Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 166 form of sentence of death Page 48 of about 564 results (0.062 seconds)

Smt. Rajbala W/O Mai Chand Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2002)104BOMLR277

..... and worked there till his death in 1987. the petitioner was granted family pension under the family pension scheme constituted under the provisions of the act of 1952 but her claim for army pension was declined on the ground that only one family pension was admissible to her. the learned single judge allowed the petition filed by the petitioner ..... treated as rule position for all cases. the petitioner was asked to refund the amount drawn from the family pension scheme under the employees' provident fund act, 1952 to be eligible for army pension. to the same effect the respondent no. 3 has also issued letters dated 9.6.1996, 14.8.1997 and 13.8.1999. the ..... civil side. the late husband of the petitioner was working in a public limited company after his retirement from the army and after his death the petitioner is receiving the family pension under the provisions of the act of 1952 because of the monthly contribution made by the petitioner's husband to the employees' provident fund and also .....

Ex. Sep. Sital Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 64(1996)DLT289; 1996(39)DRJ405; (1997)ILLJ276Del

..... discharge from service be not taken. the reply from the petitioner was found not to be satisfactory. on 30.10.1990 the impugned order was passed.6. sub-section (3) of section 20 of the army act empowers an officer, having power, not less than a brigade or equivalent commander or any prescribed officer, to dismiss or remove from service any person serving under ..... was pointed out that the misconduct of the catching hold of the hand of a girl would fall under the category 'civil offences' defined under section 69 of the army act for which a person would be liable to be tried and on proof can be imposed sentence of imprisonment assigned for the said offence by the law in force in ..... india. in this case would be an offence under section 354 of the indian penal code, for which the imprisonment is for a term which may extend to 7 years or less imprisonment as is provided in the army act. it is stated that had the petitioner been tried by a court martial for the .....

Ajai Kumar Roy Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003CriLJ3999

..... on 17-11-2002 and approached the respondents 2 and 3 for permission to meet the detenu, but he was not allowed to see him. under section 101(1) of the army act, 1950 ('the act' for brevity) it is the duty of the officer taking a person into military custody to inform the detenu of the grounds of arrest in writing ..... does not arise.8. in order to set at rest the issue in controversy, we would like to refer to section 101(1) of the army act, 1950 which reads as follows :101. custody of offenders :-- 1) any person subject to this act who is . charged with an offence may be taken in to military custody;2) any such person may be ..... arrest.2) where any person arrested shows symptoms of sickness, medical assistance shall be provided for such person. 12. section 50 of the army act, 1950 reads as follows :50. irregularity in connection with arrest or confinement.-- any person subject to this act who commits any of the following offences, that is to say,-- a) unnecessarily detain a person in arrest or .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. S.P.S. Rajkumar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2007(6)SC278; 2007(6)SCALE124; (2007)6SCC407

..... 4.2000, this court in union of india and anr. v. charanjit s. gill and ors. : air2000sc3425 interpreted certain provisions of the army act, 1950 (in short the 'act') and the army rules, 1954 (in short the 'army rules') holding that the judge advocate should be equal or superior to the rank of the accused officer just like the rules provided for the ..... by doctrine of necessity the concerned judge advocate was the only available officer. 5. the respondent-rajkumar filed post confirmation petition under section 161(2) of the air force act, 1950 (in short the 'air force act') on 30.1.2000 and the same was rejected by the central government on 24.9.2001. by judgment dated 5.8.2002 ..... of seniority of the judge advocate. it is submitted that the provisions in the army act and under the army rules are entirely different from air force act and air force rules. it is pointed out that any rule similar to rules 103/104 of the army rules did not exist in the air force rules. the gcm proceedings were over. .....

