Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 173 communication of certain orders to prison officers Page 53 of about 523 results (0.097 seconds)

Vijayakumar B. Jiragyal Vs. Chief of the Army Staff and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2005(3)KarLJ550

..... mr. visweshwara, learned senior counsel, let me see as to whether the order requires my interference in the given circumstances.9. army act of 1950 is an act to consolidate and amend the law relating to the government of the regular army. section 40 provides for punishment of imprisonment of a term which my extend to 14 years in the event of a person committing ..... on the head of captain rajesh masurkar. a charge-sheet was issued to him. he was charged for using criminal force to his superior in terms of section 40(a) of the army act.1.1 he was punished with the sentence of ri for 28 days with effect from 21-4-1998 to 18-5-1998. on 25-5-1998. ..... an offence of using criminal force to or assaults a superior officer, in the case on hand petitioner is charged under section 40 .....

Subodh Shukla Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(5)MPHT299

..... irregularities and illegalities committed by his commanding officer and one major r.s. dudee. on receiving no response thereon he filed another statutory compliant under section 27 of the army act, 1950 again bringing to the notice of the higher authorities the illegalities committed by his commanding officer col. devinder yadav and major r.s. dudee. on ..... petitioner's defence was considered. the opinion of the deputy judge, advocate general branch was also obtained and on that basis a summary trial under section 84 of the army act and rule 26 was held against the petitioner and thereafter the impugned order dated 1-10-2003 was passed imposing a punishment of loss of ..... of incident have elapsed a fresh trial against the petitioner is also not permissible in view of the provisions of section 122 of the army act and, therefore, at this stage there is no provision in the army act or rules which could permit recording of the statements of the defence witnesses in the summary of evidence afresh .....

Capt. Paramjeet Singh and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1992(1)WLC37; 1991(2)WLN198

..... delegation in favour of mr. r.k. sharma nor could it have been given in the absence of any provision to that effect under section 109 of the army act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'). the second submission of mr. garg, is that the tentative charge sheet served on the petitioner and final charges levelled against the petitioner are ..... have categorically held that the court will not investigate into the merits of the g.c.m. proceedings because remedy is available to the aggrieved person under section 164 of the army act. in the second case it has specifically been held that if any finding is recorded by gcm against the petitioners, they can challenge the finding before ..... his approval.5. mr. c.k.garg. learned counsel for the petitioner has raised several arguments in support of the petition. mr. garg has submitted that section 109 of the army act has been flouted inasmuch as the order for convening of g.c.m. has not been issued by a competent authority. the order has been signed by .....

Union of India Through Its Secretary, Ministry of Defense South Block, ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2002VIAD(Delhi)619; 97(2002)DLT796; 2002(64)DRJ347

..... , 1941 to 22nd march, 1945 can be counted as on active service, the learned single judge examined the various provisions of the indian army act, 1911 as well as the pension regulations for the army. it was concluded that the deceased could not have been deprived of the benefits of service rendered between december, 1941 and march, 1945. ..... he was given medical treatment and examined by the medical board on 5th february, 1953. on the recommendations of the medical board, the deceased was discharged from the army on 17th june, 1953. it was opined by the medical board that he was suffering from toxic psychosis (following malaria mt) and his disability was assessed at 40 ..... 1941. he remained in temporary service till 21st march, 1945. he was re-enrolled as a combatant hawaldar storeman under the combatization scheme and continued to serve in the army till his discharge on 17th june, 1953.4. it appears that during 1953 the deceased was stationed in jammu & kashmir and thereafter posted to c.o.d. .....

V.G. Pillai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... (46 of 1950), the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the air force act, 1950 (45 of 1950), and any other law ..... section 80 of the act. in support of his aforesaid contention he referred to para 18 of the case of mahipal singh (supra). section 475 of cr.p.c. and rule 3 of the criminal courts and border security force courts (adjustment of jurisdiction) rules, 1969 are reproduced below:475 (1) the central government may make rules consistent with this code and the army act, 1950 .....

