Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 16 persons to be attested Sorted by: old Year: 1957 Page 1 of about 15 results (0.222 seconds)

Jan 04 1957 (HC)

Sardar Kapur Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-04-1957

Reported in : AIR1957P& H173

..... of india.38. in article 133(1) of the constitution of india the words 'judgment, decree and final order' are textually the same as those used in section 205 of the constitution act of 1935. in the civil procedure code appeals to the privy council and after the abolition of the jurisdiction of the privy council and conferment of the jurisdiction on the ..... c), in which the facts were that a netherlands subject residing in england was called up for service in the netherlands army and he descited. he was arrested as a deserter under the army act and was handed over to the netherlands army. he ap-plied for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that ill's arrest as a deserler was unlawful ..... not a final order.44. in premchand satramdas v. state of bihar, 1950 scr 799: (air 1951 sc 14) (z24), an appeal was sought to be.taken against an order of the patna high court dismissing an application under section 21(3) of the bihar sales tax act to direct the board of revenue to state a case and refer it to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 07 1957 (HC)

Parukutty Amma Vs. Chellamma

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-07-1957

Reported in : AIR1957Ker69

..... even without any representative of theirs' taking part in its execution; and if in the execution of such a partition deed the minors' father, who under section 10 of the nair act is the guardian of their person and property other than' their tarwad property, is allowed to participate as their father and guardian, it could only be by ..... tarwad has been done which is not prejudicial to the minor, he or sho cannot bo represented by the father as guardian. the argument based on section 10 of the nair act is also unsustainable.'according to the appellant's learned counsel this decision is incorrect and requires reconsideration.4. so far as partitions are concerned the position under ..... said in that case:''it was argued that lekshmi could not be legally represented by her father in the partition deed because under the proviso to section 10 of the nair act the guardianship of the husband or the father shall not extend to the right and interest of his wife or children in their tarwad property. all .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 14 1957 (FN)

United States Vs. Plesha

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-14-1957

..... the government. [ footnote 17 ] but public statements of veterans' administration officials gave the act a squarely contrary construction. [ footnote 18 ] page 352 u. s. 210 section 401(1) required soldiers seeking the benefit of the 1940 act to file applications on forms prepared in accordance with the regulations of the veterans' administration. ..... disability payments, and low-cost government insurance. similarly, the provisions under consideration here were adopted to assist soldiers who had bought insurance before entering the army, and did not require them to reimburse the government. affirmed. mr. justice frankfurter, mr. justice burton and mr. justice harlan dissent for the ..... these 476 lapsed policies, and total collections were $484.42. records submitted show that all collections were obtained from soldiers who were still in the army at the time they were called on to pay. the demands for payment went through regular military channels. [ footnote 17 ] apparently the first time .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 14 1957 (FN)

Soriano Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-14-1957

..... by the statute, 62 stat. 976, 28 u.s.c. 2501. [ footnote 1 ] on july 26, 1941, pursuant to the philippine independence act, [ footnote 2 ] president roosevelt ordered the philippine army into the service of the armed forces of the united states. [ footnote 3 ] after the fall of bataan and corregidor in 1942, elements of this ..... time to time, all of the organized military forces of the government of the commonwealth of the philippines. . . ." [ footnote 4 ] victorio v. united states, 91 f.supp. 748 (1950), vacated, 122 ct.cl. 708, 106 f.supp. 182 (1952); logronio v. united states, 132 ct.cl. 596, 133 f.supp. 395 (1955), overruling the second victorio opinion, ..... were made. from such appropriations, the philippine government paid whatever claims were found valid. for further discussion of the operation of the army claims service in the philippines, see victorio v. united states, 91 f.supp. 748 (1950). [ footnote 6 ] while the court of claims held in dino v. united states, 119 ct.cl. 307 (1951), .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 1957 (HC)

Surjan Singh Vs. the East Punjab Government

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-31-1957

Reported in : AIR1957P& H265

..... that the legislature intended by enacting this act to make section 6 of the general clauses act applicable to the expired defence of india act and to repeal the ordinance as unnecessary. our constitution came into force on the 26th of january, 1950. article 395 of the constitution repealed the government of india act and article 372 laid down that all ..... connection i may refer to steavenson v. oliver, (1841) 8 m. and w. 234 (b). in that case under a temporary act every person who held the commission as surgeon in the army was entitled to practise as an apothecary without passing the usual examination. the question arose whether such a person could so practise even after ..... persons who had held warrants as assistant-surgeons in the navy or army remained entitled to practise notwithstanding the expiration of the statute. alderson b. in the same case observed-'it seems to me that these persons who, during the year for which the last act was to continue in force, or previous to that period, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 11 1957 (HC)