Shri Shantilal Nagarwal, Ex. Mcelar Second Class Vs. Union of India (U ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR3069

..... confused for reasons. he submitted that the apex court had specifically considered the question of requirement to give reasons in the context of analogous provisions of the army act and the army rules in s. n. mukherjee v. union of india reported at (1990) s.c.c. 594. it may be useful to quote observations of ..... him to the rank of petty officer and depriving him of three good conduct badges. petitioner sought judicial review by the commander in chief under section 160 of the navy act, who reduced the sentence as indicated above by his impugned order. aggrieved thereby, petitioner is before this court.6. we have heard the learned ..... district courts martial; ( c ) summary general courts martial and (d) summary courts martial. the procedure of court martial is prescribed in chapter xi (sections 128 to 152) of the act. section 129 prescribes that every general court martial shall, and every district or summary general court martial may, be attended by a judge-advocate, who shall be either .....

Gajaji Gopalji Jadeja Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2005)2GLR1142

..... provides living wage etc. for workers. article 46 provides promotion of educational and economic interests of scheduled castes, scheduled tribes and other weaker sections.9. relying on the scheme of the act and the judgement of the hon'ble supreme court, the learned counsel for the petitioners has made the following submissions:9.1 the petitioners ..... of the state of gujarat. it was further submitted that the petitioners cannot pretend that their nature of duty is just like that of bsf and other army personnel.10.8c the learned counsel further submitted that the petitioners are not the members of 'paramilitary force', as per ex-servicemen (re-employment in central ..... the nature and the kinds of duties performed by the border wing home guards in relation to the borders and border areas and the method of working under army or border security force, etc. (the letters are addressed by battalion commandant to company commandant).f. the border wing home guards has been described as paramilitary .....

Akhil G Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court : Kerala

..... whatsoever, but shall not include matters relating to- (i) orders issued under section 18 of the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950), sub-section (1) of section 15 of the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and section 18 of the air force act, 1950 (45 of 1950); and (ii) transfers and posting including the change of place or unit on ..... ship in relation to the persons subject to the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the air force act, 1950, (45 of 1950 ..... supplied) service matters referred to in section 14 is defined in section 3(o) as follows: 3. (o) service matters, in relation to the persons subject to the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the air force act, 1950 (45 of 1950), meal all matters relating to the conditions .....

Kulwant Singh (Nk.) S/O Sardar Sadhu Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1991(0)MPLJ985

..... challenging conviction and sentences of the petitioners in court martial proceedings for alleged offences said to have been committed by them under sections 37(c), 38(1) and 63 of the army act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act').4. in the sikh regiment centre at ramgarh on 10-6-1984 soldiers waged a mutiny and looted the arms in ..... 4) no. 3381905 sepoy hakum singh all of the sikh regimental centre, attached with adm. bn. the jammu and kashmir rifles regimental centre are charged with :first charge army act, section 37(c) against all accused persons being present at a mutiny in the military forces of india, not using their utmost endeavours to suppress the same, in that they ..... battalion kotes. the cause of mutiny in the sikh regiment was said to be the entry of the indian army in the precinct of the golden .....

Sarat Kumar Malu Vs. State of Orissa and anr.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1992Ori128

..... court also referred to the case of ram sarup v. union of india, air 1965 sc 247, where the vires of section 125 of the army act which authorised the officer either to try a case by court-martial or by an ordinary court or by a criminal court, was challenged on the ground that the ..... j.1. in this writ application under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india, the petitioner seeks a declaration that section 56(2) and section 56(2-a) of the orissa forest act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') are ultra vires article 14 of the constitution of india, by reason of vesting of unbriddled, uncanalised, unregulated powers in forest ..... modes prescribed being clearly within the discretion of the authority without any guidelines the section was violative of article 14 of the constitution. the supreme court held that .....

Manju Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(1)ESC224; [2005(104)FLR773]; (2005)1UPLBEC435

..... chief of the army staff has, after taking into consideration the other factors come-to the conclusion that the retention of that ..... was tried by the court-marshal but, upon the confirmation, as provided in the army act and rules, the confirming authority came to the conclusion that there was some technical flaw, therefore, the court-marshal proceeding was dropped in view of section 121 of the army act, which clearly goes to show that second trial is not permissible, therefore, in view of the fact the .....