Asset - Judgment Search Results

JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Mahar ...

Court: Mumbai

in Section 35 that the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 will prevail over

international Asset Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Mumbai

institutions to realize long term assets, manage problems of liquidity, asset liability mismatch and to improve recovery of debts by exercising

Asset Reconstruction Company Vs. Kumar Metallurgical Corporation

Court: DRAT Madras

Reported in: IV(2005)BC117

of taking action under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, if no such

Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited Rep. by Its Vice Presiden ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2006]134CompCas267(Mad); 2006(3)CTC529; (2006)2MLJ822; [2006]72SCL18(Mad)

Act, 1956, may retain the sale proceeds of his secured assets after depositing the workmen's dues with the liquidator in accordance

JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Board of T ...

Court: Mumbai

different fields. While the SARFAESI Act is concerned with nonperforming assets of the banks, the Rent Control Act governed the relationship

Pegasus Assets Reconstruction P.Ltd. Vs. M/S Haryana Concast Limited a ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

appellant shall be facing similar fetters in case the secured assets happen to be of a company under winding up. Learned

Asset. Reconstruction Company Vs. Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd. and anr ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR2008MP79

third party:3) In case if possession of any of the assets whether movable or immovable of the respondent company is taken

Asset Reconstruction Company Vs. Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd. and anr.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: (2008)1CompLJ306(MP); 2007(4)MPLJ560

negotiating, selling encumbering or parting away of any of the assets whether movable or immovable property standing in the name of

Pegasus Asset Reconstruction P. Ltd. Vs. Haryana Concast Ltd.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: [2009]152CompCas215(P& H)

and this was a definite safeguard against any under-valuation of assets, protection for the general body of creditors and the workmen

Asset Reconstuction Company (india) Limited Vs. Tulip Star Hotels Limi ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

not be in possession of the corporate debtor; (iii) tangible assets, whether movable or immovable; (iv) intangible assets including intellectual property;