Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: armed forces tribunal act 2007 section 32 condonation Court: andhra pradesh Page 7 of about 3,069 results (0.593 seconds)

Jun 29 2006 (HC)

Kommuru Rama Mohan Rao S/O Subba Rao Vs. V. Kanaka Durgaiah and the Or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008ACJ2235; 2007(1)ALD459

..... compensation and since none of the appellants can be said to be his legal representatives as they are not the persons enumerated in section 2 of the fatal accidents act, the tribunal rightly held that they are not entitled to any compensation. he relied on bontu venkata rao v. kalla venkataramana 2003(2) alt 572, where it is held ..... the estate of the deceased, is a claimant consequent upon her death, appellants would be her legal representatives by virtue of the provisions of the hindu succession act, and so the tribunal without dismissing the claim petition on the ground that there are no legal representatives to the estate of the deceased, ought to have arrived at the compensation ..... . since the deceased was aged about 24 years, as seen from ex.a. 2, panchanama of inquest, and since the accident occurred prior to 1994 amendment to the act coming into force, the multiplier as per bhagawandas v. mohd. arif 1987(2) a.l.t. 137 can be taken as '18'. though there is no reliable evidence on record .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 27 2004 (HC)

R. Jayalakshmamma Vs. Election Tribunal-cum-senior Civil Judge and ors ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2004(5)ALD525; 2004(5)ALT400

..... jurisdiction; and failed to exercise such jurisdiction. while observing that in exercising certiorari jurisdiction, the court is not entitled to act as an appellate authority, it was held that writ of certiorari cannot be issued unless the tribunal acts illegally or improperly, as for instance, it decides the question without giving opportunity of being heard to the party effected ..... child) is within one year from the date of commencement, the same shall not be taken into consideration for the purpose of section 19(3) of the act. the act came into force on 30.5.1994, as notified by the government of andhra pradesh vide g.o. ms. no. 304 dated 25.5.1994. the second proviso to ..... if she fails to prove that her child was born within one year from the date of coming into force of the act. as rightly pointed out by the learned senior counsel, the disqualification under section 19(3) of the act would disqualify petitioner once for all in her lifetime to seek election for any office or post under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 24 2004 (HC)

The Commissioner of Proh. and Excise, Government of A.P. and ors. Vs. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2004(6)ALD403; 2004(6)ALT76

..... repeatedly been held to be rules of administration practice merely, not rules of law and not delegated legislation and they have no statutory force.50. lord bridge in r. v. immigration appeal tribunal ex p. bakhtaur singh1 has said that they are 'quite unlike ordinary delegated legislation', that they 'do not purport to enact ..... the short question that falls for consideration is whether the circular instructions issued by the commissioner are ultra vires the provisions of the a.p. excise act, 1968 (act 17 of 1968) and any of the rules framed thereunder?13. learned counsel for the writ petitioners contended that the commissioner in exercise of his power ..... authority, as the case may be. the administrative instructions/circulars so issued, regulate the manner in which the personnel entrusted with the administration of the acts and their enforcement are required to discharge their functions. such circular instructions are always considered to be general in nature and it is for the authority .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 08 2014 (HC)

R.Damodar Red Vs. the Commissioner of Income Tax and Anoth

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... court. there is no controvers.in this case as to the applicability of the scheme, since the appeal preferred by the petitioner was very much pending before the tribunal. the scheme maintains a distinction between the assessees, who are individuals, on the one hand, and the assessees, that are companies, firms etc.on the other ..... competent legislature. acceptance of the contention of the accused therein would have resulted to absurd situations. in r. v baker , section 23(2) of the firearms act, 1937 fell for consideration. it provided for punishment of imprisonment of 7 years.if a person is arrested on suspicion of having committed schedule offence, i.e.possessing ..... issued by the board, in a way adds some more dimensions and angles to the scheme. basically, the board can neither expand nor restrict the scope of the act, but can only issue instructions and clarifications, for effective implementation. instances, though rare, are not lacking, in which a grammatical reading of a provision of law .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 28 1999 (HC)

Director General, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1999(4)ALD209; 1999(4)ALT489

..... judge, the petitioner contended that the notification issued by the government of india applying the provisions of sub-section (3) of section 14 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 (the act) to the indian council of agricultural research services with effect from 15th may, 1987, does not oust the jurisdiction of this court because the 3rd respondent ..... in the case of l chandra kumar v. union india, : [1997]228itr725(sc) , that while the jurisdiction of the high court cannot be ousted the tribunals are to act as courts of first instance. it must be noted that the supreme court has held as unconstitutional the exclusion of the jurisdiction clause, and therefore, in exceptional ..... petition is not decided on that date, the order of thelearned single judge dated 3-12-1996 shall stand stayed till the review petition is decided.6. armed with the order of the hon'ble supreme court referred to above, the respondents through their counsel appeared on 23-1-1998 in the review petition without .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 2007 (HC)

