Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 16 persons to be attested Year: 1957 Page 1 of about 15 results (0.081 seconds)

Major E.G. Barsay Vs. the State

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1958)60BOMLR159

..... persons who are subject to the act. under section 3(ii) 'civil offence' is denned as 'an offence which is triable by a criminal court', and ..... others, the provisions of sections 125 and 126 of the army act read with the relevant rules framed under the act, have not been complied with.15. in order to examine these submissions, it would be necessary to deal in some detail with the provisions of the army act, 1950, and the rules made thereunder. section 2(1) of the act gives a list of ..... that there are some irregularities and errors in the charge.14. the second point as regards the legality of the trial is raised under the provisions of the army act, 1950, by mr. purshottam on behalf of accused no. 1. that again is a point which has been raised for the first time in appeal challenging the jurisdiction .....

Major E.G. Barsay and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1958CriLJ1144

..... persons who are subject to the act, under section 3 (ii) 'civil offence' is defined as 'an offence which is triable by a criminal court', and ..... , the provisions of sections 125 and 126 of the army act read with the relevant rules framed under the act, have not been complied with.14. in order to examine these submissions, it would be necessary to deal in some detail with the provisions of the army act, 1950, and the rules made thereunder. section 2 (1) of the act gives a list of ..... that there are some irregularities and errors in the charge.13. the second point as regards the legality of the trial is raised under the provisions of the army act, 1950, by mr. purshottam on behalf of accused no. 1. that again is a point which has been raised for the first time in appeal challenging the jurisdiction .....

United States Vs. Plesha

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the government. [ footnote 17 ] but public statements of veterans' administration officials gave the act a squarely contrary construction. [ footnote 18 ] page 352 u. s. 210 section 401(1) required soldiers seeking the benefit of the 1940 act to file applications on forms prepared in accordance with the regulations of the veterans' administration. ..... disability payments, and low-cost government insurance. similarly, the provisions under consideration here were adopted to assist soldiers who had bought insurance before entering the army, and did not require them to reimburse the government. affirmed. mr. justice frankfurter, mr. justice burton and mr. justice harlan dissent for the ..... these 476 lapsed policies, and total collections were $484.42. records submitted show that all collections were obtained from soldiers who were still in the army at the time they were called on to pay. the demands for payment went through regular military channels. [ footnote 17 ] apparently the first time .....

Rowoldt Vs. Perfetto

Court : US Supreme Court

..... its result, the court has had to take impermissible liberties with the statute and the record upon which this case is based. section 22 of the internal security act of 1950, under which these proceedings were brought, provides for the deportation of aliens who, at the time of entry into the united ..... unwittingly, and without their knowledge or consent, were impressed into the various labor fronts and professional unions and organizations; aliens who served in the german and italian armies, and aliens who . . . , by law or decree, became members of or affiliated with subsidiary totalitarian organizations." and the third class, as described ..... or affiliation with, certain totalitarian youth, national labor, or professional student, or similar organizations, or the alien's service in the german or italian armies, or his involuntary membership in totalitarian parties or their affiliates and auxiliaries, including those cases where it was shown that such membership or affiliation occurred by .....

Kishori Lal Vs. the State

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1957P& H244; 1957CriLJ1173

..... elsewhere, of an offence punishable under chapter xvii of the indian penal code, or(c) has been convicted, either within the cantonment or elsewhere, of any offence punishable under section 156 of the army act, or(d) has been ordered under chapter viii of the code of criminal procedure, 1898, either within the cantonment or elsewhere, to execute a bond for his good ..... authority, in the light of its facts, makes it inapplicable to the subject-matter of enquiry in this case. it was held in that casd that sections 21 and 22 of the west bengal security act, 1950, impose unreasonable restrictions on the exercise of fundamental rights of a citizen of india as mentioned in article 19(1) (d) and (e) of the constitution .....

