Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 166 form of sentence of death Page 51 of about 564 results (0.088 seconds)

Ranjit Singh Chaurasia Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1976All405

..... and dismissed the writ petition. against the judgment of the learned single judge, this appeal has been filed.2. sections 34 to 68 of the army act, 1950, set out the offences punishable under this act and the punishments that may be inflicted on conviction for these offences. the appellant was tried for an offence under ..... section 40(c) for using insubordinate language to his superior officer. the maximum punishment provided for this offence under section 40 is five years. section 71 of the act ..... the court-martial sentenced him to three months' imprisonment as well as dismissal from service the appellant availed of the remedies available to him under the army act, 1950, but failed to get any redress. he thereupon filed a writ petition in this court. the only point he urged before the learned single judge .....

D.N. Ramana Reddy Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by Its Secretary, Bord ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(6)ALD53

..... 20-8-1996.respondents have also issued letters to his father and his wife as a part of procedure to be followed for initiating disciplinary action under the army act. however, in the meanwhile, the prolonged domestic problems have found solution on their own accord. therefore, immediately on 2-12-1996 he sent a letter ..... , submitted his resignation on 28-7-1996 in utter confused state of mind. he considered that resignation would be lesser evil than the disciplinary action under the army act at that time. out of frustration, he tendered resignation. on 3-8-1996 and again on 14-8-1996, he received communications from the 4th respondent ..... his duty. general reserve engineer force being an integral part of indian armed forces, certain provisions of army act/rules are made applicable to its members for maintaining discipline. overstayal of leave is subject to be dealt under army act and accordingly, the petitioner was advised to rejoin duty, failing which, disciplinary action could be taken. .....

Universal Music India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [2008]87SCL51(Delhi)

..... sangh and anr. v. state of bihar).42. while considering the question raised with regard to exercise of the power of the central government under section 19 of the army act, 1950 with rule 14 of the army rules, 1954, the apex court in : [2001]2scr1127 union of india and ors. v. harjeet singh sandhu held that the parameters of ..... first principles.36. it is noteworthy that at the relevant point of time when the aforestated judgments came to be pronounced, the statute contained section 10a to section 10d in the companies act, 1956 wherein further powers and functions of the government were envisaged.so far as the present case is concerned, the amendment to the statute ..... the company law board shall be such as may be prescribed. the central government had framed rules in exercise of powers conferred by section 642 read with sub-section 4b of section 10e of the act and had notified the company law board(bench) rules, 1975. after the amendments effected in 1988 which came into effect with effect .....

Mahadevappa Vs. Karnataka Lokayuktha and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2009KAR947

..... -martial under the provisions of the cr.p.c. but, they were conducted in accordance with the special procedure prescribed under the army act. therefore, the apex court held that such being the position, the provision of set-off in section 428 of the cr.p.c. can never be attracted in the case of persons convicted and sentenced by courts-martial to ..... : 1987crilj1877 , is concerned, that was a case where the question involved was whether the set-off provision contained in section 428 of the cr.p.c. can be pressed into service in respect of the proceedings under the army act. the apex court considered sections 4 and 5 of the cr.p.c. and found that neither the investigation nor the enquiry and not .....

J.S. Naik Vs. Asst. Commissioner, Air Customs and anr.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 1999CriLJ425

..... help to the respondents, since in that case the supreme court has held that a person convicted and sentenced by the general court martial under the army act, 1950 is not entitled to the benefit under section 428 of the cr. p.c. of set off of his pre-trial detention against the sentence of imprisonment since the ..... army act is a special enactment applicable to persons covered under section 2 of the act and the act also provides special procedure for court martial.11. it is clear from the two decisions of this court referred to above ..... the indian airlines as headloader and working at karipur airport, calicut. the petitioner was arrested on 22-9-1995 after summoning him and recording his statement under section 108 of the customs act. when produced before the addl. chief judicial magistrate's court, (economic offences), ernakulam, he was remanded to custody. though the application for grant of .....

Ravi Bhatt and Another Vs. the Director General, Armed Forces Medical ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1997Mad78; (1996)IIMLJ220

..... to conduct a court of inquiry into the matter concerning the selection to the second respondent college. the petitioners arc civilians and therefore the provisions of the army act or any other enactment would not be applicable to them and if at all they have to be summoned in a court of inquiry, procedure contemplated under ..... being selected to the undergraduate wing of the afmc. they are not commissioned officers and there is no contract applicable to them to be amenable under the army act. the instructions to candidates clearly stipulate that the officer-in-charge of the local examination centre is the final authority to decide about the alleged use of ..... therefore, to rely upon post admission and post qualification matters does not make the candidate to sit for the entrance examination as amenable to the provisions of the army act.45. it is also contended that the chief invigilator and the invigilator are the examination staff who are paid honorarium and who are entrusted with the test .....

Pradeepta Kumar Mohapatra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 97(2004)CLT34

..... of the pleadings of the parties, the main question that needs consideration is as to whether the petitioner was a regular army soldier recruited under the act or was a trainee recruit as claimed by the opposite parties. section 13 of the army act, 1950 prescribes procedures before enrolling officer. section 14 provides for mode of enrolment which contemplates that if after complying with the provisions of ..... section 13, the enrolling officer is satisfied that the person desirous of being enrolled fully understands the questions put to him and consents to the conditions of .....

Murari Lal Vs. K.C. Aneja

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1982CriLJ2082; 1982()WLN254

..... been enacted for delivery to commanding officer all persons liable to be tried by courtmardal. under this section the central government is authorised to make rules consistent with this code and the army act, 1950, the navy act, 1957 and the air force act, 1950 and any other law, relating to armed forces of the union. the court-martial rules have been framed in exercise of the ..... the arguments raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner:section 475. delivery to commanding officers of persons liable to be tried by court martial- (1) the central government may make rules consistent with this code and the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the air force act, 1950 (45 of 1950) and any other law relating to the armed forces .....

P. Chandra Mouli Etc. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Guwahati

..... the ministry of shipping and transport. by notification no. sro-329, dt 23-9-60 issued in exercise of powers conferred by section 4(i) of the army act, 1950 (the act for short), the central government applied provisions of the act with the exceptions shown in schedule 'a' and subject to modifications mentioned in 'sch. 'b' of the notification, to ..... khatri submits if that was the understanding of the ministry of defence itself, the court should endorse this view.7. this para rends:section 5 enables the provisions of the indian army act to be applied to any force (of military police for instance) raised and maintained in india by the government of that country but which ..... bear in mind the previous state of law for the purpose of ascertaining the intention of the legislature. section 4 of the act is analogous to section 5 of the indian army act, 1911. whose provisions were understood by the defence ministry itself, submits shri khatri, to have laid down that the function of the commander-in .....

Vijayakumar B. Jiragyal Vs. Chief of the Army Staff and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2005(3)KarLJ550

..... mr. visweshwara, learned senior counsel, let me see as to whether the order requires my interference in the given circumstances.9. army act of 1950 is an act to consolidate and amend the law relating to the government of the regular army. section 40 provides for punishment of imprisonment of a term which my extend to 14 years in the event of a person committing ..... on the head of captain rajesh masurkar. a charge-sheet was issued to him. he was charged for using criminal force to his superior in terms of section 40(a) of the army act.1.1 he was punished with the sentence of ri for 28 days with effect from 21-4-1998 to 18-5-1998. on 25-5-1998. ..... an offence of using criminal force to or assaults a superior officer, in the case on hand petitioner is charged under section 40 .....