Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 173 communication of certain orders to prison officers Page 49 of about 523 results (0.098 seconds)

Ajai Kumar Roy Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003CriLJ3999

..... on 17-11-2002 and approached the respondents 2 and 3 for permission to meet the detenu, but he was not allowed to see him. under section 101(1) of the army act, 1950 ('the act' for brevity) it is the duty of the officer taking a person into military custody to inform the detenu of the grounds of arrest in writing ..... does not arise.8. in order to set at rest the issue in controversy, we would like to refer to section 101(1) of the army act, 1950 which reads as follows :101. custody of offenders :-- 1) any person subject to this act who is . charged with an offence may be taken in to military custody;2) any such person may be ..... arrest.2) where any person arrested shows symptoms of sickness, medical assistance shall be provided for such person. 12. section 50 of the army act, 1950 reads as follows :50. irregularity in connection with arrest or confinement.-- any person subject to this act who commits any of the following offences, that is to say,-- a) unnecessarily detain a person in arrest or .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. S.P.S. Rajkumar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2007(6)SC278; 2007(6)SCALE124; (2007)6SCC407

..... 4.2000, this court in union of india and anr. v. charanjit s. gill and ors. : air2000sc3425 interpreted certain provisions of the army act, 1950 (in short the 'act') and the army rules, 1954 (in short the 'army rules') holding that the judge advocate should be equal or superior to the rank of the accused officer just like the rules provided for the ..... by doctrine of necessity the concerned judge advocate was the only available officer. 5. the respondent-rajkumar filed post confirmation petition under section 161(2) of the air force act, 1950 (in short the 'air force act') on 30.1.2000 and the same was rejected by the central government on 24.9.2001. by judgment dated 5.8.2002 ..... of seniority of the judge advocate. it is submitted that the provisions in the army act and under the army rules are entirely different from air force act and air force rules. it is pointed out that any rule similar to rules 103/104 of the army rules did not exist in the air force rules. the gcm proceedings were over. .....

Shri Shantilal Nagarwal, Ex. Mcelar Second Class Vs. Union of India (U ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR3069

..... confused for reasons. he submitted that the apex court had specifically considered the question of requirement to give reasons in the context of analogous provisions of the army act and the army rules in s. n. mukherjee v. union of india reported at (1990) s.c.c. 594. it may be useful to quote observations of ..... him to the rank of petty officer and depriving him of three good conduct badges. petitioner sought judicial review by the commander in chief under section 160 of the navy act, who reduced the sentence as indicated above by his impugned order. aggrieved thereby, petitioner is before this court.6. we have heard the learned ..... district courts martial; ( c ) summary general courts martial and (d) summary courts martial. the procedure of court martial is prescribed in chapter xi (sections 128 to 152) of the act. section 129 prescribes that every general court martial shall, and every district or summary general court martial may, be attended by a judge-advocate, who shall be either .....

Gajaji Gopalji Jadeja Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2005)2GLR1142

..... provides living wage etc. for workers. article 46 provides promotion of educational and economic interests of scheduled castes, scheduled tribes and other weaker sections.9. relying on the scheme of the act and the judgement of the hon'ble supreme court, the learned counsel for the petitioners has made the following submissions:9.1 the petitioners ..... of the state of gujarat. it was further submitted that the petitioners cannot pretend that their nature of duty is just like that of bsf and other army personnel.10.8c the learned counsel further submitted that the petitioners are not the members of 'paramilitary force', as per ex-servicemen (re-employment in central ..... the nature and the kinds of duties performed by the border wing home guards in relation to the borders and border areas and the method of working under army or border security force, etc. (the letters are addressed by battalion commandant to company commandant).f. the border wing home guards has been described as paramilitary .....

Akhil G Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court : Kerala

..... whatsoever, but shall not include matters relating to- (i) orders issued under section 18 of the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950), sub-section (1) of section 15 of the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and section 18 of the air force act, 1950 (45 of 1950); and (ii) transfers and posting including the change of place or unit on ..... ship in relation to the persons subject to the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the air force act, 1950, (45 of 1950 ..... supplied) service matters referred to in section 14 is defined in section 3(o) as follows: 3. (o) service matters, in relation to the persons subject to the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the air force act, 1950 (45 of 1950), meal all matters relating to the conditions .....

