Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 170 temporary custody of offender Court: karnataka Page 11 of about 261 results (0.114 seconds)

Sri Ziaullakhan Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... corporation established by or under any law of the state legislature, including a co- operative society, or a government company within the meaning of section 617 of the companies act, 1956 and such other corporations or boards as the state government may, having regard to its financial interest in such corporations or boards, by ..... as task force commander/assistant engineer on consolidated pay/daily wage and his services were regularised with effect from 05.05.1988 by the then karnataka land army corporation limited which was constituted in the year 1974. the said corporation was renamed in the year 2009 as kridl. the petitioner was promoted as assistant ..... 06.2011, the general manager (md), issued direction to the executive officer, taluka panchayat, hagaribommanahalli to entrust the construction of low cost houses through the karnataka land army corporation limited, now called as kridl. copy of the letter dated 16.06.2011 addressed by the general manager (md), rgrhcl is at annexure c . (d .....

Capt Chethan Y K (retd) Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

..... iii of the constitution of india nor violation of any other constitutional provisions and the union of india is certainly competent to issue notification keeping in view section 41 of the arms act, 1959.76. the apex court in the case of public services tribunal bar association v. state of uttar pradesh, reported in (2003) 4 scc104while ..... 5. the provisions of article 14 of the constitution have come up for discussion before this court in a number of cases, namely, chiranjit lal chowdhuri v. union of india [(1950) 1 scr869 , state of bombay v. f.n. balsara [(1951) 2 scr682 , state of west bengal v. anwar ali sarkar [(1952) 3 scr284 , kathi raning ..... army/police personnel exempted from licence in form iii in respect of certain 5 0 - 50 - arms and ammunition and subject to certain terms and conditions. 15 g.s.r. 20.11.1978 acquisition, possession or 1414 carrying of certain arms, other than fire-arms by tourists within certain areas of rajasthan from the operation of section 4 of the arms act .....

C. Munichowdappa Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1984KAR858; 1985(1)KarLJ110; (1985)ILLJ356Kant

..... or dismissal as the circumstances of the case may require. for this purpose, a new s. 11-a is proposed to be inserted in the industrial disputes act, 1947.' section 11-a read thus : '11-a. powers of labour courts, tribunals and national tribunals to give appropriate relief in case of discharge or dismissal of workmen ..... do not add to the principles.' 7. two reasons given by the state government in annexure 'h' are - (1) the workman has produced a false army certificate for getting an appointment and (2) his services are terminated after conducing regular enquiry and found guilty of charges framed against him. 8. sri subba rao ..... i am directed to state that government consider that the dispute in question does not merit reference for adjudication for the reason that the workman has produced false army certificate for getting the appointment, and the services were terminated after conducting regular enquiry and found guilty of charges framed against him. yours faithfully, sd/- (neelakanta .....

Ex. Naik Raja C. Vs. Oic Signals Records and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR3074

..... both temporary and permanent) due to psychological cause, misconduct or self inflicted injuries will not be eligible for promotion.(c)... .... .....8. a reading of the said section would show that the personnel placed in medical category 'bee' would be eligible for promotion to the next higher rank. this would include both temporary and permanent low ..... because of the reason that they were not having the papers relating to the court of enquiry proceeding including the injury casualty report, since under the army rules, 1954, records will not be preserved for more than three years. they also say that 28 infantry division signals regiment did not implement the ..... 1999 stating that it was not in a position to implement the promotion order. thereafter, petitioner states that co.28 infantry division signals regiment has not acted to regularise the omission to publish the injury report casualty. based on the demand of the medical authorities, 28 infantry division signals regiment held the c .....

The Union Of India Vs. Bangalore North Taluk Public Greivances Committ ...

Court : Karnataka

..... utmost confidence warrants invariable exclusion of third parties into the defence areas. 5374. the normal rule of entitlement is, easement of necessity under section 13 of easements act, is available whenever alternative access, however inconvenient may be is not at the availability. whether pleadings or the evidence be it oral or ..... totally stand at a different footing compared to sensitive and confidential organization relating to space research organization, atomic research organization, defence 56 establishment whether of army, navy or air force. the circumstances of prevention of interference changes rapidly from time to time and place to place. the degree of apprehension of ..... rangers, grass farms, dairy farms, brick fields, soldiers and hospital gardens as provided for in paragraphs 419, 421 and 425 of the regulations for the army in india and other official requirements of the military authorities". (ii) class a(2) land which is actually used or occupied by the military authorities, .....

Sena Vihar Owners Welfare Association (r) Vs. Sri. Bandarappa Bhakthad ...

Court : Karnataka

..... same, plaintiff preferred first appeal before the high court. the court after hearing both side and considering few judgments of hon'ble apex court and also section 110 of the evidence act, was pleased to observe in paragraph no.56 of its judgment as below:"56. here, even if ancestors of plaintiff as shebait are managing the temple ..... contention of the plaintiffs that awho was formed with the aim and objectives of procuring, developing and providing dwelling units, flats, plots etc., to serving retired personnel of army and other defence sectors who are its member registrants, is also not disputed by the defendants. it is also not in dispute that, at the request of awho, ..... every defence sector who are 4 r.f.a.no.23 of 2017 its member registrants. in pursuance of its aims and objectives awho framed army welfare housing organisation rules, 1987. in furtherance of its objectives, the awho approached bengaluru development authority (hereinafter for brevity referred to as bda ) for allotment of .....

Sanjay M Peerapur S/o Mallappa Peerapur Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... prescribed for the employees of the indian military nursing service.38. in ram sarup supra, the apex court has taken a view that every provision under the army act is a law coming under article 33 of the constitution of india. the said judgment has no application as ordinance, 1943 is not a law made by ..... provisions to achieve the goal set out in article 14.11. segregation of unequal to provide permissible protection or accommodation or to confer some advantage to the marginalised section of society is not only desirable but also a constitutional imperative. however, such an obligation has certain limitations. the classification must pass the well-established twin test. ..... effect of the ordinance passed before the independence. the said judgment has no application to the present petition as the petitioners admit that the ordinance was adapted in 1950 as provided under article 372 (2) of the constitution of india.37. much emphasis is laid on the judgment of the apex court in jasbir kaur vs. .....

M/s Chalet Hotels Limited Vs. M/s Hindustan Aeronautics Limited

Court : Karnataka

..... proposed construction. it was also clarified that the petitioner could be called upon to demolish the structure in whole or part pursuant to the provisions of section 9-a of the act, or any other notifications issued pursuant to the same.19. it is the further contention of the 1st respondent that during august-september 2012, ..... of the said structure can be directed to demolish the building so as to conform to the stipulated height. in pursuance of the provisions of section 9-a of the act, the central government has issued a gazette notification dated 14.1.2010 regulating the constructions in and around different aerodromes. admittedly the hal aerodrome is ..... .84(e) dated 14.01.2010 issued by the ministry of civil aviation, government of india, in exercise of powers conferred under the provisions of section 9a of the aircraft act, 1934, to regulate construction for the safety of aircraft operations. prior to the said notification, similar notification relating to hal were 14 issued by the .....

Ex. Naik, M.S. Pemmaiah Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1998KAR151

..... of petitioner's claim for disability pension is arbitrary, capricious, untenable and contrary to the provisions of the pension entitlement rules appended to the pension regulations (army) 1961 and further submits that the appellate authority without proper application of mind has mechanically rejected the appeal of the petitioner and therefore the orders are ..... at least casual connection must be established between disability and military service, para 423(c) of the regulations for the medical services of the armed forces act, regulation 173 of the pension regulations and rule 7(b) of appendix ii to pension regulations given an indication how to approach this problem.9. before ..... pension? to answer this precise question, provisions which require to be noticed are para 423(c) of the regulations of the medical services of armed forces act, regulations 173 of the pensions regulations and rule 7(b) of appendix ii to pension regulation.13. relevant clause of para 423 of the regulations reads .....

Brigadier M.S. Oberoi Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1994KAR3313; 1994(5)KarLJ49

..... senior officer of the armed forces and he has through the present petition assailed the correctness of the order passed by the central government under section 19 of the army act on 23-4-1991 compulsorily retiring him from service. the order proceeds on the footing that the petitioner is alleged to have been guilty of ..... certain acts which in the opinion of the army authorities and the central government constituted serious misconduct which justified a direction to him to resign from service. the petitioner at that point of ..... they could come to the conclusion that the charges of serious misconduct stood proved and that the gravity of misconduct was serious enough to remove a senior army officer from service. to my mind, the conclusions were also completely unjustified insofar as the accusations even if taken as proved would at the highest amount .....