Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 170 temporary custody of offender Court: karnataka Page 13 of about 261 results (0.154 seconds)

Dr Sharanya Mohan Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... same being exercised by the centre under clause 3 of the sugar and gur (control) order, 1950, issued by it in exercise of the powers conferred under section 3 of act 24 of 1946. the prices fixed by the centre were adopted by the state government and the only thing which the state government required under ..... the thirteenth amendment of the us constitution, which prohibits involuntary servitude; the court reasoned that every individual owed certain duties to the state, such as services in the army, militia, the jury, etc., and that the amendment did not intend to bar the enforcement of those duties. (iv) the provisions relating to fundamental rights guaranteed ..... scc366 ,. (ii) the colonial rulers introduced western system of medicine in the country largely to cater to the needs of their settlers, servicemen and sepoys in the army; while the elite india had the options of availing the benefits of western medicine, the indian masses were left to be served by the indigenous system; the vast .....

Dr Shivani Ramachandran Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

..... same being exercised by the centre under clause 3 of the sugar and gur (control) order, 1950, issued by it in exercise of the powers conferred under section 3 of act 24 of 1946. the prices fixed by the centre were adopted by the state government and the only thing which the state government required under ..... the thirteenth amendment of the us constitution, which prohibits involuntary servitude; the court reasoned that every individual owed certain duties to the state, such as services in the army, militia, the jury, etc., and that the amendment did not intend to bar the enforcement of those duties. (iv) the provisions relating to fundamental rights guaranteed ..... scc366 ,. (ii) the colonial rulers introduced western system of medicine in the country largely to cater to the needs of their settlers, servicemen and sepoys in the army; while the elite india had the options of availing the benefits of western medicine, the indian masses were left to be served by the indigenous system; the vast .....

Mr Tanay Appachu Shastry Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... same being exercised by the centre under clause 3 of the sugar and gur (control) order, 1950, issued by it in exercise of the powers conferred under section 3 of act 24 of 1946. the prices fixed by the centre were adopted by the state government and the only thing which the state government required under ..... the thirteenth amendment of the us constitution, which prohibits involuntary servitude; the court reasoned that every individual owed certain duties to the state, such as services in the army, militia, the jury, etc., and that the amendment did not intend to bar the enforcement of those duties. (iv) the provisions relating to fundamental rights guaranteed ..... scc366 ,. (ii) the colonial rulers introduced western system of medicine in the country largely to cater to the needs of their settlers, servicemen and sepoys in the army; while the elite india had the options of availing the benefits of western medicine, the indian masses were left to be served by the indigenous system; the vast .....

Dr. Srinivasa K Vs. The Government of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... the ground that such proceedings ought to have been initiated within six months under the army act, 1950. referring to the above maxim, this court held that the take undue accused advantage own wrong. considering the relevant provisions of the act, the court held that presence of the accused was an essential condition for the commencement ..... medical colleges for obtaining the letter of intent and letter of permission for establishment of new medical colleges and yearly renewals as required under section 10-a of the indian medical council act, 1956, vide annexure-z would disclose the staff requirement even as on the date of letter of permission (lop) being issued, ..... matter of promotion an irresistible conclusion has to be drawn that such deviation is arbitrary.46. in exercise of powers conferred under section 10-a read with section 33 of indian medical council act, 1956, the medical council of india mci with the previous sanction of the central government has made regulations known and called .....

Ms. Bushra Abdul Aleem Vs. Government of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... inflow of students to the local institutions.10. learned sr. advocate sri m.r.naik, appearing for the petitioners submitted that the coercive provision in the act, namely sec.6 being manifestly arbitrary, apparently unjust & unreasonable, is liable to be voided if tested on the touch stone of principle of proportionality; there can be ..... thirteenth amendment of the us constitution, which prohibits involuntary servitude; the court reasoned that every individual owed certain duties to the state, such as services in the army, militia, the jury, etc., and that the 1325 amendment did not intend to bar the enforcement of those duties. (iv) the provisions relating to fundamental ..... scc366 (ii) the colonial rulers introduced western system of medicine in the country largely to cater to the needs of their settlers, servicemen and sepoys in the army; while 1279 the elite india had the options of availing the benefits of western medicine, the indian masses were left to be served by the indigenous system .....