V.C. Rajan and anr. Vs. the Presiding Officer of General Court Martial ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(6)ALD56; 2003(1)ALT527

..... .1987. by order dated 18.3.1991 a division bench of this court directed the appellants herein to avail statutory remedy of appeal as provided under section 164(2) of army act. this court directed the respondents to supply to the appellants the entire record of proceedings held at the court martial conducted against the appellants including the ..... and also rigorous imprisonment for one year. the general officer, commanding-in-chief, southern command and army headquarters, pune, confirmed the findings and sentence given by the general court martial on 16.3.1987 under section 154 of the army act. thereupon both the appellants filed separately two writ petitions in w.p.nos.6018 of 1987 and ..... appeal against the order dated 30.08.1995 of the learned single judge dismissing the writ petition.2. both the appellants were prosecuted under the provisions of the army act on two counts. the first count is that on 25.6.1985 the two appellants committed theft of 400 liters of petrol worth rs.2904=00. the .....

Bachan Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008(5)ALLMR(SC)992; 2008(3)JKJ5[SC]; JT2008(13)SC605; (2008)6MLJ684(SC); 2008(10)SCALE184; (2008)9SCC161; 2009(1)SLJ496(SC); 2008AIRSCW6518

order for the assembly of ageneral court martial under army act orders by ic-5095p major general k. mahipat sinhji officiating general officer commanding 16 corps. place: field date:15 december, 1981.no. 3973649a sepoy the details of officers mentionedbachan singh ..... ad-jutant general forofficiating general officer commanding16 corpsthe charge sheet reads as under:charge sheet the accused no. 3973649a sep bachan singh, 2nd batallion the dogra regiment is charged with:army act an act prejudicial to good

Watson and anr. Vs. Lloyd

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1902)ILR25Mad402

..... that it was not the intention of the legislature by adding the words 'or by any law passed by the governor-general of india in council' to section 136 of the army act to make section 266 of the code of civil procedure applicable to a military officer.8. in considering the construction to be placed upon these words it is important to bear ..... appeal from an order of boddam, j., dismissing an application for the attachment of a moiety of the pay of a major in the indian staff corps.2. the army act of 1881, section 151 (3) provided: 'a civil court or court of small causes, upon adjudging payment of any sum by any person subject to military law other than a soldier ..... soldier of his majesty's regular forces shall be paid without any deduction other than the deductions authorized by this or any other act or by any royal warrant for the time being.'4. in 1895, section 151 of the army act of 1881 was repealed and the words 'or by any law passed by the governor-general of india in council' were added .....

Major General Inder Jit Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT1997(4)SC8; 1997(3)SCALE111; (1997)9SCC1

..... has proceeded to a conclusion and a sentence has been passed that he be cashiered from service which is subject to confirmation as per the provisions of the army act, 1950. the appellant has filed additional grounds of appeal before us challenging these findings. an earlier writ petition being misc. petition 717 of 1991 which was filed before ..... the alternative. the tentative charges which were framed on or about 28.10.1989 were twelve in number. each charge was under section 52 of the army act and in the alternative, under section 63 of the army act. section 52(b) refers to the offence of dishonestly misappropriating or converting to one's own use of any property belonging, inter alia, ..... he was posted at agra.13. the appellant next contends that the convening of the general court martial in his case is not valid because under section 109 of the army act a general court martial can be convened only by any officer who has been appointed by a specific warrant in that connection by the chief of .....

Naga People's Movement of Human Rights Vs. Union of India (UOi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1998SC465; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)220; JT1997(9)SC431; 1997(7)SCALE741; (1998)2SCC109; [1997]Supp5SCR469

..... should be taken of violation of the instructions and the persons found responsible for such violation should be suitably punished under the army act, 1950.64. while considering the submissions assailing the validity of clauses (a) to (d) of section 4 and section 5, we have construed the said provisions as containing certain safeguards against arbitrary exercise of power. in this context, reference may also ..... these instructions provide an effective check against any misuse or abuse of the powers conferred under the central act on an officer in the armed forces inasmuch as contravention of these instructions is punishable under sections 41, 42(e), 63 and 64(f) of the army act, 1950.61. in state of uttar pradesh v. chandra mohan nigam and ors. : (1978)illj6sc , this court, while .....