K. Suvaramma and ors. Vs. A.P. Wakf Board Rep. by Its Chief Executive ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(1)ALD182; 2008(1)ALT12

..... observation of this court provides the necessary guidance, in this regard.para-10 : it is not denied by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the tribunal has jurisdiction. no provision act or rule is challenged before this court nor is it the case of the petitioners that principles of natural justice have been violated. the case does ..... objection raised by the respondents, as to the maintainability of the writ petition needs to be dealt with.6. the suit was filed before a tribunal, constituted under section 83 of the act. the tribunal is conferred with the power to adjudicate any dispute, question, or other matter, relating to a wakf, or wakf property, and it is ..... 1) notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, no suit, appeal or other legal proceeding for the enforcement of any right on behalf of any wakf which has not been registered in accordance with the provisions of this act, shall be instituted or commenced or heard, tried or decided by any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2007 (HC)

P. Manohar Reddy Vs. Appellate Authority Under Section 53 of the A.P. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(6)ALD686; 2007(6)ALT76; (2008)ILLJ1117AP

..... period of their absence from duty on the principle of 'no work-no pay'. thereupon, the workmen invoked the jurisdiction of the industrial tribunal under section 33-c(2) of the industrial disputes act. the bank contended that the application under section 33-c(2) was not maintainable. the labour court allowed the application of the workmen ..... in payment of the wages(14 of 1947, or under any corresponding or service compensation payable underlaw relating to the investigation and this act to employees in anysettlement of industrial disputes in force establishment in that area.in the state or] any commissioner forworkmen's compensation or other officerwith experience as a judge of a civilcourt ..... within which the payment is to be made;(e) any sum to which the employee is entitled under any scheme framed under any law for the time being in force; but does not include -(i) any bonus, whether under a scheme of profit sharing or otherwise, which does not form part of the remuneration payable under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 04 1996 (HC)

A.P.S.R.T.C. Vs. Smt. T. Yasodha and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1996(4)ALT1133

..... towards loss of consortium to the wife of the deceased and rs. 3,000/- towards funeral and incidental expenses, the total exceeds rs. 80,000/- and actually the tribunal has awarded less than that. apart from that, for adequate reasons such a compensation having been arrived at by adopting the multiplier method, this court finds no reason to ..... interested or going to be aggrieved ultimately. rule 533-a of the ap mv rules which regulates the application for claim etc., in sub-cl.(6) empowers the tribunal to decide the matter after obtaining information from police, medical and other authorities and pass the award whether or not the parties attend on the appointed date and according ..... is not based on materials and therefore the award has to be set aside.4. the first contention has no force. the law is settled that the driver is not a necessary party. neither section 110-a of the act nor the rules framed there- under contemplate impleading the driver as a party. the owner of the vehicle will .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 1997 (HC)

Spl. Dy. Collector, L.A., Nuzvid Vs. D. Krishna Murthy (Died) Per Lrs. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(4)ALD132; 1998(3)ALT230

..... acquired should have been under the personal cultivation of the land-holder and secondly, it must be within the ceiling limit applicable to him under any law in force. the division bench held that once these two requirements were satisfied, the right to receive compensation at the market value is a guaranteed right under article 31a. ..... that stay operates as between the parties and it cannot be said that the judgment rendered by the division bench of this court is denuded of its binding force or precedential value as regards third parties. the learned government pleader found it difficult to justify the view taken by the reference court in this regard. irrespective ..... also be entitled to the benefit of additional amount under section 23(1-a) of the act in view of the judgments of the supreme court in k.s. paripoornan v. state of kerala, : air1995sc1012 (dn) and khanna improvement trust v. land acquisition tribunal, : [1995]1scr404 (dn).32. the judgments and decrees of the lower court, in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 07 1995 (HC)

V. Ramachandra Reddy and ors. Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Re ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1995(3)ALT203

..... surrender of certain extents of land by the writ petitioners by virtue of the introduction of andhra pradesh land reforms (ceiling on agricultural holdings) act, 1973 (for short 'the act') which came into force with effect from 1-1-1975 and the rules framed thereunder - called as 1974 rules-(for short 'the rules'). the petitioners in writ ..... at 15% per annum on the said compensation. the compensation payable in respect of the fruit bearing trees shall be determined by the concerned land reforms appellate tribunal, forthwith, after calling for the report of the district forest officer, nellore and the compensation be paid to the petitioners within a period of 3 months from ..... trees, viz, palmyrah trees and cashew nut trees etc. raised thereon by investing huge sums and hoping the same to be their property but for coming into forces of land reforms act.8. as an answer to these contentions, mr. k. ashok reddy - the learned government pleader for revenue - argued that the claim made by the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //