISHNUKRIPA', BARE VILLAGE, UDUMA, KASARGODE, KERALA, PIN -

Anil Yadav @ Bare Yadav and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar

Court: Patna

Matched in: Parties Anil Yadav @ Bare Yadav and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar

“a Bare Reading of the Rule Makes It Clear That the Vs. Rajinder Kum ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

of Haryana & others versus Sh. Mulkh Raj Mehta (supra) wherein it has been observed as under:- “A bare reading of the Rule makes it clear that the employee is entitled to add the actual period not

Lg, Andaman and Nicobar Islands and Others Vs. Ms. Bare Foot Inns and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Matched in: Parties Lg, Andaman and Nicobar Islands and Others Vs. Ms. Bare Foot Inns and Leisure Pvt. Ltd.

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Bare Lal and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: II(1998)ACC392; 1998ACJ248

the appellant insurance company against the award dated 12.1.1996 of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Umaria, Distt. Shahdol.2. Bare facts necessary for decision of this appeal are as follows: The deceased Raju aged 16 years who was

Chiranji Lal Vs. Sri Thakur Bare Madan Mohan Lalji and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1936All186

a will, under which he dedicated 20 Biswa-Zamindari in village Lalpur to an idol known as 'Sri Thakur Bare Madan Mohan Lalji Maharaj' situate in Bengali Ghat, Muttra. The plaintiffs in the case are Sri Thakur Bare

The Oriental Bank Corporation Vs. the Baree Tea Company, Limited

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1883)ILR9Cal880

the Company.'4. The bills in question were drawn by Nicholls & Co., upon the Managing Agents of the Baree Tea Company; they were accepted by Nicholls & Co., under the description 'Managing Agents of the Baree Tea