Hansraj Moolji Vs. the State of Bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1957SC497; (1957)59BOMLR910; 1957CriLJ599; [1957]1SCR634

..... the power of the indian legislature to make laws - (a) ordinances may, during the said period, be made under that section affecting the army act, the air force act, or the navel discipline act; and (b) section one hundred and eleven of the government of india act, 1935 (which exempts certain british subjects from certain indian laws) shall not apply to any ordinance made under the said ..... in operation on july 11, 1953, the date on which the offence in question was committed by the appellant.23. this position was recognized in the adaptation of laws order, 1950, issued under the constitution of india. in the second schedule to the said order were contained several central ordinances enacted between 1940 and 1946 including the high denomination bank notes .....

Soriano Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... by the statute, 62 stat. 976, 28 u.s.c. 2501. [ footnote 1 ] on july 26, 1941, pursuant to the philippine independence act, [ footnote 2 ] president roosevelt ordered the philippine army into the service of the armed forces of the united states. [ footnote 3 ] after the fall of bataan and corregidor in 1942, elements of this ..... time to time, all of the organized military forces of the government of the commonwealth of the philippines. . . ." [ footnote 4 ] victorio v. united states, 91 f.supp. 748 (1950), vacated, 122 ct.cl. 708, 106 f.supp. 182 (1952); logronio v. united states, 132 ct.cl. 596, 133 f.supp. 395 (1955), overruling the second victorio opinion, ..... were made. from such appropriations, the philippine government paid whatever claims were found valid. for further discussion of the operation of the army claims service in the philippines, see victorio v. united states, 91 f.supp. 748 (1950). [ footnote 6 ] while the court of claims held in dino v. united states, 119 ct.cl. 307 (1951), .....

Lachman Prasad Ram Prasad and ors. Vs. Superintendent, Government Harn ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1958All345

..... opt for the new scale of pay which was to be effective from january, 1947. 3. by a letter dated 10th december issue by the controller, army factory accounts misc. section calcutta, the petitioners were given the benefit of 1947 rules. in accordance with the instructions issued in this letter the respondent fixed the pay of the ..... no right of action and are not entitled to any relief under article 226 of the constitution. article 309 provides that subject to the provisions of this constitution, acts of the appropriate legislature may regulate the recruitment, and conditions of service of persons appointed, to public services and posts in connection with the affairs of the ..... article 310 of the constitution. the contention of the petitioner is that the governor general made certain rules in the exercise of his powers under section 242 of the government of india act, 1935. these rules have statutory force and if any of these rules are not observed it is open to the person affected by such .....

Sardar Kapur Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1957P& H173

..... of india.38. in article 133(1) of the constitution of india the words 'judgment, decree and final order' are textually the same as those used in section 205 of the constitution act of 1935. in the civil procedure code appeals to the privy council and after the abolition of the jurisdiction of the privy council and conferment of the jurisdiction on the ..... c), in which the facts were that a netherlands subject residing in england was called up for service in the netherlands army and he descited. he was arrested as a deserter under the army act and was handed over to the netherlands army. he ap-plied for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that ill's arrest as a deserler was unlawful ..... not a final order.44. in premchand satramdas v. state of bihar, 1950 scr 799: (air 1951 sc 14) (z24), an appeal was sought to be.taken against an order of the patna high court dismissing an application under section 21(3) of the bihar sales tax act to direct the board of revenue to state a case and refer it to .....

Sree Rajendra Mills Limited and Others Vs. Income-tax Officer, Central ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1958Mad220; [1957]32ITR439(Mad)

..... for the assessment, levy and collection of taxes, notwithstanding that they accrued or arose at a period anterior to the coming into force of the government of india act, 1935. section 292 having provided for the continued operation of the law, there could be no hiatus, no break with the past, leaving a gap to be bridged. thus ..... succession to the crown or the sovereignty, dominion or suzerainty of the crown in any part of india or the law of british nationality or the army act, the air force act or the naval discipline act or the law of prize courts, or(ii) except in so far as it expressly permitted by any subsequent provisions of this ..... by virtue of the powers conferred under section 18 of the indian independence act, has no significance for the determination of the present question. the net result, therefore, is that these arrears of income-tax were demandable from the petitioners during the period from 15th august, 1947, to 26th january, 1950.the next question to be considered is .....