B V There - Judgment Search Results

B.V. Srinivasan Vs. B.V. Tulasiraman

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2001)1MLJ702

in T.S.1865 and T.S.1864, Sivarayar Garden III Street, M. Chavadi, Thanjavur. The suit is related to the properties viz. A2 schedule property which was obtained by the father of the plaintiff and first defendant and B schedule … in the suit properties. The case of the plaintiff is as follows: The first defendant is the elder brother of the plaintiff. The genealogy of the family is as follows: Subbiah BhagavatharVenkatachalapathy Krishnasamy Chakrapani (heirs not mentioned)

B.V. Satyanarayana Varaprasad Rao Vs. B.V. Bhashyakarulu Rao

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1924Mad399

ORDER1. This is an application for leave to appeal to the Privy Council, against an order passed by one of as, sitting as a single Judge, under Section 116 of the Civil Procedure Code and Section … to see bow the petitioner can escape the obstacle placed in his way by this section. His learned Vakil says, however, that under Section 39 of the Letters Patent a right of appeal is given in all

Smt. Sarojamma W/O Late B.V.S. Narayana Setty Represented HereIn by Po ...

Court: Karnataka

read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure is filed. Execution of the compromise petition is admitted by the parties before the Court.2. The compromise petition reads as under:1) The above appeal is filed challenging the … her share and also towards the share of mother, the deceased Appellant No. 1 - Smt. Sarojamma, in view of the fact the Appellant No. 1 - Smt. Sarojamma died on 12.11.2008 leaving behind a registered will,

B V Seshaiah Vs. The State Of Telangana

Court: Supreme Court of India

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.OF2023(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL) NO.7099/2018) B V SESHAIAH ... APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF TELANGANA & ANR. ... RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.OF2023(Arising out of

Olx India B.v. Vs. The State Of Haryana

Court: Supreme Court of India

OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.378 OF2022(Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No.328 of 2022) OLX INDIA B.V. …Appellant VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. …Respondents ORDER1 Leave granted.2. This appeal challenges the order dated 13.12.2021

B.V. Ram Kumar versus State of Telangana and Another

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2025]3S.C.R.48

[2025] 3 S.C.R. 48 : 2025 INSC 194 B.V. Ram Kumar v. State of Telangana and Another (Criminal Appeal No. 654 of 2025) 10 February 2025 [Sanjay

B.V. Smitha Rani Vs. M.K. Girish

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2009(13)SCALE94

granted.2. Heard learned Counsel for the appellant.3. In spite of service of notice, nobody has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent to contest the prayer made in this appeal.4. The parties were married on 28.5.2003. After … for evidence of the respondent on 28.9.2006. At that stage, the respondent applied for recording his evidence by video conferencing. The Family Court rejected his prayer and the special leave petition filed by him was dismissed by

Apm Terminals B.V. Vs Union of India and anr ,

Court: Supreme Court of India

1. Leave granted in SLP(C)No.13893 of 2010, which is being heard along with Transferred Case (Civil) Nos.36-37 of 2010. While the appeal has been filed by APM Terminals … SLP(C)No.13893 of 2010, out of which the present appeal arises.2. In the appeal, the appellant has challenged the validity and propriety of the decision taken by the Board of Trustees of the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, hereinafter

D.H.B.V.N.L Vidyut Nagar, Hisar and ors. Vs. Yashvir Singh Gulia

Court: Supreme Court of India

Radhakrishnan, J.Leave granted.2. The question that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether once a charge-sheet has been issued for imposition of a major penalty under Regulation 7 of the Haryana State Electricity Board Employees (Punishment … OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.6150 OF 201.[Arising out of SLP (C) No.5230 of 2013]. D.H.B.V.N.L. Vidyut Nagar, Hisar & Others .. Appellants Versus Yashvir Singh Gulia .. Respondent JUDGMENT K. S. Radhakrishnan, J.Leave granted.2.

B.V. Radha Krishna Vs. Sponge Iron India Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1997SC1324; JT1997(3)SC327; 1997(2)SCALE469; (1997)4SCC693; [1997]2SCR707; 1997(1)LC661(SC)

question that arises for our consideration is whether the High Court was justified in interfering with the award by reducing the amount for the work done as well as allowing the interest only from the date of … ORDERK. Venkataswami, J.1. Leave granted.2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. The short question that arises for our consideration is