Nanik Dharamdas Vazirani Vs. Maharaja Sayajirao University, Baroda and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-11-1957

Reported in : AIR1957Bom246; (1957)59BOMLR569; ILR1958Bom60

..... the legislature thought it necessary that action should be taken only after giving an opportunity to be heard, an express provision in that behalf was made in section 47 of the act. evidently the petitioner is not claiming protection of any fundamental right by his petition, and the ordinance not having made it obligatory upon the university to give ..... the papers submitted by him does not, in our judgment, vitiate the order passed by the university. a comparison of the answer papers in the economics section and the mathematics section discloses that there has been serious misconduct on the part of the petitioner either in copying from the answer papers of another candidate or allowing another candidate ..... the maintenance of discipline.where a class teacher or the head of an educational institution or a commander of an army in the field or an officer in charge of a fire brigade is faced with act of indiscipline on the part of a student or examinee or a member of the force for the purpose of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 1957 (SC)

Hansraj Moolji Vs. the State of Bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-12-1957

Reported in : AIR1957SC497; (1957)59BOMLR910; 1957CriLJ599; [1957]1SCR634

..... the power of the indian legislature to make laws - (a) ordinances may, during the said period, be made under that section affecting the army act, the air force act, or the navel discipline act; and (b) section one hundred and eleven of the government of india act, 1935 (which exempts certain british subjects from certain indian laws) shall not apply to any ordinance made under the said ..... in operation on july 11, 1953, the date on which the offence in question was committed by the appellant.23. this position was recognized in the adaptation of laws order, 1950, issued under the constitution of india. in the second schedule to the said order were contained several central ordinances enacted between 1940 and 1946 including the high denomination bank notes .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 1957 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Punjab, Himachal Pradesh and Bilaspur, Sim ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-18-1957

Reported in : AIR1957P& H226

..... trustees; 1934-1 k b. 524 (g), the same view was taken of the meaning of the word 'discovers' occurring in section 125 of the income-tax act, 1918. this section was similarly worded as section 52 of the taxes management act, 1880. section 125 runs -- '(1) if the surveyor discovers that any properties or profits chargeable to tax have been omitted from the first assessments ..... before the appellate tribunal, which, by its order dated 7-8-1950, determined the assessable income at rs. 21,814/- as against rs. 41,833/-. the relevant paragraph from the order of the tribunal reads as under: 'so far as the assessment for 1939-40 is concerned, the notice under section 34 was issued in respect of a particular item of concealment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 1957 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Punjab, Himachal Pradesh and Bilaspur, Sim ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-18-1957

Reported in : [1957]32ITR418(P& H)

..... williams v. trustees of w. w. grundy the same view was taken of the meaning of the word discovers' occurring in section 125 of the income tax act, 1918. this section was similarly worded as section 52 of the taxes management act, 1880. section 125 run :'(1) if the surveyor discovers-that any properties or profits chargeable to tax have been omitted from the first assessment ..... before the appellate tribunal, which, by its order dated 7th august, 1950, determined the assessable income at rs. 21,814 as against rs. 41,833. the relevant paragraph from the order of the tribunal reads as unde :'so far as the assessment for 1939-40 is concerned, the notice under section 34 was issued in respect of a particular item of concealment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 1957 (HC)

Bharat Board Mills Ltd. Vs. the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner a ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-28-1957

Reported in : AIR1957Cal702,61CWN694

..... requisition issued under the signature of the join secretary to the government of west bengal wasnot in order in the absence of delegation of power under section 19 of the act and so the certificate proceedings initiated on the strength of such a requisition were bad and without jurisdiction. it appears that in the present case ..... petitioner is to approach the central government for determination of the question whether the petitioner's factory is an infant factory within the meaning of section 16 of the act and the petitioner has no right to invoke the jurisdiction of article 226 of the constitution for determination of any such question which involves decision ..... from the operation of the act. i have already set out in extenso the provisions of section 16 in an earlier part of this judgment. 14. it is submitted by mr. dutt that the petitioner company obtained the certificate of incorporation on the 29th june 1950 and commenced business on the 31st july 1950. a particular registered number .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //