Bale - Judgment Search Results

Wright Vs. Bales

Court: US Supreme Court

Wright v. Bales - 67 U.S. 535 (1862) U.S. Supreme Court Wright v.

Sk. Bale S/O Fateh Mohammad Vs. HafizoddIn S/O Dadubhai and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1982(1)BomCR545

C.S. Dharmadhikari, J.1. The petitioner Shaikh Bale son of Fateh Mohammad filed a complaint against 16 persons

Bale Ram vs.lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors

Court: Delhi

to the present proceedings, that while the petitioner i.e. Sh. Bale Ram of Mahamna W.P. (C) 2178/2016 Page 10 of 19

Shiva Jute Baling Limited Vs. Hindley and Company Limited

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1959SC1357; [1960]1SCR569

made under this contract. 2. On June 23, 1947, thirty-nine bales of jute were consigned by the appellant to Rio de

Sh. Bale Ram S/O Late Sh. Bansi Ram Vs. Land Acquisition Collector

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2005(83)DRJ179

ORDERReference U/s 18 of the L.A. Act made By Shri Bale Ram S/o Shri Bansi Ram resident of Vill-Usmanpur, Delhi, against

Bales Sardara Paracha Vs. the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2005(3)ALLMR218; 2005(4)BomCR577

Ranjana Desai, J.1. The appellant ('the plaintiff ', for convenience) has challenged in this appeal Judgment and Order dated 5th...

Shaikh Bale Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1971AP302

ORDER1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus or...

Shiva Jute Baling Ltd. Vs. Hindley and Co. Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1955SC464; [1955]2SCR243

Mukherjea, C.J.1. This is an application by the respondents in Special Leave Petition No. 230 of 1953, praying for summons...

Sudhir Bale Vs. Bilal Rai and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1984(7)DRJ140; 1984RLR541

D.R. Khanna, J.(1) In a matrimonial matter where sensitivities of the parties are deeply involved, every attempt should be made...

Premananda S.X. Verencar and ors. Vs. Vilas Nakul Bale and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1991(1)BomCR244

Sharad Manohar, J.1. The point raised in this Revision Application stems from the desire to indulge in technicalities.2. The plaintiff,...