Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 170 temporary custody of offender Court: karnataka Page 7 of about 261 results (0.149 seconds)

The General Manager Vs. H C Jayaprakash

Court : Karnataka

..... did not permit the respondent to encash 240 days of earned leave. hence, the respondent filed an application before central government industrial tribunal -cum- labour court under section 33c(2) of the industrial disputes act, 1947. the tribunal held that the respondent is not entitled to encashment of 240 days of earned leave. hence, the respondent herein filed the instant writ petition ..... residing at giridhama no.239/1, sharanappa layout tiptur 527 201 ... respondent (by sri.k.b. narayana swamy, advocate) this writ appeal is filed under section4of the karnataka high court act praying to2set aside the order dated0311.2016 passed by the learned single judge in writ petition no.12961 of2015l-res) and consequently dismiss the writ petition with costs. this writ .....

M/S Sri Krishna Shelters Pvt Ltd Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

..... regard to the judgment relied upon in the case of ranjit thakur v. union of india and others, air1987sc2386 while considering the provisions of section 130 of the army act, the honble supreme court held as to the tests of the likelihood of bias what is relevant is the reasonableness of the apprehension in ..... of arbitrators is not forthcoming and on that ground also, these civil miscellaneous petitions cannot be entertained exercising powers under section 11(6) of the act. under sub-section (2) of section 15 of the act, where the mandate of an arbitrator terminates, a substitute arbitrator shall be appointed according to the rules and were ..... arbitrators. since the petitioners have participated in the proceedings before the arbitrators by filing objections, the petitioners have waived the provisions of sub-section (5) of section 12 of the act. on that ground alone, civil miscellaneous petitions are liable to be rejected. it is further contended that once the arbitrators are appointed, .....

Ariyamma and ors. Vs. Narasimhiah and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1972Kant73; AIR1972Mys73; (1971)2MysLJ373

..... registration certificate of the vehicle on 4-9-1965.according to the tribunal, the hirer, sampathrai bothra, should be regarded as the owner of that vehicle under section 2 (19) of the act. in that view, the tribunal held that the only person who would be liable to pay damages was respondent-1, the driver of the vehicle, and that ..... tribunal under section 110-a of the act claiming a compensation of es. 3,000/- for her personal injuries. in both these petitions, it was alleged that the accident was due to rash and negligent ..... his wife ariyamma sustained injuries.3. the legal heirs of chinniah including ariyamma, filed before the tribunal a petition (in misc. case no. 439 of 1966) under section 110-a of the act claiming a compensation of rupees 10,000/- for the death of chinnaiah, ariyamma filed a separate petition (in misc. case no. 438 of 1966) before the same .....

Nagappa Hanumanthappa Lamani Vs. Management of Sericulture Department, ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [2002(94)FLR1183]; ILR2002KAR3573; 2002(4)KarLJ497

..... dismissal, discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person--(i) who is subject to the air force act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a prison; or ..... nature of the duties attached to the office or by reason of the powers vested in him, functions mainly of a managerial nature'. 'retrenchment' has been defined under section 2(oo).' 'retrenchment' means the termination by the employer of the service of a workman for any reason whatsoever, otherwise than as a punishment inflicted by way of ..... the termination by the employer of the service of the workman for any reason whatsoever other than those expressly excluded by the definition in section 2(oo) of the act would attract section 25-f of the act'; again at para 11 held, 'thus it is clear from the above said decision and most specially the two decisions of the supreme .....

Vishakantaiah T.N. Vs. Management of Mysore Petro Chemicals Limited an ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [2005(104)FLR161]; ILR2004KAR4890; 2004(6)KarLJ59; (2005)ILLJ364Kant

..... or whose dismissal, discharge or retrenchment had led to that dispute, but does not include any such person--(i) who is subject to the air force act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as officer or other employee of a prison; or(iii) ..... of the powers vested in him, functions mainly of a managerial nature':in the case of ved prakash gupta v. delton cable. india (private) limited, the supreme court interpreted section 2(s). what has to be seen in this case is, whether the petitioner is a workman under the above said definition and what is the substantial duty which he ..... in which those terms are understood in the industrial law.again in the case of s.k. verma v. mahesh chandra and anr., the supreme court interpreted section 2(s) of the act.again at paragraph 4, it is held as under:'so we adopt a pragmatic and not a pedantic approach and we proceed, in considering the question whether .....