Rama Balu Mangale (Deceased) by L.Rs Vs. Gafar Babalal Mulla

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2001KAR4098; 2001(4)KarLJ396

..... district judge, belgaum. the learned district judge concurred with the findings recorded by the munsiff and dismissed the revision petition filed under section 50 of the act. hence, the present revision petition under section 115 of the civil procedure code is filed by the l.rs. of the landlord against the concurrent findings of the courts below.5. ..... grant of eviction order by stating that the certificate produced by the petitioner is defective and, therefore, inadmissible as proof of the requirement under section 21-b(1) of the act. the landlord is in possession of another premises owned by his wife and is presently residing there. that he does not require the premises ..... nipani, retired from service from 1-12-1976, he is now an ex-serviceman of the indian army and that he requires suitable accommodation for himself and his family members for residence',section 21-b(1)(a) of the act is the special provision governing recovery of possession of premises by members of armed forces of the .....

N.C. Shivakumar and Others Vs. State by Lokayuktha Police Hassan Distr ...

Court : Karnataka

..... accepting the contention, the apex court has held thus: 4. in our opinion, the contention raised by the learned counsel for the appellant is well founded. sub-section (1) of section 19 of the act, which is relevant for the controversy in dispute, reads as under: 19. previous sanction necessary for prosecution. (1) no court shall take cognizance of an offence ..... in anil kumar v. m.k. aiyappa, (supra) that in the light of the opinions in state of up v. paras nath singh, subramaniam swamy v. manmohan singh and army headquarters v. cbi, (supra) that in the absence of a previous sanction, the magistrate is precluded from even receiving a complaint, it is necessary to refer to a constitution ..... as there is no reference to the same in state of up v. paras nath singh, (2009) 6 scc 372, subramanyam swamy v. manmohan singh, air 2012 sc 1185, army headquarters v. cbi, (2012) 6 scc 228, m.k. aiyappa v. state of karnataka, 2014(2) kccr 1412, all of which have consistently laid down that without a .....

N. Lokesh Vs. Bangalore University and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1997KAR2253; 1998(1)KarLJ741

..... general arts subjects and admission to a post-graduate course in a technical subject like computer science. secondly, there is a statutory bar (under section 57 of the karnataka state universities act, 1976) against admission of any student without the prescribed qualification. a candidate cannot plead estoppel against a statute. this aspect apparently did not ..... student. the student was eligible to be admitted to the course. the mistake was in giving the candidate a seat under a quota which was reserved for army personnel, to which she was not entitled. hence that case is of no assistance. the decision of allahabad high court related to an admission to a ..... . jayalakshmi v selection committee, university of health sciences, vijayawada and others. in that case, a candidate was admitted to medical college against the seat reserved for army personnel, even though she was not entitled to such seat, due to a mistake on the part of selection committee. subsequently her admission was sought to be .....

Shankaragouda Vs. Sirur Veerabhadrappa

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1963Mys81; ILR1960KAR766

..... 1951, an elector for an assembly constituency of a state is qualified to stand for election to a legislative assembly of that state. section 19 of the representation of the people act, 1950, entitles a person who is not less than twenty one years of age and who is ordinarily resident in a constituency of a ..... chief whip;(b) the offices held in the national cadet corps raised and maintained under the national cadet corps act, 1948 (central act xxxi of 1948), in the territorial army raised and maintained under the territorial army act, 1948 (central act lvi of 1948) and in the auxiliary air force and the air defence reserve under the reserve and ..... auxiliary air forces act, 1952 (central act lxii of 1952):(c) the, office of the secretaries of the district development boards constituted by the .....

Lakshmamma Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... hereinbefore. rival submissions 17. learned counsel appearing for the appellants in these appeals have advanced multifarious contentions while assailing the validity of the said sub-section (2) of section 49 of the act of 1993 as also the proceedings for consideration of the motions of no- confidence as moved. put in brief, the relevant part of the ..... .nos.1935- 1936/2018 (lb-res) wherein, the learned single judge of this court, while rejecting the contentions against the validity of sub- section (2) of section 49 of the act of 1993 and against the legality of the proceedings for consideration of respective motions of no- confidence, declined to interfere with the impugned motions and ..... advocate for c/r2 & r3) this writ appeal is filed u/s4of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the judgement and order passed by the learned single judge of this hon'ble court, dated2802/2018, vide wp no.1950/2018 consequently allow the writ petition & etc. in w.a. no.901/2018 between padmavathi. .....