Kulwant Singh (Nk.) S/O Sardar Sadhu Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1991(0)MPLJ985

..... challenging conviction and sentences of the petitioners in court martial proceedings for alleged offences said to have been committed by them under sections 37(c), 38(1) and 63 of the army act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act').4. in the sikh regiment centre at ramgarh on 10-6-1984 soldiers waged a mutiny and looted the arms in ..... 4) no. 3381905 sepoy hakum singh all of the sikh regimental centre, attached with adm. bn. the jammu and kashmir rifles regimental centre are charged with :first charge army act, section 37(c) against all accused persons being present at a mutiny in the military forces of india, not using their utmost endeavours to suppress the same, in that they ..... battalion kotes. the cause of mutiny in the sikh regiment was said to be the entry of the indian army in the precinct of the golden .....

Sarat Kumar Malu Vs. State of Orissa and anr.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1992Ori128

..... court also referred to the case of ram sarup v. union of india, air 1965 sc 247, where the vires of section 125 of the army act which authorised the officer either to try a case by court-martial or by an ordinary court or by a criminal court, was challenged on the ground that the ..... j.1. in this writ application under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india, the petitioner seeks a declaration that section 56(2) and section 56(2-a) of the orissa forest act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') are ultra vires article 14 of the constitution of india, by reason of vesting of unbriddled, uncanalised, unregulated powers in forest ..... modes prescribed being clearly within the discretion of the authority without any guidelines the section was violative of article 14 of the constitution. the supreme court held that .....

Manju Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(1)ESC224; [2005(104)FLR773]; (2005)1UPLBEC435

..... chief of the army staff has, after taking into consideration the other factors come-to the conclusion that the retention of that ..... was tried by the court-marshal but, upon the confirmation, as provided in the army act and rules, the confirming authority came to the conclusion that there was some technical flaw, therefore, the court-marshal proceeding was dropped in view of section 121 of the army act, which clearly goes to show that second trial is not permissible, therefore, in view of the fact the .....

Union of India (Uoi) Through Major General H.C. Pathak Vs. Major S.K. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1987SC1878; 1987CriLJ1912; JT1987(3)SC12; 1987(2)SCALE12; (1987)3SCC490; [1987]3SCR456; 1987(2)LC362(SC)

..... judicial magistrate against col. ali should, in his opinion, be disposed of under the procedure laid down in army rule 22 of army rules, 1954 and that under section 125 of the army act 1950 read with army rule 197a of the army rules and the criminal court and court martial (adjustment of jurisdiction) rules 1978, major general chaudhri was ..... court martial or other effectual proceedings have been taken against him.12. our attention has been drawn by learned counsel for the appellants to section 125 of the army act. section 125 provides that when a criminal court and a court martial have each jurisdiction in respect of an offence it will be in the discretion ..... establishment v. lt. col. s.k. loraiya, : 1973crilj33 . he directed that the case be transferred to the army authorities pursuant to the requisitions, and for disposal in accordance with the provisions of the army act, 1950 after trial by a court-martial at any place within the jurisdiction of his court, he directed further that the .....

Capt. Harish Uppal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC258; (1973)3SCC319; [1973]2SCR1025

..... officer, who indulges in such an offence, should, therefore, be awarded suitable punishment. in the course of six years commissioned service he had once been convicted under army act section 41(2) for disobeying a lawful command given by his superior officer in the execution of his duties for which he was severely reprimanded on 13 june 1970. 6 ..... the sentence, then the fresh sentence should be announced in open court as being subject to confirmation. 7. the attention of the court is, drawn to army act section 160, army rule 68 and the form of proceedings on revision given on page 370 of n1ml (1961 reprint), which should be amended to conform to the provisions of ..... this is perhaps the one contention with the least substance put forward on behalf of the petitioner. the contention is based on the words found in section 157 of the army act that the findings and sentences of summary general courts-martial may be confirmed by the convening officer or if he so directs, by an authority superior to .....