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., a Company Registered Under the Indian Com ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2009KAR4172; 2009(4)KCCR2769; 2009(6)AIRKarR15(D.B)

..... (5) in ajib enterprises v. jayant vegoiles and chemicals pvt. ltd. : air 1991 bombay 35.v) the ex. p.12 would not constitute 'acknowledgement' within the meaning of section 18 of the limitation act, to save the limitation, since there is no existing concluded contractual liability under ex. p.1.vi) the p.w.1 is not a party to the transaction ..... the period of limitation.iv) the section 3 of the limitation act mandates that the court should not entertain a suit or application filed beyond the period of limitation, even in the absence of the plea of limitation in the ..... and should execute the sale deed within three months from the date of the agreement i.e., 2.6.1983. the date of performance is specified. therefore, under section 54 of the limitation act, within three years from the stipulated date, the suit should be filed. in the present case, the suit is filed on 5.7.1986, which is beyond .....

Smt.latha Holeyappa Bulla Vs. Smt.jakkavva W/o Basavaneppa Kampli

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... was a written agreement and therefore the parties are bound by the terms and conditions of the agreement. once a contract is reduced to writing, by operation of section 91 of the evidence act it is not open to any of the parties to seek to prove the terms of the contract with reference to some oral or other documentary evidence to ..... under liquidation for all practical purposes, could not have conveyed a better right than what was conferred on the lessee- company under ex.p.30, according to sec. 48 of the transfer of property act.14. now if ex.p.30 is seen, the following are the clauses that require interpretation. second: the term of the lease as mentioned above being ..... 29. in the case of smt. shanti devi (supra), it is held that after the determination of lease by efflux of time, service of quit notice under section 106 of transfer of property act is not necessary. and in the case of badrilal (supra) also it is held that for ejecting a tenant by sufferance, notice is not necessary to be .....

Smt. D.K. Tharadevi Siddhartha Vs. Electoral Registration Officer and ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR1245

..... government in consultation with the election commission. 8. in sub-sections (3) and (5) 'service qualification' means - a. being a member of the armed forces of the union ,or b. being member of a force to which the provisions of the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950), have been made applicable whether with or without modifications; or ..... the 3rd respondent is an ordinary resident within the shanthinagar assembly constituency.5. aggrieved by the said order, petitioner preferred an appeal under section 24 of the rp act, 1950 before the chief electoral officer. the appellate authority by an order dated 21.10.2002 rejected the appeal with an endorsement 'that the ..... registered as an elector in the shanthinagar assembly constituency by making a false declaration. hence, he should be prosecuted under section 31 of the representation of peoples act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as rp act, 1950) for registering as an elector by making false declaration. this was followed up by a further complaint on 6.5. .....

N.G.E.F. Limited Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Karnataka-ii, Bangalo ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1985]153ITR197(KAR); [1985]153ITR197(Karn)

..... the circumstances of the case, the tribunal was correct in holding that the expenditure in maintaining the flats in bombay and delhi was disallowable under section 37(4) of the income-tax act, 1961 ?' 2. the assessee is a public limited company. for the assessment years 1973-74 to 1975-76, it claimed deduction of expenses ..... tribunal. 3. the short question that arises for consideration is, whether s. 37(4) of the act is a bar to claim the expenditure incurred in the maintenance of these flats. 4. section 37 of the act is the residuary and general provision extending the allowances to items of business expenditure not covered by the preceding ..... sections. this section covers cases of business expenditure only. 5. sub-s. (3) deal with three types of expenditure : (i) .....

Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Ltd, Rep. by Its Chief General Ma ...

Court : Karnataka

..... consideration extraneous pleas, leading the tribunal and the court to grant reliefs which were not within the scope of adjudication. the provisions of sub-section (4) of section 10 of the act clearly provide that the tribunal shall confine its adjudication to the points referred and matters incidental thereto. therefore, it is necessary to confine the ..... the workmen or that the workmen continued only on account of an interim order of the court cannot be countenanced to defeat the provisions of section 25f and section 25j of the act. similarly, the pleas that the workmen were employed on specific jobs in soujanya counters and that the services in those counters were decided ..... that the workmen were not working in a factory and the place of their work could not be termed as an industrial establishment, warranting compliance of section 25n of the act. it was held that, if illegal appointments were made or illegal entries were created, such appointees could not be regularized by the court, and .....